###### CENTER FOR PERFECTION STUDIES: CONTINUITY•SYMMETRY•HARMONY • USA • GOALS • OCTOBER 2018

HOMEPAGES: **JUST PRIOR|****2|****3|4**|**5**|**6**|7|8|9|10|11|12|13|14|15|16|17|18|19|20|PI|ORIGINAL

ARE THERE ANY MORE SECRETS THAT LIGHT MIGHT YET REVEAL TO US?

DO WE UNDERSTAND HOW IT PERMEATES ALL 202 NOTATIONS?

202 DOUBLINGS: GRID OF EVERYTHING, EVERYWHERE FOR ALL TIME – NOT A THEORY OR VISION – JUST MATH.

*The Poetry of Light Bottling Time*

###### BY BRUCE CAMBER

###### RELATED: ANALYSIS, CHART, COMMONSENSE, CONCEPTS, CONTINUUM, **EFFICACY**, EMERGENCE, GROWTH & **GRAVITY.**

**EFFICACY**

**GRAVITY.**

**Overview**: In September 2018, I sent this email to a scholar at the Institute for Advanced Studies (IAS) in Princeton. IAS is a mecca for intellectuals. All their people receive so much email, I am surprised when anyone responds. However, the most simple part of Planck’s definition of Planck Time, in plain sight since 1906, could be revisited. By applying base-2 to the Planck units, especially Planck Time, light is given an expanded role (line 10). I think it is curious and could use some commentary so I have sent this letter along to those who have received emails or tweets but they may not have considered this equation for light. -BEC

**September 2018**

**RE**: Thinking about the relation between light and space-time

**TO**: Scholars with whom we have communicated in the past

Is it reasonable to consider Max Planck’s simple definition of time when we talk about the interior of the space-time?

Rather surprisingly Planck’s more simple formula actually computes well with experimental results. And, if base-2 notation is applied to Planck Time, it computes well within every notation, not just at one second. It is a variable as each quantity is multiplied by 2. Yet, that variable appears to remain within 1% throughout all 202 notations from Planck Time at the start to the current time*.*

By inserting the other base units along this scale of the universe, the data sets become more challenging, yet the simple correspondence between length and time tells a profound story. The correspondence with mass and charge, though stretching the imagination, still retains a deep logic and continuity.

Might you comment? …just nonsense?

Thank you.

Most sincerely,

Bruce

****************

Bruce Camber

http://81018.com

Austin, Texas

**PS**. This work started in a New Orleans high school geometry class where we chased Zeno’s paradox to the *Planck Wall* and then asked, “What else can we do?”

• Related links: (1) https://81018.com/c/ (2) https://81018.com/light-visible/

• Chart of numbers: https://81018.com/chart/ (see line 10)

• A little background story: https://81018.com/home

**With modifications for each, the recipients of a recent email in its spirit are as follows**:

Russ Holt (CEO, AAAS), Steve Adler (IAS), Niayesh Afshordi (Perimeter/Waterloo), Anthony Aguirre (UC-Santa Cruz), Michael Atiyah (Edinburgh)… there will be more to come.

## Editor’s Notes about Navigation and Other Points of Interest:

**Navigation**: Scroll to the top of the page. Cursor over the word HOME and a very long drop down menu will be displayed. It can be scrolled. There is a link to every homepage within this site from its beginning in September 2016.**Homepage**. Click on**Our Universe in 202+ Doublings**to go to the*current*homepage.**In that “second header” there are links to the past 25 homepages**. “Just Prior” always goes to the most recent, then each number is active to the next prior homepage. The image goes to the horizontally-scrolled chart as does its tagline.**Values and ethics**: Within our study of universals and constants, there is a sense of value that gives rise to values and ethics. The antithesis is nihilism which eventually opens us all to the various forms of dystopia we are experiencing today.

**The current struggle**: Who will lead us? Who can break the impasse?

*Might the seven First Ladies of oldest trade routes of our world break the impasse?*

## ________________

## More key evocative questions:

Back in my very early days at Synectics Education Systems (1971- ), in the days of analogies and metaphors, one of the most important activities was trying to grasp key evocative questions. Here are a few of those questions explored within this site:

**What are the fundamental units that define our universe?****Does each progression represent the “longest possible” continuum?****Are any big bang theories necessary in light of a natural inflation?****Is our intellectual depth being constricted by our two Standard Models?****Shall we revisit our structure for scientific revolutions?****Can these concepts be tested using rather simple formulas?****Does measurement qua measurement actually begin with pure math and logic?****Is “infinitely-hot, infinitely-dense, infinitely-small” the wrong place to start?****What is the deep nature of growth?****Are our imaginations working overtime?****What is an inertial frame of reference in light of 202 notations?****Are some concepts first principles”?****Can Turok, Arkani-Hamed or Tegmark open a new frame of reference?****What is pi that we are mindful of it?****Ask the penultimate questions: What is finite? What is infinite?****Are we asking enough “what if” questions?****Who is on our team? To whom do we turn?****What has been the driving vision?****What is the fabric of the universe?****Are there rules for our roads? What are they?****Is the universe exponential? Is Euler’s identity spot on?****Is this model built on something even faster than exascale computing?****Does the universe go on forever or just as far as the current expansion?****Is there a better way to keep track of all these writings?****Who among us is really and truly in a dialogue with the universe?****Why? Then as a child, ask the question again, Why? And again, ask, “Why?”****Have there been summaries of these ideas? What have we missed?****Are the 202 doublings still a virtually unexplored area for research?****The arrogance of language: How do we know what we know and don’t know?****What are the most important qualities of infinity?****Does the original homepage (January 2012) anticipate the future?**

**Join us. Challenge us. Help us. We need all the help we can get!**

An excellent resource to translate any of our pages by its URL:

http://itools.com/tool/google-translate-web-page-translator

*If you liked this page and website, please do not hesitate to follow us on Twitter or Linkedin. *

Our visitors come from many countries (a snapshot on September 21, 2018)

**Among today’s challenges**:

1. **The Tesseract**. First tweet: @tesseractband OK, smart folks. How do you live up to your name? You make every performance a teaching event. The Tesseract is somehow involved in these 202 base-2 notations that bind the universe: Let’s figure it out and you all be the evangelists.

2. Extend the simple reference to consciousness. See Witten.

3. More related pages: