The structure is the same. The particulars are different.

Yellow ArrowRightArrowYellowCENTER FOR PERFECTION STUDIES: CONTINUITYSYMMETRYHARMONY GOALS.January.2020
PAGES: ASSUMPTIONS |DARK|FORMULAS|INFINITY| Map|KEYS|RELATIONS|Transformation|UP

A Much More Simple Model

by Bruce Camber  Initially posted: December 31, 2019 Version 1 Version 2   Version 3

An unlikely approach to consciousness, sleep,
and basic questions

The finite-infinite relation has been consistently-and-badly abused by people throughout the millennia. The concept of infinity was the key problem so mathematically rigorous work-arounds were developed to avoid it altogether. Back in 1970, I thought infinity could be defined as: (1)_continuity (renders order), (2)_symmetry (renders relations), (3)_harmony (renders dynamics). My studies of scientific anomalies and quantum fluctuations, opened questions about possible transformations between the finite and infinite. My hypothesis was, that if taken together, the three would necessarily define a moment of perfection.

Yet, with no framework, those concepts were just a feel-good, “holiday-collection” of words.

In 2011, by applying base-2 exponentiation starting at the Planck base units, we discovered 202 notations or doublings to encapsulate the finite universe, everything, everywhere, for all time. Finally… a framework! There were several continua defined that appeared to open new insights into some of our most basic questions.

New academic insights are difficult, yet when one begins to grasp these continua, the largest possible for space-time and matter-energy, exploring new possibilities is easier.
Continued (entire article)…

Caution…a working, first-draft.

Restrained Response

We started our base-2 work back in December 2011. A simple mathematical model, it appeared to have been unexplored by the academic community so we began asking some key scholars our key question:

“…just simple math and logic but the results are so idiosyncratic. What are we doing wrong?”

Arkani-Hamed
Arkani-Hamed

Of the scholars who challenge basic assumptions about space and time, Nima Arkani-Hamed, can be difficult to understand yet his work is held in high regard among academics.

Turok-Neil
Turok

Nima, Neil Turok and Max Tegmark challenge us all yet absolute space and time (Newton) seems be to holding its ground.

Mansoora Shamin
Shamin

We began looking at the next generation of scholars who might question Newton’s absolutes. People like Mansoora Shamin have been boldly speculative.

Freese1
Freese

Scholars like Katherine Freese of Michigan have key insights but she appears to hold onto Newton’s absolutes. Simple is never simple.

The base-2 model of the universe. We are asking simple questions! Here’s the most recent. Do you have an insight?_ More Scholars…

Tweet to Neil deGrasse Tyson

Tyson
Tyson

Jan 11, 2020 @neiltyson Can we call to question Newton’s absolute space and time? Maybe so. If Planck’s base units are taken to be the very first moment of physical time, there are no absolutes: https://81018.com/eight-one It’s all finite and quantitative. A simple model: https://81018.com/chart/

Open up your universe

Basic concepts and simple facts

__________________________________________

Key studies with this site:

_____________________________________