We all make mistakes…


Worst Consistent Mistake In Science

by Bruce Camber

Arrogance: It blinds us from further analysis and reflection. Even the most arrogant can decide not to arrogant. Within science arrogance has given us a Big Bang Cosmology that is considered a fact, not just theory.  Yet, it has always been “just a theory.”  It is rather strangely interwoven with Newton’s overly confident definition of absolute space and time (quite possibly the all-time worst mistake) and Einstein’s special theory of relativity. If Newton had stretched for a higher level of generality but with more meaningful specificity, he may have started a real discussion with Gottfried Leibniz. Is it possible that the concept of time, while being inextricably interwoven with space,  could be order-continuity? Could the concept of space, while being inextricably interwoven with time, be relations-symmetries?

These possibilities are being analyzed. [1]

Today’s big bang cosmology has put blinders on the the entire theoretical physics community and limits the creativity of people like those at CERN labs in Geneva. It has shut down discussion and openness to other theories and that stunts the growth of science.[2]

First, there is a growing list of questions[3] that big bang cosmology has not addressed. Wikipedia has a bit more background. There are also many highly-respected scholars, academics, scientists and researchers who object to its dominance.[4] Big bang cosmology has survived only because there has not been a stronger, more compelling alternative theory.

But, that just may be changing.

In December 2011 a simple and totally predictive chart of numbers began to emerge.[5] Alongside base-2 exponentiation, this progression has a natural inflation that begins with the original four Planck base units (time/ length and mass/energy) at the first moment of creation and progresses to the current time in just over 202 doublings or notations.[6]

This progression of numbers is a virtual script that defines each of the big bang epochs more precisely than the epochs of big bang cosmology, yet it requires no “big bang.”[7]  Following each of those doublings from Planck Time is pivotal; within this scale of the universe, the first second falls between notations 143 and 144.[8] The first day is between notations 160 and 161. And, the first year is between notations 168 and 169. Large structure formation at 150 million years is within notations 196 to 197.

What happens in that first second of creation will go a long way to answering key questions about isotropy-and-homogeneity and about dark energy and dark matter. It brings into question the roll of geometry, simple math and simple logic. It also reopens the Leibniz-Newton debate about the nature of space and time and the infinite.

The particle people will say that notations 2 to 65 have no physical significance. They would be correct. Things within that range are not physical by any standards or conventions that we follow today. This is the domain for systems theory, ontology, Langlands programs, pointfree geometries, scalar field theory, automata theory, and more. Thank you.

Endnote: This response, an answer to a Quora question on January 24, 2017, will be reviewed and updated as we learn more. More…

[1] This earliest parts of this quest began in 1972.
[2] Letters to a scientist: Fabiola Gianotti, Directeur Général, CERN
[3] These open, unanswered questions are now mounting up as the failures and contortions of big bang inflation become self-evident to more and more.
[4] Perhaps the protests formally began in 1991 when Eric Lerner first published his book, The Big Bang Never Happened.
[5] This model, initially considered to be just an excellent Science-Technology-Engineering-Mathematics (STEM) tool, requires further study, especially of the first 67 notations. It all still requires out-of-the-box thinking.
[6] The most recent chart with five Planck base units.
[7] Precision ontology can work with Hubble/Planck precision cosmology.
[8] Over two-thirds of the universe is well-defined within the first second.

Other Stories


Objections from around the world
The Big Bang Boom Is Over

1. There is a more simple model that uses base-2 notation that is entirely mathematically-and- geometrically predictive.
2. This simple model captures each of the currently-defined big bang epochs and all that science without the need for a bang.
3. This model uses the same process that drives all biological processes, a natural inflation, that starts at the instant the universe began and proceeds to this very moment.

Open for your comments:
The Numbers: A horizontally-scrolled chart
More Numbers: The Universe From Scratch
Value values, ethics and integrity
Big Bang Cosmology: #10 Bully #9 False Start #8 Hot head

Help Wanted

Your Questions/Our Answers: Ask a question about this work, especially about the chart, and we will attempt to answer it!
To the Top Guns of Physics: What’s wrong with this picture?
Sample of One of Many Different Tweets:
To Our Pop Stars: Appeal to Katy Perry, “Become a spokesperson.”

Prior Homepage…

Access To A Few More Homepages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12