Upon following the work of Phiala Shanahan

TO: Prof. Dr. Phiala Shanahan,  Center for Theoretical Physics, MIT Laboratory for Nuclear Science, NSF AI – Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Fundamental Interactions (IAIFI), Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
FM: Bruce E. Camber
RE: Your work within ArXiv (50), your homepage, Wikipedia, and YouTube

First email: 6 June 2025 (updated)

Dear Prof. Dr. Phiala Shanahan:

I have made reference to your work (with Detmold and others) in several documents online:

The current homepage reviews our orientation. Bottomline, AI (particularly, your work cited) is shedding light on those 202 base-2 notations from the Planck scale to the age of the universe today. Quantum indeterminacy has a possible range of notations, yet those notations prior to Notation-50 introduce and old idea as something new. Too fast and too dense, there is no time or space for imperfections. That range possibly opens up as early as Notation-50, but more definitely opens up with symmetry-breaking around Notation-60 (and particle and waves, hadrons and gluons, around Notation-64).

We also are working with new insights within the four primary irrational numbers, π.e.√2.φ. We have been talking about the basic qualities of π since 2011 and qualities of the octahedron since 1999, but it was only as a result of early March discussions with Grok that the other three irrational numbers came up.

With pi, we had associated continuity-symmetry-harmony with circles, spheres, and sphere-stacking, but never did we have more than a passing thought about Euler’s number, the square root of 2, and phi. And though very familiar with the four hexagonal plates intrinsic to every octahedron, never did we associate those dynamic, never-ending numbers with a geometry. We did on 4 March 2025! Something changed. All four could readily be seen as inherent stabilizers at the Planck scale. We could see all those quantitative numbers as Janus features of the infinite and qualitative.

I know. It’s a stretch. But it is obvious from your ArXiv articles that you have such capabilities. You have an impressive history. Nevertheless, our orientation amounts to a major dislocation. It won’t be easy.

May we continue to write to you or are you sure that these concepts will never be mainstream?

Thank you.

Most sincerely,

Bruce

###