CENTER FOR PERFECTION STUDIES: CONTINUITY•SYMMETRY•HARMONY. GOALS.November.2023
PAGES: π (pi) |.ASSUMPTIONS.|.FOOTNOTES |.REFERENCES|. EMAILS.| IM | PARTICIPATE.| Zzzzs

Eight Basic Concepts Proposed
by Bruce E. Camber

Abstract. The editors and writers of all major science publications and websites are carefully studying the reports from the scholars and scientists associated with the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). Along with results from our other space telescopes, the status quo, even cherished beliefs that have become part of our commonsense worldview, are being disrupted. Eight most-speculative concepts, each a paradigm shift for big bang cosmology, are proposed for critical review.

Key words:* James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), Scientific American, New Scientist…

Introduction: The most-analyzed images from the JWST will continue to be of those formations approaching 300 million years from the start of the universe. Before the JWST, it seemed safe to assume that the Standard Model for Cosmology and the ΛCDM (Lambda cold dark matter or Lambda-CDM model were a reasonable parametrization of the big bang theory. It is obvious now that is not true. Those JWST images are telling us that something is wrong with our models. 

Many scholars are going after the standard model and/or the Lambda-CDM; those who have questioned the big bang theory are looking more closely at its weaknesses and how its strengths can be replicated.

Proposed: Start this universe — tabula rasa — and ask, “What comes first?” A corollary question, “What could be the most simple building block in the universe?”

Philip Davis, once of NIST and Brown University, had been asking that question for generations. He assumes there is “something” more fundamental than particles and waves. In mathematics it includes equations, dimensionless constants, natural numbers, geometries, and so much more. The question persists, “What is the most simple building block that is within everything, everywhere for all time?”

One possible path to find an answer would be:

1) Recognize the importance and place of the natural units and all the dimensionless constants like pi (π). Some of these units would logically define the first moment of space-time. Pi (π) with its generation of circles and spheres has three primary facets, continuity-symmetry-harmony. If we were to take as a given that pi participates in the creation of the first moment of space-time, it necessarily preconditions all things everywhere, for all time.¹

2) Recognize how base-2 exponentiation defines 202 notations from the Planck, Stoney or ISO base units (with all the associated natural units and dimensionless constants). This mapping starts at the first moment of space-time, Notation-1, and goes right up to this very moment in time, which we will call the Now.

This natural inflation is virtually identical to the inflation/expansion within the big bang. Those first 64 base-2 notations within the infinitesimal open many new possibilities for basic mathematical applications. Although considerable work had been done to accommodate the Big Bang, most of it will not need updating, just the expression, after the big bang. It will begin to mean “…after the big bang became an historic footnote of a key theory that failed.”²

3) Recognize how the first 64 notations are below the thresholds of measurement by devices and instrumentation. Knowledge of these domains is currently only through logic and mathematics (including algorithms, equations and geometries). Our current outline is active right Now.³

4) Recognize the expansion (and inflation) by acknowledging that there is one infinitesimal sphere for each of the smallest possible units of length-and-time. As an example, a simple calculation with Planck’s numbers yields 539 tredecillion spheres per second.⁴

5) Recognize how these spheres populate the universe and render a grid or matrix of 202 notations connecting all things for all time, everywhere.⁵

6) Recognize how this grid defines a domain of perfection because there is too little time and too much density for imperfections to manifest. Today quantum fluctuations are measured within Notations 65-to-67.⁶

7) Recognize that quantum fluctuations have a geometry that is opened with five tetrahedrons and/or five octahedrons (close-up) and/or icosahedrons made of twenty tetrahedrons and/or the Pentakis dodecahedron of twelve five-tetrahedral clusters. This imperfect or squishy geometry is the geometry of indeterminism, probabilities, and free will.⁷

8) Recognize those studies not connected to a Standard Model. Within a base-2 infrastructure of the universe each of these disciplines can apply their work most likely within the first 64 notations that ostensibly connect the two models.⁸

Other key issues include the nature of time, the necessary involvement of infinity, and the studies regarding an open universe.

