To Break Free Of Cambridge University Lucasian Professors, Isaac Newton & Stephen Hawking
By Bruce Camber, Initiated: December 2017
We are all human and none of us have all the answers. Some people are very smart, yet even they have limitations; that includes Newton and Hawking. Neither of them were aware of the following:
1. The 202 doublings from the Planck units to the Age of the Universe: The logic and flow suggest that we live in a highly-integrated universe.
We started working on our chart in 2011. Each doubling is simple, granular, natural, and symbolic. Other scales of the universe encapsulate meaning, yet, logically, base-2 is the most simple, most-informative by creating real boundary conditions, beginning at the Planck Scale and going to the current Age of the Universe. Multiplying and dividing by 2 with its initial simple symmetries can readily enfold all others. Creating a very real parts-whole simple logic, it seems to me, our dimensionless numbers either work within this simple scale of the universe or we should be re-examining the nature of logic and numbers. Take any chart as a given (our chart), there are many substantial observations to make. The biggest is that our physical universe is finite and derivative. Planck Time is the first moment of the universe. Going up to the current time, this range defines the Age of the Universe. So, I believe it is long overdue that we all revisit Sir Isaac Newton’s absolute space and time. It has been our “commonsense” view for centuries and I believe it has been truncating our scholarship since the 1687 publication of his Principia. Of course, I struggled with this conclusion, but this chart of simple calculations opened such a challenging new perspective, I could not ignore it. My struggle. Chart. Why now?
2. Follow this base-2 chart, step-by-step; our universe has a natural inflation.
This Quiet Expansion is a clear alternative to big bang cosmology. Although leading academics around the world have discounted the big bang theory, a clear alternative has yet to be accepted by their industry. Here is my proposed framework for an alternative based on the simplest-possible math. More. More. And more.
3. We are now exploring the concept of an exponential universe.
It seems that Euler’s equation from the year, 1748, could be much larger than ever expected. What physicist Richard Feynman called “our jewel… the most remarkable formula in mathematics”  can be applied to the universe. By doing so, it re-opens the discussion about the finite-infinite relation. More. More. And more.
4. Space and time are not infinite, nor absolute.
See Planck’s formula for Planck Time. It is bound to light (c) and Planck Length. If that simple formula is true and it is logically extended throughout all 202 notations, we redefine space, light and time, and that necessarily calls infinity out to be redefined, too. More… And more…
The near future. I tried to turn to an old acquaintance, Freeman Dyson, to discuss the entire history of renormalization. Dyson was born in 1923 and we had our first discussion in August of 1978 in his office at the Institute for Advanced Studies. His mathematics of renormalization will be reopened in light of the 202 notations. In so doing, our studies of the finite-infinite relation-and-dynamics can be re-engaged in what I anticipate will be significant ways. More…
My next task is to study that history to see if there could be a normalization independent of concepts of space and time yet reflective of all the work (both mathematics and physics) regarding higher dimensions. Within the context of our exponential universe, the first 64 notations may just add new flavors and special light on some of those old discussions, i.e. superstring theory and its 10 spacetime dimensions.
A geometry of imperfection and probability comes out of our studies of the pentastar (five tetrahedrons sharing a common centerpoint) and the icosahedron (twenty tetrahedrons sharing a common centerpoint). It appears to the not-so-deeply informed (me) that these same geometries are also responsible for quantum fluctuations. In the study of each notation and how each notation is necessarily derivative of the prior, we will continue to study and intuit the nature of these fluctuations. More…
 http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_22.html (Note: If this link fails to take you to his lecture 22, Algebra, please advise me. You will find the quote in section 22-6, the third paragraph from the bottom where he says, “We summarize with this, the most remarkable formula in mathematics… This is our jewel.”
- A little mini-index of the most current work
- The chart of the universe using base-2 exponential notation
- Measuring the universe with the Planck scale
- The thrust of the universe
You’re invited to join this team to pursue a deeper, more basic truth and to grow as genuinely as possible in our openness, integrity, and curiosity.
An invitation: Join us…