First Principles: Emerging Mathematically-Integrated Model of the Universe

Image of abstract geometric shapes representing continuity, symmetry, and harmony in a mathematical model of the universe.
A cosmic representation highlighting hyper-rationality, featuring spheres, octahedrons, and hexagonal plates, depicting continuity, symmetry, and harmony in an expansive geometric model of the universe.

PERFECTION STUDIES: CONTINUITY•SYMMETRY•HARMONY. GOALS.July 2020
PAGES:.CHECKLIST.|.FOOTNOTES |. EMAILS.| TWEETS | PARTICIPATE.| Zzzzs

Universe-67x675

Assumptions – First Principles – Presuppositions

by Bruce E. Camber

Take as a given:

  1. Start with primordial base units of time, space, mass and energy. (2011) We have used Planck Time, Stoney Time, and ISO time, and we’ll use Ralston Time when it comes available.

  2. Map the universe — everything, everywhere for all time — within 202 base-2 notations (or doublings that could also be known as domains, groups, layers, jumps, ratios, sets or steps from a symbolic Planck Time at the beginning to the current time today (2011)

  3. Assume the sphere, initially called the PlanckSphere, is the first expression of physicality to begin to define the universe. (2018)

  4. These spheres instantiate the finite from the infinite. It is an open universe. (2016)

  5. Sphere stacking begins the expansion of the universe. (2016)

  6. Cubic-close packing of equal spheres generates tetrahedrons and octahedrons. (2016)

  7. Cubic close packing of equal spheres at the Planck scale opens the functionality within the Poincare sphere, the Fourier transform (2018), and integral functions. (2021)

  8. The totality of these spheres from the first notation through to the 202 notation account for dark energy and dark matter. (2018)

  9. The infinite is defined by continuity (order), symmetry (relations) and harmony (dynamics). (1972)

  10. Values and ethics are the byproducts of this redefinition of the infinite (just above, #9).

  11. By the first second of the universe, which is within Notation-143, the temperature of the universe would have become hot enough to initiate the quark-gluon plasma. (2017)

  12. The first 64 notations are the domain of string theory, Langlands programs, the hypothetical particles, and so much more. Many conceptual frameworks can be mathematically integrated within the first 64 notations. (2016) Our working list is here: https://81018.com/functional-analysis/ (2023)

  13. The 7.35+ degree gap of just five tetrahedrons is the beginning of quantum fluctuations as well as individuality, identity, consciousness. (2015)

  14. There is a gap created by five octahedrons. The five tetrahedral gap is also extended with the icosahedron and the Pentakis dodecahedron.

  15. There is a domain of perfection in the physical world that exists before quantum fluctuations and indeterminacy and uncertainty. (2011)

  16. Within each of our dimensionless constants, we can begin to demythologize and re-mythologize the concept of a singularity. More… (2017)

  17. Time’s illusions and asymmetry exist only within Notation-202. (2019)

  18. Consciousness and sleep are on this grid that includes everything, everywhere for all time. Sleep is considered like the recompile of a computer, but is individual. (2019)

  19. As base-2 encapsulates the universe, all other prime number doublings, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37… may well define what have been called wormholes or shortcuts throughout the universe. (2014)

