What would you do with this simple model of the universe?

CENTER FOR PERFECTION STUDIESCONTINUITY•SYMMETRY•HARMONY  • USA • GOALS • OCTOBER 2018
HOMEPAGES:  JUST PRIOR| 2|3|4|5|6|78|9|10|11|12|13|14|15|16|17|18|19|20|21|22|PI|ORIGINAL
1-8-pink
8 of the 202 NOTATIONS . THE FIRST 64 ARE BELOW THRESHOLDS OF MEASUREMENT.

Reported by BRUCE CAMBER (INITIATED: OCTOBER 12, 2018)

Five key assumptions about this universe

1. Planck’s base units: The best place to begin a study of the universe
2. Planck base units:  Length / Time,  Mass / Charge
3A natural inflation (thrust): Define each base unit from light and from never-ending, never-repeating dimensionless constants like pi
4. An infinitesimal sphere: The first manifestation of physicality
5. The units, the thrust, and the spheres: The mechanism for doublings
.
Initial results. Within this very special naïveté the universe is outlined in just over 202 base-2 notations, simple doublings from the Planck base units to the age-and-size of the universe. Since December 2011 many scholars have been introduced to our chart of numbers, but most rather quickly dismiss the chart as idiosyncratic. And it is, we know that!  But, there is a simple logic and simple mathematics so we ask, “Is it worth pursuing? What needs to be done so it can stand up to the scrutiny of academic community?”
.
To that end, please vote! Encourage or discourage this work?
.
Encapsulation: There are many working on a theory of everything (aka grand unified theory). This chart seems to give such theories a container within which to work. Logically, this chart seems to include everything, everywhere, and throughout all time. Doesn’t this doubling process from the Planck units ostensibly do that?
.
Seeing it all differently: The chart is a mathematical outline of the universe.  Take a look:  https://81018.com/chart  This simple chart is horizontally-scrolled so our high school students could readily follow the progression of numbers for each of the Planck base units. This project started very slowly back in December 2011.
.
Key Problem. Isn’t science asking too much of our particle zoo? Assuming our Planck base units are the starting points, the CERN-scale does not begin until the 65th to 67th doublings. That gives us at least 64 doublings, a huge array for a very new mathematical physics to develop every sort of flavor, spin, and emergent behavior required, measured, or observed.
.
Hypostatic, the Emergent.  Given the fact that these 64 notations are clearly beyond our limits, even for CERN laboratories, an entirely new industry based on logic and mathematics has begun to emerge. Langlands Programs are symptomatic indicators.

Please Vote:   Continue-Your-Work / Cease-And-Desist

_________________________________________________________________________

References/Resources

________________________

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s