@kanyewest You are very smart
and know there is too much that we don't know.
We're off -- intellectually off,
emotionally off, and ethically off.
Let's see if there is a better starting point.
Here's a simple model of the entire universe.
Professor of Astrophysics
Institute for Advanced Study
School of Natural Sciences
Princeton, New Jersey 08540
First email: 9 May 2018 12 Noon
Subject: Heating mechanism within a simple mathematical (base-2) model of the universe
Dear Prof. Dr. Matias Zaldarriaga:
Congratulations on a most impressive scholarly career.
The best of the best.
It is a simple bit of logic that rendered a simple, highly-integrated,
mathematical view of the universe albeit entirely idiosyncratic.
It came out of a STEM effort within a high school in 2011.
What if we were to back away from the two Lucasian Professors,
Newton and Hawking, the infinitely-hot and infinitely-dense within
Newton’s absolute plenum of time, and start fresh with just
the Planck base units, using base-2 or period-doubling bifurcation,
go out the 202 notations to the current time whereby every notation
is still at work so the arrow of time is just a local notational phenomena?
Too simple? Maybe so, but our cosmological “processes” are rather
consistent with the history of the Standard Model for Lambda-CDM Cosmology.
Doesn’t simplicity rule? Isn’t there a place for elegance and beauty?
Doesn’t Euler’s identity apply to the universe?
Here’s my seven year ride on this little wagon: https://81018.com/growth
Comments? Thank you.
We can’t just stand by and hope for the best.
This website — https://81018.com — was started to explore a new foundation for thinking about the universe and who we are.
If we start from the Planck scale and just double it over and over again, we come up to the current time and size of the universe in just 202 doublings. https://81018.com/chart/
There is a certain logic and mathematics involved that circumscribes Newton’s concept of space and time so both are finite, quantized, derivative and certainly not absolute. That is a major shift in our perspective of life and ourself. Because nobody has yet debunked it since we started on December 19, 2011 — https://81018.com/home/ — it requires further study.
The homepage is always the most current work: https://81018.com/
What do we do now?
What’s the next step?
I would love to hear from you.
Bruce Camber’s Sister-in-law
First email: Sunday, 29 April 2018
Let’s see if we can get inside the story known as the Wheat & Chessboard.*
It is a simple-but-mind-boggling story. Although there are many other
versions of the story, I think this version of the story the best:
It does the expansion in pennies and you end up with over
$184,467,440 trillion dollars. Just to put that in context,
in 2017 the global debt of all the nations, all companies,
and all people was estimated to be $215 trillion.
You could pay off everyone’s debt everywhere and hardly
knew you did! That’s the beginning of the mind boggling.
Now, our chart of the universe is a lot like the chessboard
but instead of 64 squares, we have 202 and that just about
accounts for everything everywhere in the universe!
Crazy, isn’t it?
And I guess one has to be a little crazy to be thinking about
such things…. it is all quite simple if we slow down
a little and think about it. Because I know you are very good
with numbers, why not think about it a little?
Be well. Give my brother a squeeze!
PS. Access to this story is with many of my letters to scholars right here:
https://81018.com/alphabetical/#R. You’ll see your name under the “R’s”.
* The URL for the first link is to a page in Wikipedia:
Department of Geography
College of Urban and Environmental Sciences,
Peking University, Beijing 100871, PR China
Key Quote: “This suggests that the origin of bifurcation and chaos is two-population coupling and interaction rather than intrinsic randomicity of determinate models.”
First email: 21 April 2018
Dear Prof. Dr. Yanguang Chen:
Reading your ArXiv papers, particularly Reinterpreting the Origin of Bifurcation and Chaos by Urbanization Dynamics (2017), whereby “the 2-dimensional rural-urban coupling map can create the same bifurcation and chaos patterns as those from the 1-dimensional logistic map.”
I wonder if you might think about a very interesting progression created by doubling the Planck base units, then doubling each new value. Once doubled 202 times, Planck Time has gone from the first moment of time to this very day: https://81018.com/chart
It would seem such a progression opens more questions than answers, yet it embraces chaos, I believe, in a more fundamental manner than the urbanization measurement and this progression calls to question the conclusion that “the whole trajectory expands infinitely in the region between two radicals. ”
May I call you for a discussion?
Bifurcation/chaos homepage: https://81018.com/imagination