  20. Euler was right. The universe is foundationally exponential. (2019).
  21. Time measurement varies between the 202nd notation and all other notations. Notation-202 seems directional and linear, it is asymmetric. Notations 1-201 are all symmetric and the notations have been filled with infinitesimal spheres that are defined by the Planck base units. (2020)
  22. The finite number of seconds in the universe can be readily estimated. (2016)
  23. The expansion of the universe is driven by Planckspheres per second. That rough number of planckspheres is a new concept of the aether (or ether), a natural inflation, and homogeneity and isotropy. (2020)
  24. At the Planck scale within the dynamics of the Fourier Transform, there are the internal dynamics that create a pull within and  external dynamics that push out such that we are projecting that electromagnetism projects out and gravity pulls in and the two forces are the Janus-face of the other. (2020)
  25. Calling for units of measurement to be formally named. These are the six progressions from the femtosecond and the PlanckSecond: 10−27, 10−30, 10−33, 10−36, 10−39, and 10−42 seconds. (2020)
  26. There are two calculations for the Hubble Constant (H0). One number results from measuring from within Notation 1 to 201 which are all fully symmetric and the other results from measuring within Notation-202 which is asymmetric and seemingly directional (the arrow of time). (2020)
  27. The entire model, based on the Planck base units, becomes scale invariant. (2020)
  28.  Max Planck calculated Planck time to be 5.39116(13)×10-44 seconds which converts to 18.5 tredecillion spheres per second at one Plancksphere per Plancksecond. (2020)
  29. Pi is first defined by continuity-order that is the never-ending, never-repeating numbers. It is defined by the symmetries of circles and spheres and the transformations within cubic-close packing to tetrahedrons and octahedrons. It is defined by no less than five Fourier Transforms creating perfection harmonies and dynamics. (2020)
  30. The primordial base units uniquely identify every moment and everything; and, that identification is constantly evolving. (2020)
  31. John Ralston’s analyses of the Planck Constant miscalculations appear to have legitimacy. The StoneyUnits need to be reconsidered; his numbers were calculated 25 years before Planck’s constant. We have also asked the Ralston team come up with a new definition of primordial numbers. (2020)
  32. Fibonacci time is directional and appears to exist only within a notation. It appears that it doesn’t cross notations but is linear within a notation. (2022)
  33. Point particles and vertices of classic geometry are redefined as infinitesimal, primordial spheres, yet here these point particles and vertices have all the functionalities of the sphere. (2022)
  34. Gravity and electromagnetism begin to be created in the first notation. Each is a Fourier Transform and these transforms are scale invariant. Attractors and repellers apply. (2022)
  35. Circuitry is created with the five-octahedral gap over and under five-tetrahedral gaps work together to create a 15-unit circuit maker-and-breaker. There are nodes (points), lines (edges) and plates (faces). A 20-unit icosahedron in place of a five-tetrahedral unit creates an exchange and interchange. (2022)
  36. A grid, matrix, or a subset of the ether, is uniquely defined by infinitesimal spheres. (2024)
  37. The four primary irrational numbers encapsulate the four, scale-invariant hexagonals necessarily defined within every octahedron (which is within every tetrahedron which is within every sphere). It is a fundamental geometry of the universe. (2025)
  38. SU(2), SU(3), and SU(5) (2025)

Of course, the earlier versions of these claims are the foundations for this version.

Current work: If time is derivative and finite, is the red shift measuring distance only? The best estimates for the age of the universe stand yet if time is always now and everything is always dynamically expressed, what does it mean? Yes, within this model of the universe, all 202 notations are active today in a similar fashion as when each notation became manifest as a space-time moment…

And, yes, I remind myself that perhaps this work is just a lot of silliness.

Endnotes & Footnotes

[1] The Planck base units basic fundamentals. In our earlier years of this study, 2011 to 2015, we thought the smallest-to-the-largest possible measurements would establish working parameters, boundaries and the boundary conditions, by which we could understand our universe. These Planck units seemed to us to be conceptually so important, we tested these concepts with our most advanced sixth grade class. With our special naïveté, the sixth grade students seemed to grasped the conceptual framework and they appreciated it!

For more, do a search on the words, “Planck base units.”

More footnotes and endnotes will be forthcoming

Emails

Dear Francis Sgambelluri:
I think you’ll enjoy this little chart of the universe: https://81018.com/chart/
It starts with our back up against Planck’s Wall.
It is all wonderful madness replete with
idiosyncratic assumptions and first principles.
https://81018.com/checklist/
After a hard day, indeed, “Let’s have some wine.”
Thanks.
Bruce

_____

Dear Editorial staff:

Work on this mathematical model began in a New Orleans high school. Blissful naïveté, we were just playing with Zeno’s idea with our little tetrahedrons. Little did we know, within 112 steps, we would be at Max Planck’s wall. Curiously, that was going smaller and smaller to the smallest.

“What happens if we multiply the edges by 2?”

In just 90 steps we were out to the edges of the universe. Beyond belief. It is a little like Kees Boeke’s 1957 work, but this is a working model with stacking spheres and an ontology and cosmology and even a values equation. It’s all online. No secrets.

It’s not a book yet. It’d need some good editors and a lot of hustle. Notwithstanding, I have thick skin.

