**CENTER FOR PERFECTION STUDIES:** CONTINUITY•SYMMETRY•HARMONY GOALS.September,.2017

**HOMEPAGES**: ASSUMPTIONS |DARK|FORMULAS|INFINITY|Map |KEYS|REVIEW|Transformation|UP

# Breaking out of ruts of misunderstanding

## Our Hope Is Within The Integrity Of Our Young

I would add, “Yet, it’ll still take time and selling!
Dear Job: There are two pages where I prominently cite your work with Neil Turok and Jean-Luc Lehners (just above, and linked). Because the television series, The Big Bang Theory, is in its final season, there will be an increased number of discussions around the globe about the theory. And, of course, because your Neil Turok has had such a deep history with Hawking, a major focus will be on your collective work. | ## For more:The foundations first:The faces of the infinite:Let’s study the numbers:**Today’s chart (the Universe)**- Our first chart: Introduction
- Second chart: Universe Table
*Every notation to be studied*.- First article: September 2012
- Questions & Problems
- Thoughts on natural inflation
- Parsing the issues
Analyzing the numbers:*Measuring an Expanding Universe**Thrust of the Universe*- Let’s study numbers
- The Universe Clock
- Small-Human-Large Scale
- Solipsism-Narcissism-Nihilism
- Preliminary article: hypostatics
- Explore the universe?
**Big bang theory unnecessary**- Why this model until now?
Where do we go from here? |

In your work, you all say, “ Guth, Linde, and so many others of equal caliber have lamented the “bang” tag that Fred Hoyle gave it in 1949. I believe that a “quiet expansion” encapsulates the action a little more succinctly. If you have any suggestions to improve the two pages referenced above, I would be delighted. If it is all just too pedestrian for you all, I will expect this email to be ignored. My studies within cosmology are still in their earliest stages. I have a lot to learn. However, my work in ontology goes back to the early 1970s. I’ll be contacting many scientists from major universities who use the words, “According to the big bang theory…” because it is an indication that their starting points may well be incorrect. I think our biggest problems stem from another Lucasian Professor, Hawking’s predecessor, Isaac Newton and his absolute space-time. Arkani-Hamed Thank you and your team for all the work you are doing with Picard-Lefschetz theory and the rather slippery concept of a singularity. Most sincerely, Bruce ******* Bruce Camber Austin, Texas |

**Footnotes**:

1. Though I share Turok’s optimism (this link goes to the *Wired* article), there is nothing easy about selling a very different concept of the finite-infinite relation and of finite space and time.

2. Quote is directly from Job Feldbrugger’s webpages linked here.

3. **Editor’s note**: Of course, this flies in the face of bang’s infinitely hot and infinitely dense theory. The quiet expansion begins with infinitesimal measurements of time and length and very small mass and charge.

4. Go to a page of links to Arkani-Hamed’s work including the video where he makes this claim.

5. Go to a page of links to Tegmark’s work where he decries the concept of infinity.

6. Job Feldbrugge et al. Lorentzian quantum cosmology, *Physical Review D* (2017). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.103508 Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2017-06-universe-big.html#jCp

*** We are asking for your help**. There should be a tab or two, or more, just below to share this document. For example, if you have a Twitter account, a link to it should appear just below. If more than one tab appears, please click on at least one of them. Let’s get a discussion going about this topic.