Casey Luskin

Note from Bruce Camber: The seemingly natural divisions of the 200 notations is one half, then one third, then one fourth, and so on. At notation 100 there is the width of hair. Just below it is the size of a human egg. Just above it, there is the size that includes human sperm. This chart is a focus on life. Dividing by three, the first 67 notations are the very small scale, pre-particles, where we focus on ratios. At notation 134 we are in the range of the International Space Station when directly overhead. At 201 we come up to the current time and the age of the universe. I would enjoy the comments of somebody who is informed within the Discovery Institute.

Casey Luskin CV: http://www.discovery.org/p/188
http://discoveringid.org/authors/
http://www.caseyluskin.com/

March 2017

Dear Casey:

Back 1959 — being 12 years old at that time — I began asking questions about the Nicene formula, especially the fully man and fully God part. I had grown up in the Episcopal and United Methodist churches and I held back from my cohort when it came time for confirmation. I continued questioning until 1971. Through my study of perfected states in space-time, a new journey began and that old triune formula took a very different direction.

Within a moment of perfection, I began studying order-continuity, relations-symmetries, and dynamics-harmony. That took a very different direction in 2011; with a bunch of high school geometry students, we used base-2 notation to outline the universe in 202 notations from the Planck scale to the Age of the Universe. https://81018.com/chart/

Although we immediately thought of it as a STEM tool, we didn’t know what we were doing. It seemed important so we started writing down our thoughts. One student even made it a science fair project.

You can see from the 2015 email (below) that Kelley Unger referred me to you.
Since the time of that note, I have inched along; all our articles are being consolidated and updated

Given big bang cosmology’s many peculiarities, shouldn’t we still be asking,
“Is there a better theory?” Of course, it would be quite unlikely to come out of a high school geometry class. Notwithstanding, we may have backed into something. Those 202 notations define a quiet inflation. In this model, the universe is just over one second old at notation 144. Though encouraged by the deep nature of continuity and symmetry and the role of mathematics, we have been fishtailing looking for someone who’ll say, “You just may have something here” or even “That’s a dead end” would help.

We started posting things in 2012 on blogs on the web. In September 2016,
we began consolidating all that writing to one site: http://81018.com
https://81018.com/chart is the one page with all the raw numbers.
Might you take a look to see if it could be of interest? Thanks.

Most sincerely,
-Bruce
******************
Bruce Camber
https://81018.com/home
http://81018.com
Sent: Monday, September 07, 2015 3:14 PM
To: Kelley Unger
Subject: Thanks for your recent email….

Kelley,

Would you do me a small favor and take a quick look at this article,
and give me your first impression? It’s a bit of a stretch…
https://81018.com/simple/ (new link, same article)

If it is at all intriguing, it has a brief history:
https://81018.com/order/ (new link, same article)

Thanks.

Bruce
New Orleans
——————
Bruce Camber
Center for Perfection Studies

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.