We got started with this current analysis by reading the New Scientist, 6 September 2023. Our notes to four of the authors have been posted. The first was to Jon Butterworth and it became a homepage. The note to Alex Keshavarzi opened memories of communicating with one of the prime movers of the big bang, Andrei Linde, and how he suggested that to have credibility, first study, then solve the muon problem. Clare Burrage brought us very close to this page while an email to Surjeet Rajendran further opens studies of those scholars who are trying to get beyond the standard model (BSM).

Conclusions. In 1927 Lemaitre first started with a cold primeval atom that contained everything. In 1980 Stephen Hawking, Alan Guth, Andrei Linde and others were trying to start the universe with a singularity that contained all space-time, matter-energy for all time. In 2023 we are asking the academic-scholarly-and-scientific communities to consider a natural inflation from the simplest possible units of space-and-time and that these can be defined by Max Planck, George Johnstone Stoney or the International Standards Organization (ISO).

Look at the absurd state of our world. Our models are incomplete, our understanding is most incomplete, and it seems more and more dystopian views are accepted as inevitable. It is sheer poppycock and utter nonsense. These eight concepts are simple. Let’s update our foundations for understanding to more fully engage the meaning and value of life. Thank you. -BEC

_____

This page is https://81018.com/new-science/

_____

Endnotes & Footnotes
In process: Not many because all these points already have pages within this website…

[*] Abstract. James Webb Space Telescope (JWST);
Scientific American, Sept. 2022;
New Scientist, Timothy Revell (NYC), Jon Butterworth (NS), Alex Keshavarzi (NS), Clare Burrage (NS), Surjeet Rajendran (NS), Emily Adlam and Matt Strassler, Six ways we could finally find new physics beyond the standard model, September 9, 2023
Also, Abigail Beall, An alternative way to picture the standard model of particle physics
Jon Cartwright, A brief history of the standard model, our theory of almost everything

[1] Everything, everywhere for all time. Not quite a theory of everything (TOE), this chart of the mathematics of 202 base-2 notations is a possible working outline of the universe. It will challenge us to look at every key issue within the academic world. Infinity becomes a key. Redefined by the primacy of pi (π), and its ubiquitous circles and spheres, the work of David Hilbert and Kurt Gödel are both challenged. Infinity shapes the finite and imbues the finite with continuity-symmetry-harmony. These three facets of the infinite become the basis for smoothness which then become the basis for homogeneity and isotropy. Each of the 202 notations start with the same foundation and that perfect geometry accounts for dark matter and dark energy. And, inflation is readily accounted for within a natural exponential notation where infinity is defined as continuity-symmetry-harmony.

[2] “…after the big bang became an historic footnote of a key theory that failed.” Perhaps a little addendum might be added, “…and simple math took over.” Phil Davis was an educator for all people. He wanted us to learn the basics. Where the big bang hides the basics deep within their singularity, this base-2 notation spreads it out so with every prime number notation, we can begin to figure out what an ordered progression for growth is.

[4] Exponential notation. We assume the universe is fundamentally shaped by base-2 exponential notation. We also assume one infinitesimal sphere is rendered per unit of the most infinitesimal length and time, be it Planck Time, Stoney Time, or ISO time. Each yields spheres at a rate of expansion equivalent to the speed of light. If we use Planck’s base units, the rate is 539 tredecillion spheres per second. It is a fascinating study and we have only scratched the surface.

[5] The Grid or Matrix. The word, grid, was used by Frank Wilczek because he thought the 1999 movie, The Matrix, had tainted the meaning of the word, matrix. Given that the film was rebirthed in 2003 and 2023, he is probably right, but, just maybe, the concept of a grid of infinitesimal spheres that touch everything, everywhere, throughout the universe and through all time might help those writers of their next film script! We’ve been asking film makers for many years to consider this alternative model.

