The New from The Old

by Bruce Camber  Initially posted: December 31, 2019 Version 1 Version 2   Version 3

An unlikely approach
to consciousness, sleep,
and basic questions

The finite-infinite relation has been consistently-and-badly abused by people throughout the millennia. The concept of infinity was the key problem so mathematically rigorous  “work-arounds“ were developed to avoid it altogether. Back in 1970, I thought infinity could be defined as: (1)_continuity (renders order), (2)_symmetry (renders relations), (3)_harmony (renders dynamics). My studies of scientific anomalies and quantum fluctuations, opened questions about possible transformations between the finite and infinite. My hypothesis was, that if taken together, the three would necessarily define a moment of perfection.

Yet, with no framework, those concepts were just a feel-good, “holiday-collection” of words.

In 2011, by applying base-2 exponentiation starting at the Planck base units, we discovered 202 notations or doublings to encapsulate the finite universe, everything, everywhere, for all time. Finally… a framework! There were several continua defined that appeared to open new insights into some of our most basic questions.

New academic insights are difficult, yet when one begins to grasp these continua, the largest possible for space-time and matter-energy, exploring new possibilities is easier.
Continued (entire article)…
Caution…a working, first-draft.

On Getting Scholarly Advice

When we started our base-2 work back in December 2011, we asked some of the best scholars in the world our key question:

“What are we doing wrong? It is all just simple math and logic but the results are so idiosyncratic…”

We started with people who would quickly know, people like Stephen Hawking and MIT’s Alan Guth. They were sure of themselves. They had answers. They were leaders.

Everybody seemed to follow them. But, they had no answers for us. There are no easy answers… so they were too busy to reply. Plus, we are nobody from nowhere special.

We also asked friends and family. It was a puzzle! And not wanting to appear foolish, they most often deferred to the experts, scholars like Michael Green.

More recently we have begun asking scholars like Karen Crowther whose writing helps us grasp more of the essence of physics, cosmology, and especially mathematics.

Tweet to Rep. Maxine Waters

Jan 8, 2020: @RepMaxineWaters We all need a “time out.” Our old mindset moves us closer to dystopia where everything is an object; nothing is a relation. That’s been wrong since Newton! https://81018.com/bridge/

Here’s a new frame of reference — an integrated view of ourselves and our universe. https://81018.com

Open up your universe

• First, engage the logic; necessarily, there is a finite-infinite passageway.
• Second, Lighten up your life! We can all grasp a new space-time.
• Third, know these two faces of light: matter-energy (and you).
• Fourth, no dark matter and dark energy – it’s a continuum.

Basic concepts and simple facts

• Speed of light mathematically defined. So, what is the nature of light?
• Our base-2 exponential model (goes to a little history). Mathematically-
  integrated universe in just 202 notations (the actual numbers).
• Absolutes go back in the box.
• Sphere stacking, tetrahedrons, and octahedrons come out of the box.

__________________________________________

Key studies with this site:

• Planck Time to this day
• Newton, Leibniz, Finite-Infinite
• Key missing pieces of our puzzle
• A Map of the Universe
• Mathematical Model of the Universe
• We’ve been “top down” too long.
• The Most-Basic Transformations
• Integrated Structure of the Universe
• Key assumptions about this universe

_____________________________________