PERFECTION STUDIES: CONTINUITY• SYMMETRY• HARMONY GOALS Summer 2025
PAGES: Breakthrough! | REFERENCES | RE-READING | EMAILS | IM | CRITIQUE | Zzzz
Five key observations change the paradigm.
by Bruce. E. Camber (in process)
Here are four top scholars who could.
George F.W. Ellis. In 1972 as post-docs at Cambridge University, Ellis co-authored with Stephen Hawking the 404-page book, The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time. It de facto set a standard for talking about space-time. Hawking hardened his position. Ellis explored other possibilities.
Phiala Shanahan (PhD. 2015), professor with MIT’s Center for Theoretical Physics, MIT Laboratory for Nuclear Science, and NSF AI Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Fundamental Interactions (IAIFI) is asking the age-old question, “What are the fundamental building blocks of the universe?”
Gerardus ‘t Hooft (PhD, 1972) has had a distinguished career in theoretical physics. He became a Nobel laureate (1999) but in 2025 for Scientific American, they quoted him saying, “Quantum physics is nonsense.” Toned down a little, now it’s “Quantum Physics Is on the Wrong Track.”
Marcia McNutt is President of the National Academy of Sciences and Chair of National Research Council, Washington, DC. . From 2013 to 2016 she was the Editor-in-chief of Science magazine which inspired her “…to accelerate the pace of scientific discovery by improving interdisciplinary scientific communication…”
Pi, phi, Euler’s number, and the square-root of 2
____
Five key calculations may be the building blocks of a different theory
Resources
As references are added, other resources will also be added within this website.
[1] The 202 base-2 Notations. That chart, from the first moment in time defined by Planck units to the current Time within Notation-202, has not been formally and critically reviewed within a peer-reviewed journal. It was our first calculation in December 2011. It has less than a second’s difference with the Big Bang theory and the Standard Models.
[2] The 18.5 tredecillion infinitesimal spheres defined by the Planck Time and the other base units. The logic of one infinitesimal sphere per unit of Planck Time and Planck Length will be argued and explored. Then, the simple calculation of 18.5 tredecillion spheres per second will eventually be confirmed by other than Grok.
[3] Speed, density and spin at Notation-1. The shape and conditions by which the first sphere defines the first moment of space-time will open the foundations of homogeneity and isotropy and introduce the concept of perfected states in space-time. Notation-0 is a key where logic prevails and gives us Notation-1 and then Notation-2 and all 200 that follow.
[4] The four “hyper-rational” irrationals, π–e–√2–φ. Within all octahedrons are four intrinsic hexagonal plates. Might these plates be the first physical manifestations of π, e,√2, and φ? It is a discussion that was opened, perhaps for the first time, on 4 March 2025. Can all four be logically applied across all notations? The academic disciplines of combinatorics, cellular automaton, cubic close packing, bifurcation theory, Langlands programs, mereotology, and point-free geometry, may begin to inform.
[5] The 7.356° angular deficit that becomes systemic, a variable around the 60th notation. Although Aristotle threw us off for 1800 years, it really amounted to more than 2400 years before a Dutch mathematician, Dirk Struik (arriving from Rome to Boston, then to MIT) in 1926 finally had his article, “De Impletione Loci,” published. It made a difference. In 2012 Lagarias and Zong made reference to “De Impletione Loci” in their work, Mysteries in Packing Regular Tetrahedra (PDF), American Mathematical Society (AMS). That article is making a difference especially given it was published by the AMS. It has taken this long to recover from a mistake that was made in a reference in the De Caelo (On the Heavens) [Aristotle (384 BCE – 322 BCE), written 350 BCE, translated by John Leofric Stocks, Oxford, 1922. Online, page 306 b, 8.5 (page 126 of 250)]. And, we have not fully recovered from Aristotle’s mistake. The process is ongoing.
Hopefully, it will not take as long to recover from all of our big bang mistakes.
These five key calculations we all could learn relatively quickly.
_____
Reading and re-reading
What is opened on the desk, on the shelves and on the floor
- Durham University Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology: I have asked, “Are there any studies of Notations-1-to-67? Back in 2021, I enjoyed learning about their graduate students helped Sir Peter Higgs when he became ill; they jumped in and did his lecture! Their PASCOS conference of 2025 is coming up soon (Jul 21 – 25, Durham); it’s a who’s who of scholars within particle physics who are giving the presentations! It’s not to be confused with the other series also titled,
- Beyond the Standard Model: Exploring the study of Notations-1-to-67.
- Mathematical and physical constants:
- John Baez has been aware of this site longer than anyone else. He suggested that the idea of a base-2 chart of the universe based on Planck units was idiosyncratic but would not offer any more insights. Our first initial study constants were of his 21 constants. https://81018.com/2011/04/04/baez/#Constants
- Frank Wilczek, Anthony Aguirre, Martin Reiss, and Max Tegmark with 26 constants
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
_____
Emails
There will be emails to many of our scholars about key points.
3 June 2025, Hannah Fry, Queens’ College, Cambridge University, England UK
3 June 2025, Ed Witten, IAS, Princeton, NJ
3 June 2025, Ritika Nagpal, University of Delhi, New Delhi,India
3 June 2025, Stephon Alexander, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
3 June 2025, Chandra Prescod-Weinstein, UNH, Durham, NH
3 June 2025, Paul Steinhardt, Princeton University, NJ
31 May 2025, John Carlos Baez, University of California, Riverside
31 May 2025, L. Enkh-Amgalan, Ministry of Education and Science, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
28 May 2025: Manjul Bhargav, Princeton University, NJ
_____
IM
There will also be many instant messages to thought leaders about these key points.
7 June 2025, Neom: “If Neom truly wants to lead the world in a new vision of who we are and what we can do, embrace a mathematically-integrated view of the universe! Using base-2 notation and the Planck base units, that model has just 202 notations.” It teaches so much so fast. https://81018.com
24 May 2025, YouTube: We are not limited to one theory. The Big Bang theory starts with a singularity of everything-everywhere (Hawking). Instead, if we were to hypothesize a most-simple start with a most-simple three-dimensional object, the sphere, and we were to define that sphere by the Planck natural units, the results would be 18.5 tredecillion infinitesimal spheres per second (manifesting within Notation-143). See https://81018.com/tredecillion/ If we continue to follow those notations, within Notation-169 is a year. Within Notation-179 is 1000 years, in Notation-189, a million years, and within Notation-199, one billion years. The James Webb Space Telescope is just looking behind Notation-197 and its 343.15 million years. Also, if within Notation-1, where it is most simple, we recognize the four irrational numbers and their influences. We observe an intrinsic octahedral geometry and hypothesize that it supports the four. We have all those rich qualities to analyze and speculate about the logic of the first notations. A first draft of the numbers: https://81018.com/chart/ Now we all can begin speculating about the infinite diversity of our universe within its isotropy and homogeneity. https://81018.com/
_____
Critique ____ You are always invited.
_____
• This page became a homepage on 10 June 2025 (10:23 PM)
• The last update was 12 June 2025 (7:16 AM EST).
• This page was initiated on 5 June2025.
• The URL is https://81018.com/campaign2/
• Headline: Answers to five key questions change the paradigm
• First teaser* is: In search of new paradigms
*Or, wicket, kicker or eyebrow.