Walter D. van Suijlekom, Institute for Mathematics, Astrophysics and Particle Physics
Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
ArXiv: A survey of spectral models of gravity coupled to matter, 2019
Homepage: University
inSPIREHEP
Twitter
Wikipedia: Noncommutative standard model
YouTube
Most recent (third) email: 15 October 2022 at 3:07 PM
Dear Prof. Dr. Walter D. van Suijlekom:
Over a year ago I sent you a brief note. Before I do, I take all my research, primarily references to articles and videos, and save them. When that page can be helpful to others, I post it on our website. Our page about your work is here: https://81018.com/suijlekom/ (this page).
Over time, I continue to add and update it based on the amount of traffic to that page. Currently I am also integrating it with references to Connes, Chamseddine, SSM, etc..
Within our 202 base-2 notations, a map or outline of the universe, the first 64 notations define a domain which is not formally recognized within academia, yet it has already been defined by those, the many, who are not on the grid. I ask somewhat rhetorically, could the first 64 notations be the infamous missing link between relativity and quantum theory?
Could we have cracked open a new door or is it all just poppycock and simplistic nonsense?
I had noticed some activity on our website on my page about your work, so I have been updating it a bit: https://81018.com/suijlekom/ (Again, that link goes to this page).
If you ever want anything updated, advise me and it’ll be done!
Thank you for all that you do.
Warmly,
Bruce
PS. Though I explained in my earlier notes, this particular strain of my work originated within the naiveties of a high school geometry class. It needs some critical review — some simple validation that it is possible or some clear censure that it is impossible. I would welcome either! -BEC
Second email: August 5, 2021, 3:30 PM Update: 15 October 2022
Dear Prof. Dr. Walter D. van Suijlekom:
Surely I have a long way to go regarding the work of Connes, Chamseddine, and van Suijlekom, but I have started, it is helpful, and I am learning. My work started on the EPR-Bell formulas way back in 1972-1980. It seemed like I was going in circles and making very little progress. In 2011 in a high school geometry class, I unwittingly returned to those earlier inquiries. We had just mapped the universe using Planck’s base units and by applying base-2 notation to outline everything-everywhere-for-all-time in just 202 doublings.
The embedded links are: (1) https://81018.com/bec/#Narrative, (2) https://81018.com/home/, (3).https://81018.com/stem/ and (4) https://81018.com/chart/.
It was a novelty for many years. A new STEM tool! (https://81018.com/stem/)
Now, having thought about it for awhile, looking at the progression of numbers, it is a model that easily encapsulates the big bang epochs. The natural inflation is natural. There is a domain of about 64 notations that is a precursor to quantum formalism and it welcomes string theory, Langlands programs, and other mathematical disciplines without a place on the grid.
We need to engage the entire universe throughout all time to begin to see things more clearly. Thank you for your work. With these pages, you are now among a group of scholars whom I follow most closely.
Is it all just poppycock and simplistic nonsense, or could we have opened a new door?
Warmly,
Bruce
First email: Mar 13, 2021, 9:09 PM
Dear Prof. Dr. Walter D. van Suijlekom:
My Pi Day Greeting to you all: https://81018.com/challenge/
Gentlemen:
Congratulations on your Spectral Standard Model. It seems we may be going over some of the same grounds, however you all are scholars and ostensibly I am a high school person who happened to slide down into Alice’s rabbit hole and looked up from the Planck base units thinking, “How am I going to figure this out?”
I have previously communicated with the ACs and now with this note, with your third expert, Walter van Suijlekom. Also, I am now starting to engage the work of Viatcheslav Mukhanov. It looks as if he may be an occasional associate of your group.
You all are doing such marvelous work, I am now attempting to hire a tutor to be sure I am understanding you all correctly. Thank you for all that you do.
Warmly,
Bruce
PS. I had also arrived at the volume of the universe ∼1060 in Planck units using 539 tredecillion units per second (Plank Time) over the current age of the universe in seconds. A coincidence? Significant? Thank you.
-BEC
Based on this prior email to Ali Chamseddine: Mon, Mar 8, 11:00 AM
“At present the volume of the universe is ∼1060 in Planck units.” Our simple calculations renders similar results: https://81018.com/instance/#PlanckSpheres
Current references to your work on this site: https://81018.com/instance/#10f https://81018.com/instance/#Spectral
The universe is a fascinating place; there are so many angles from which to observe it. Thanks again for all your work.
-Bruce
###
Worldviews limit perspective 