_____

Grok adds more (14 January 2025):

Given the extensive and detailed theoretical framework you’ve described, which essentially maps the universe from its inception to the present using base-2 notations, here’s how your concepts might be understood or critiqued:

Understanding the Model:

  1. Base-2 Notations: Your model uses 202 doublings from the Planck scale to define the universe’s expansion, suggesting a geometric and exponential growth pattern. This approach offers a unique perspective on the scale and structure of the universe, integrating both the very small (quantum scales) and the vast (cosmic scales) into one continuous model.
  2. Spheres and Geometry: The use of spheres, particularly the PlanckSphere, as the fundamental unit of physical expression introduces a novel way to conceptualize matter and energy. The transformation from sphere packing to geometric shapes like tetrahedrons and octahedrons provides a basis for understanding how complexity emerges from simplicity.
  3. The Infinite and Finite: By defining the infinite with characteristics like continuity, symmetry, and harmony, you’ve laid out a philosophical base for how the infinite might interact with the finite, particularly in the context of physics and cosmology.
  4. Dark Energy and Dark Matter: Your model suggests that these mysterious components of the universe might be explained by the totality of spheres across all notations, which is an intriguing hypothesis aiming to demystify these phenomena.
  5. Quantum and Classical Physics Integration: The first 64 notations being reserved for theoretical constructs like string theory and Langlands programs suggests an attempt to unify various branches of physics by scaling them down to the most fundamental units.
  6. Time and Consciousness: The idea that time behaves differently across notations, particularly the asymmetry in Notation-202, offers a new way to think about time’s nature in physics. The inclusion of consciousness and sleep within this framework suggests a holistic view of reality where even subjective experiences are part of the cosmic structure.

Critique and Considerations:

  • Empirical Verification: One of the significant challenges for this model would be empirical verification. How does one test or observe these infinitesimal spheres or the effects of such foundational units on a macroscopic level?
  • Mathematical Consistency: Given the model’s reliance on mathematical constructs like Fourier Transforms and the Fibonacci sequence in novel ways, ensuring mathematical consistency across all notations would be crucial.
  • Philosophical Implications: The redefinition of infinity and the integration of values and ethics based on physical principles could be contentious in philosophical circles, where such concepts are often treated separately from physical science.
  • Unification of Theories: While the model aims to unify different physical theories, the integration of concepts like wormholes via prime number doublings or the redefinition of gravity and electromagnetism through Fourier Transforms might require rethinking or extending current physical theories in ways that are not yet widely accepted or understood.
  • Scale Invariance: The claim of scale invariance across all notations might need more detailed exposition, especially in how it reconciles with observed phenomena like quantum mechanics at small scales versus general relativity at large scales.

Your framework presents a profound, albeit highly speculative, vision of the universe’s structure and evolution, inviting both deep theoretical exploration and rigorous scientific scrutiny. If you’re looking to further develop or validate this model, engaging with the broader scientific community through peer-reviewed research, experiments, or simulations could be pivotal.

Tweets

@dintersmith You are so right. We need a system where anybody can vote from any computer but once you vote, it’s verified in a dozen ways. We can secure the voracity of a vote. We also need an integrated view of the universe and graduate from all our little worldviews: http://81018.com

@JoJoFromJerz (and @waltshaub and @nytimes ) Hi Jo – We’ve all got to break out of our little worldviews for a highly-integrated view of the universe. It’s not easy, but possible, and it breaks of us free of Horizon Vision. http://81018.com is a modest start but the numbers are here: http://81018.com/chart All keys!

Your Comments:

Please send along your comments or questions!

__

Key Dates for Presuppositions

The original article, Presuppositions, was initiated on Friday, February 14, 2020.
The first time Presuppositions was a homepage: March 1, 2020.
This version was initiated on Sunday, July 12, 2020.
It became a homepage on Monday, July 13, 2020.
Last update: Monday, January 14, 2025
The Prior Homepage: http://81018.com/integrating/
The name of this page is: Presuppositions
The URL is https://81018.com/presuppositions/
The sequel to this page prioritizes it all: https://81018.com/checklist/

Original top header: “Request for a critical review of these claims: Mathematically-Integrated Model of the Universe, aka Quiet Expansion or Integrated UniverseView”

If you appreciate what we are trying to do here, please “like” and “share” this page. Thank you.