[6] Perfection. The concept is difficult for most. It shouldn’t be. People have experiences of perfection. These experiences are signposts along the way of a lifespan. Within this website, perfection is defined by the primary facets of the sphere, continuity-symmetry-harmony. There is too little time-and-space and the densities are too intensely-high for anything but cubic-close packing of equal spheres and that generates the most-simple tetrahedrons and octahedrons. Those who have bought into quantum mechanics, lock-stock-barrel, will readily question these assertions. They may even find the idea of perfection repugnant; nevertheless, there is a certain logic to this domain. The first second is within Notation-143, the first year within Notation-169, and the first million years within Notation-189. At this point in our considerations we have begun to postulate about factors that could trip the perfect fittings of these geometries within spacetime. Without getting into mythopoetics, one can imagine that precedence could play a role and fluctuation geometries do not occur until the later notations (well after the first second), and that, over time, fluctuations found a natural seating within Notations 65-67.

[7] Imperfections and freedom. Many scholars and scientists may bristle to be asked to accept that quantum fluctuations begin with a geometry that creates open space or a gap. Each link within this section goes to images of geometries that create gaps. To date, there has been no gap geometry per se and very little geometry of quantum fluctuations. It needs to be more-pointedly considered and studied. At the infinitesimal, smaller than Notations 65-to-67 where fluctuations are first recorded, it is hypothesized that systems theory emerges between Notations 50-60. Today, that could be as high as Notation-65. Within systems theory, it is hypothesized that the brain, which appears to operate between many notations within the human scale, may be coordinating through the mind somewhere within Notations 50-to-60. It is among our more speculative ideas… yes, that here, free will and the values of freedom and justice prevail.

[8] Beginning with Langlands programs, strings, and SUSY…. There are far too many scholars and scientists whose work has not had a place on the grid. These scholars may also include those who work with hypothetical particles, loop quantum gravity, causal dynamical triangulation, causal set theory, spectral standard model, and even field theories.

Big bang cosmology has been blocking the view.

_____

Much more work to come…this is the period when we ask for feedback and make updates! -BEC

_____

References & Resources
As references are studied, the key references and resources will be added to this page here.

1. Dimensionless constants, cosmology and other dark matters, Frank Wilczek, Anthony Aguirre, Martin Rees, Max Tegmark, ArXiv, January 11, 2006, Table 1, page 2, 5
2. Max Planck’s natural units, Robert L. Wadlinger; Geoffrey Hunter, Phys. Teach. 26, 528–529 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2342611, Nov. 1988
3. JWST early Universe observations and ΛCDM cosmology Rajendra P Gupta, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 524, Issue 3, September 2023, Pages 3385–3395, 07 July 2023
4. Michael Silberstein, W. M. Stuckey, Timothy McDevitt, Beyond the Dynamical Universe: Unifying Block Universe Physics and Time as Experienced, Oxford (2018); Website: https://www.relationalblockworld.com/ (link has known security problems); ArXiv articles: Mysteries” of Modern Physics and the Fundamental Constants c, h, and G, (October 2021)
5. Classic: GEORGES LEMAÎTRE, The Beginning of the World from the Point of View of Quantum Theory. Nature 127, 706 (1931). https://doi.org/10.1038/127706b0
6. Probing Spacetime Foam with Extragalactic Sources of High-Energy Photons, Y. Jack Ng (UNC), Eric S. Perlman (Florida Institute of Technology), ArXiv, 2022
7. Is the Photon Really a Particle? V.2 (PDF), Paul A. Kelvgard, Sandia Lab, 2021
8. The UniverseClock: The simple logic that created the UniverseClock is the same logic that guides the logic for a grid or matrix of infinitesimal spheres that defines the universe that defines all time and space. In this chart the universe is somewhere around 436,117,076,600,000,000 seconds old. That is in-and-around 13.82 billion years.
9. The Theory of Exponential Expansion of the Universe, Prithwijit Sarkar (Kolkata, India), International Journal of Theoretical and Mathematical Physics (p-ISSN: 2167-6844 e-ISSN: 2167-6852), 2015James Webb Space Telescope Images Challenge Theories of How Universe Evolved, UT News, April 13, 2023
10. Wikipedia: Tetrahedral-octahedral honeycomb

_____

Emails There will be emails to many of our scholars about key points.

