The two Standard Models converge through base-2 notation.

JWST: “The Big Bang Needs A Fix.”
Our World Can Grasp The Universe
with a natural expansion of natural units.
by Bruce E. Camber

Abstract. Images from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) have opened new parts of our universe for our world to behold. It also mapped places where our scholars and scientists were not expecting to find galaxy formations approaching 300 million years from the start. Proposed is that these new images and data can be reconciled with both our Standard Models through a most-simple base-2 exponential notation, a natural inflation defined by natural units as calculated by Planck, Stoney, or the ISO. Here is a natural bridge between the Standard Model for Cosmology and the Standard Model for Particle Physics. The smoothness found by the JWST and the earlier space telescopes is also addressed. Our realists know that the statement, “…after the Big Bang” will have yet another meaning.

(Please note: There is more to come based on the 6 September 2023 issue of the London-based publication, New Scientist. It has three related articles (eight authors) that explore these open mysteries.^[*] Our thanks to the editors and writers of the New Scientist, -BEC

The old big-bang theory needs room to breathe: A possible update to the big bang theory is an exponential expansion from the Planck base units or today’s equivalent. It’s the first moment in time to this day, the Now. That renders just 202 base-2 notations of which the first 64 notations are too small to be measured by any scientific instrumentation. The basic concept has not been entertained within any of the major scientific publications.¹ Scholars looking for a New Physics focus too much on particles, not on equations, geometries, natural units and dimensionless constants. We do need to get Beyond the Standard Model as currently defined.² We can take obvious little steps first. There are more than enough options to begin expanding it today.³

Our Standard Models can be extended with no less than 64 base-2 notations from the Planck scale to the electroweak scale. The first definition is of the base units, then each doubling. Also there is an infrastructure of math already in place; Langlands programs and the studies of strings, supersymmetries (SUSY), hypothetical particles, conformal gravity, and many others⁴ need these 64 notations to participate. All those studies could add details about the initial natural units from the equivalent of Planck’s base units to our electroweak interactions.

So many scholars and scientists have vested their lifetime into trying to define their work within the bounds of big bang cosmology. Some day we’ll each remember when it was that we began to believe that our universe began with an “infinitely-small, infinitely-hot, infinitely-dense point.” One of the last times Stephen Hawking summarized his points was in 2016 on PBS-TV (Genius).⁵

In the new light of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), another change to the Standard Model for Particle Physics is to replace the Guth inflation with a natural inflation⁶ from the Planck scale. There is less than a second’s difference between the two inflations so the results of most of the work by our scholars and scientists is largely correct. The big bang timeline is largely correct. The epochs defined by the Big Bang and used by the Lambda CDM are ostensibly identical. Check it out. A second’s difference affects no one’s work.

The third change is the definition of what is present at the start. With the big bang, everything in the universe is compressed to a virtual singularity. In this emergent model, a most-simple infinitesimal sphere defines the first moment of space-time.⁷

Big Bang cosmology, as-it-is, is so ingrained within science today, apparently none of our thought leaders have checked the numbers to see what a natural inflation would look like from the Planck scale. I believe that the more it is analyzed, the more logical it will become, especially among our scholars. Simplicity seems to always come before complexity; and, an infinitesimal sphere is simple. Cubic-close packing of equal spheres generates tetrahedrons, octahedrons and basic structures, and particles and waves quickly follow.

This emergent process has its challenges. A natural inflation challenges our commonsense logic, especially our understanding of infinity and time. Now, the concept of infinity has been so argued (and it appears that most of us are quite tired of it), our approach to infinity was through our analysis of spheres and its pi (π). There are three qualities of pi that are not quantitative, discrete, and finite. These are continuity-symmetry-harmony. These are qualities and these qualitative processes seem boundless, perhaps infinite. We decided given the history of abuse to ignore standard concepts of infinity and to ascribe these three qualities as the primaries, the starting points, for all things, everywhere for all time. It seems to work. Of course, starting the universe with the oldest, most ubiquitous and versatile equation was fortuitous. And the more we lived with it, the more we liked it. But, there were other challenges.

Time is best understood like Carlo Rovelli’s Now. There have been many distinguished people who have said that all time is now. ⁸ We came to this conclusion from watching the evolution of the 202 base-2 notations. One could see how the concept of one plancksphere per unit of Planck Length and Planck Time created a huge thrust of particles that were building on each other. No particle got old; they all built on each other, and logic tells us that they do so to this day. When we compared its natural inflation to the big bang, the disparity was about a picosecond. Again, please look at the chart. You may have insights that we could-and-would never even dream.

There is also a domain of perfection. And, there is also a geometry of imperfections. Both have been discussed in many places throughout this website. Quantum fluctuations have a geometry.

And just because there has been so much investment in accelerators around the world, we’ll need a new vision for them that probably will not involve smashing. Perhaps being a little too whimsical, maybe accelerators can be used for harmonizing spins states, to begin to discern higher levels of integration that involve those first 64 notations.

Of course, there will be even more whimsical ideas.

Conclusions for now. The world is desperate for a new model that could help reopen dialogue about our foundations of understanding. This model is a new wrinkle on space, time and infinity; I beg your patience. It is idiosyncratic, nevertheless we can hope that it helps to reopen dialogues to understanding. Thank you. -BEC

_____

This page is https://81018.com/standard-models/

_____

Endnotes & Footnotes
In process: Not many because all these points already have pages within this website…

[*] Abstract. Every major science publication in the world will be keep an eye on the results coming in from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). It is an ongoing revolution that continues to raise fundamental questions without necessary answers.

