Guth, Alan

We Communicate With Everybody. Scholars / Specialists Index Last update: 2 January 2017

guthAlan Guth

Victor F. Weisskopf Professor of Physics, MIT
ArXiv Blog BI Twitter Wikipedia YouTube
Key Article: Time Since The Beginning (ArXiv)
Key Book: The Inflationary Universe

Page contents:

October 2016 Emails

Email: The very first email, July 6 2016


Friday, October 21, 2016 Email

The entire statement from within the box was sent to Alan Guth. It was also sent to Stephen Hawking, Max Tegmark, Frank Wilczek, and Freeman Dyson.


Tuesday, October 18, 2016 email

Is there any possibility that “natural inflation”
is the grounding for base-2 expansion within cells,
bifurcation theory, and quantum fluctuations?



End notes by Bruce Camber: In 1975 I met Victor Weisskopf, then chairman of the MIT Physics Department. I was born in Boston and grew up in the greater Boston area. When I read that Prof. Weisskopf was part of the Pontifical Academy of Science in Rome, I asked myself, “How could a Jewish physicist of such repute be involved with the Roman Catholic Church?” I asked a friend who happened to be a writer for the Wall Street Journal, and we both concluded that it would be a great read for a WSJ A-Hed article.

Professor Weisskopf had the two of us come for lunch at the MIT faculty club. Unfortunately the article never made it into the prestigious middle column, yet it was a most pleasant introduction. When I called to let him know that the article was not going to make it, he invited me to his home to look at his artwork and large-format art books which together became the basis for talking a bit about the nature of infinity.

Not long thereafter, Professor Weisskopf arranged for me to meet with John Bell at CERN laboratories.

It was with some surprise that I discovered that the Father of Inflation, Alan Guth, held the Victor Weisskopf chair.

Of course, people of Guth’s stature get letters and emails from crackpots all the time and I knew that my notes to him, however well-intentioned, would fall into that category. Notwithstanding, just for the record (and probably confirming the “crackpottery” comment), I’ll post just my correspondence here in this place.

Unless otherwise encouraged, no correspondence from scholars will ever be posted. -BEC

Monday, 10 October 2016 email

Dear Prof. Dr. Guth:

Might we create a new model of the universe by using the Planck base units and base-2 exponential notation to carry those units out to the Age of the Universe? We are a high school geometry class; our math and logic are all quite simple. There are a total of just over 200 notations. By the 144th notation, just over a second from the first moment, there is more than enough inflation (mass-energy-length-and-temperature) to produce a very compelling, exquisitely dense, quark-gluon universe without so much as a bang. It is a wonderland, and it seems that this Alice redefines the very nature of space and time.

Just silliness? I don’t think so. And given the gravity of the inherent nihilism within the big bang model, it is most important that the two leading theorists for it, be intellectually honest, even after a lifetime of devotion to it. Everyone must be prepared to challenge their most cherished concepts.

We all need to reconsider the necessity of a big bang. Thank you.

Most sincerely,
* * * * *
Bruce Camber
New Orleans


This note is a result of a posting about the so-called Inflationary Epoch.
In 1978 and 1979 Alan Guth of MIT wrote groundbreaking works whereby
his concept of The Inflationary Universe became part of the core anatomy
of the big bang theory. This note was sent to Prof Dr. Guth via email and it was titled, Inflationary processes:

July 6, 2016 The First Email

TO: Prof. Dr. Alan Guth, Victor F. Weisskopf Professor of Physics, MIT

Dear Prof. Dr. Alan:

I was born in July 1947, so you are my senior; and, I write
with admiration and respect for what you have accomplished.
There is a special confidence that one gets from affirmations
especially from being published. It seems so very eternal.

My question comes out of work done in a high school geometry
class when we ducked inside a tetrahedron, found half-sized
tetrahedrons in the four corners and an octahedron in the middle.

We then went inside that octahedron, divided each edge by 2, and found
half-sized octas in each of the six corners and the tetras in each
of the eight faces. A perfect tessellation, it was easy to continue.
In about 40 jumps within, we were down among the protons.
In another 67 we were in a singularity with the Planck base units.

Feeling a little uncomfortably tight, we quickly multiplied
those base units by 2 and in 201 notations we were lost,
but looking at ourselves from out in-and-around
the Age of the Universe and the Observable Universe.

Now, this is all happening just up river from New Orleans
Zoo, downriver from the NOLA international airport. We’re
just high school folks and the kids.

That was 2011. We rushed right by Kees Boeke whose
work my MIT friend, Phil Morrison embraced. When
we included all five Planck base units, it got very challenging.

1. Nobody talks about those 67 notations from the
fermion-proton range down to the first Planck base
units’ doublings.

“Much too small to be meaningful!”
say the kings and queens of physics.
Why? “Off with your head!” (in the spirit of Alice
in Wonderland’s Queen of Hearts).

2. Really now, if Max Planck found a path to such
small numbers (length, time, mass) and to the not
so small charge, and to an absolutely gargantuan temperature,
shouldn’t there be a way to get to them through with
a bit of simple logic and simple math?

Why not?

We’ve mapped it out in a large horizontal chart:

It’s rich with information, but it could be all wet.

Any advice for us literal abstractionists?


Most sincerely,



Bruce Camber
New Orleans

PS. Long ago, in 1976, I was the guest of Victor Weisskopf
at the MIT faculty club where I had arranged for a WSJ writer
to interview him for an ““A-Hed” article. It was to be about
how the chairman of the MIT physics department was involved
with the Pontifical Academy of Sciences in Rome. Though
the article was never published, Weisskopf invited me to
his home to review great artwork, some quite religious,
that challenged our understanding of space and time.

About six months later, on a trip to visit with folks in
Geneva at both CERN and the World Council of Churches,
Weisskopf arranged my first meeting with John Bell to
talk about the EPR paradox and his inequalities.

Then, in 1979, I had a display project under the dome at 77 Massachusetts Avenue called, “What is life?
after Schrodinger’s book of the same title. It was
an attempt to examine the first principles and answers
to the question by 77 leading, living scholars from around the world.

Jerome Wiesner buttonholed me at that time, “What’s this?”
thinking it was a right-to-life group! Such memories.
So, I am still wrestling with the same old questions!

These paragraphs from the preface of your book,

The Inflationary Universe, I enjoy:

The Inflationary Universe - Guth

Thanks. -BEC

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s