Leonard Susskind, 6 November 2023, Stanford
Sharmila Kuthunur, 31 October 2023, Seattle (WA)
Huda Yahya Zoghbi, 24 October 2023, Baylor School of Medicine, Houston
Clare Burrage, 21 October 2023, Nottingham
Joel Leja, 20 October 2023, Penn State, State College
Alex Keshavarzi, 20 October 2023, University of Manchester, England
Halena Abramowicz, 17 October 2023, Tel Aviv University
Rajendra P Gupta, 17 October 2023. Ottawa
Amanda Pagul, 17 October 2023, STSI, Maryland
Kelly Kizer Whitt, 17 October 2023, Earth-Sky, Austin, Texas
Michael Boylan-Kolchin, 13 October, UT-Austin
Kurt Riesselmann, 12 October 2023, Fermilab, Chicago
Michael Duff, 11 October 2023, Imperial College, London
George Ellis, 11 October 2023, University of Cape Town
Will Kinney, 10 October 2023, SUNY-Buffalo
Katherine Freese, 10 October 2023, UT-Austin
Fabiola Gianotti, 9 October 2023, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland

_____

IM Instant Messages to thought leaders around the world about these key points.

2:31 PM · Nov 9, 2023 @macfound Hexagonals in your header orders space, but more! It is cellular, chemical and atomic structure that is scale invariant given it is basic structure of an octahedron: https://81018.com/octahedron/ (notice the four hexagonals inside), naturally from ccp: https://81018.com/ccp/ Attached was an image of their header image.

8:42 AM – 4 Nov. 2023 @AIP_Publishing Do base-2 exponential numbers from Max Planck‘s base units tell us anything? That chart is here: https://81018.com/chart// Might it help to begin to formulate a theory about the first second of our universe (between notations 143 and 144). The Now is Notation-202.

5:10 PM · Nov 3, 2023 @chandlertuttle JWST challenges our 40-year old big bang theory and the scholars attack the the Standard Model and the Lambda CDM. The big bang can be fully replicated by applying base-2 at the Planck scale (base units): https://81018.com/new-science/ Numbers: https://81018.com/chart/

4:03 PM · Nov 1, 2023 @ScienceMagazine Which is better? …natural inflation or a big bang? …Standard Model or big bang? …Lambda CDM using a natural inflation? SEE: https://81018.com/new-science/ It is entirely idiosyncratic but it’s simple and natural.

3:20 PM · Nov 1, 2023 @SciAm If JWST scholars looked beyond the Standard Model to big bang cosmology’s inflation, they’d discover that it is replicated by applying base-2 notation to the Planck base units. It works! From the start to this day is just 202 doublings: https://81018.com/new-science/

4:10 PM · Oct 31, 2023 @AstronomyMag Within 300 million years of the start does not support an infinitely-hot bit bang no matter how hard the inflaton works. The Standard Model will push the big bang out for a natural inflation: https://81018.com/new-science/ Reference to you here: https://81018.com/new-science/#IM

16 October 2023: @deepskieslab @Tiana_Athriel @samudre_ashwin Top goal: How deep is it? Down to the Planck scale? Or, out and back to the 300 million year mark? How much further? How do you scale it all? Surprisingly you’ll find just 202 base-2 notations first defined by pi and time. https://81018.com/ might be interesting. –BEC

_____

Participate

You are always invited.

_____

Keys to this page, new-science

• This page became the homepage on October 27, 2023.
• The last update was 14 November 2023.
• This page was initiated on 23 October 2023.
• The URL for this file is https://81018.com/new-science/
• The headline for this article: Eight Basic Concepts Proposed
• First teaser* is: Possibly opening doors to new, simple-but-comprehensive foundations…

*Or, wicket, kicker or eyebrow.

_____