[1] Major Scientific Publications. We are making a study of authors and publishers of articles that grab our attention. For our preceding homepage, our analysis was based of the Scientific American article in September 2022. The New Scientist articles from September 6, 2023 are used for this homepage.

Key Authors (three articles), New Scientist, Sept. 2023:
• Jon Butterworth (NS), Alex Keshavarzi (NS), Clare Burrage (NS), Surjeet Rajendran (NS), Emily Adlam and Matt Strassler, Six ways we could finally find new physics beyond the standard model
• Abigail Beall, An alternative way to picture the standard model of particle physics
• Jon Cartwright, A brief history of the standard model, our theory of almost everything

[2] This homepage is built on the Jon Butterworth homepage. There are always many successive approximations to get focused on key issues. If you have read the Butterworth article, you have already seen much of this page. Your comments are always most welcomed.

[3] Expanding our physics today. If, for example, the leader of CERN laboratories, Fabiola Gianotti, were to empower her people to look at those first 64 notations, the dynamics within the universe would begin changing immediately. There are several continuity equations reaching from Notation 1-to-202. There are the never-ending, never-repeating numbers of pi ( π ), the perfectly-fitting geometries of the tetrahedron-octahedron, the harmonic functions of the Fourier transform building on each other, and more. Continued study of this exploration is a key part of this work.

[4] Not on the old grid but a key to this grid. Of course, there is a place for every discipline on the new grid. The big-bang was in the way of so-so many of them. Once these disciplines adopt the base-2 notations that reach across 202 notations creating a grid of infinitesimal spheres, they’ll begin to identify places for their work within that grid. Each discipline holds keys to grasping the fullness of our universe.

[5] In Hawking’s time, you would have been laughed out of the room if you did not affirm the big bang. Humor, joy and a lack of pomposity are keys to the future. Arrogance is the bane of progress within the sciences. There is so much of it, Max Planck was moved to say, “…science advances one funeral at a time.”

[6] There is inflation, and real inflation, and really-real inflation. Not even his family understood Alan Guth’s inflation. He had a difficult time convincing the masses, but at some point that tide turned. I am hoping that a natural inflation will be more compelling to people as we learn about our universe.

[7] The first moment of space-time. Dimensionless constants and natural numbers are a powerful combination. These facets of reality do not exist in spacetime but create spacetime. (In process)

[8] The Now, Photons, Continuities-Symmetries-Harmonies. What is time? Is there a fast path across the 202 notations? Are there possible new ways to think about how we are all connected? Is there a grid of planckspheres that are ostensibly binding all things for all time?

We are going to study really photons. Who has the most far-reaching insights?

We are going to really study the evolution and application of accelerators. It has become a fine science since 1929 when Ernest Lawrence initiated the very first cyclotron in the world at the University of California, Berkeley.

_____

Much more work to come…this is the period when we ask for feedback and make updates! -BEC

_____

References & Resources
As references are studied, the key references and resources will be added to this page here.

1. Michael Silberstein, W. M. Stuckey, Timothy McDevitt, Beyond the Dynamical Universe: Unifying Block Universe Physics and Time as Experienced, Oxford (2018); Website: https://www.relationalblockworld.com/ (link has known security problems); ArXiv articles: Mysteries” of Modern Physics and the Fundamental Constants c, h, and G, (October 2021)

2. Wikipedia: Tetrahedral-octahedral honeycomb

3. The UniverseClock: The simple logic that created the UniverseClock is the same logic that guides the logic for a grid or matrix of infinitesimal spheres that defines the universe that defines all time and space. In this chart our universe is somewhere around 436,117,076,600,000,000 seconds old. That is in-and-around 13.82 billion years.

4. James Webb Space Telescope Images Challenge Theories of How Universe Evolved, UT News, April 13, 2023

5. JWST early Universe observations and ΛCDM cosmology, Rajendra P Gupta, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 524, Issue 3, September 2023, Pages 3385f, doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad2032

6. Bright, early galaxies surprise astronomers,” Kelly Kizer Whitt, Earth-Sky, November 18, 2022.

7. Is the Photon Really a Particle? V.2 (PDF), Paul A. Kelvgard, Sandia Lab, 2021

_____

Emails There will be emails to many of our scholars about key points.

Huda Yahya Zoghbi, 24 October 2023, Baylor School of Medicine, Houston
Clare Burrage, 21 October 2023, Nottingham
Joel Leja, 20 October 2023, Penn State, State College
Alex Keshavarzi, 20 October 2023, University of Manchester, England
Halena Abramowicz, 17 October 2023, Tel Aviv University
Rajendra P Gupta, 17 October 2023. Ottawa
Amanda Pagul , 17 October 2023, STSI, Maryland
Kelly Kizer Whitt, 17 October 2023, Earth-Sky, Austin, Texas
Michael Boylan-Kolchin, 13 October, UT-Austin
Kurt Riesselmann, 12 October 2023, Fermilab, Chicago
Michael Duff, 11 October 2023, Imperial College, London
George Ellis, 11 October 2023, University of Cape Town
Will Kinney, 10 October 2023, SUNY-Buffalo
Katherine Freese, 10 October 2023, UT-Austin
Fabiola Gianotti, 9 October 2023, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland

_____

IM There will also be many instant messages to thought leaders about these key points.

5:24 PM · Oct 23, 2023 @vonderleyen (Ursula von der Leyen, President, European Union) You need to inspire people to be bold and creative, to think about new ideas out of their own expertise, and to act on those ideas. We each have a sliver of genius. Help each person to cultivate their sliver! See: Foundations Within Foundations.