TO: Prof. Dr. Ritika Nagpal, Department of Mathematics, Netaji Subhas Institute of Technology, University of Delhi, New Delhi-110 078, India
FM: Bruce E. Camber
RE: Your work within ArXiv: Cosmological aspects of a hyperbolic solution in f(R,T) gravity, plus Google Scholar 1 and 2, and Researchgate.
References within this website: https://81018.com/hyper-rational/#Emails
This page URL: https://81018.com/2019/04/18/nagpal/
Second email: 3 June 2025 (Updated)
RE: Just two questions…
Dear Prof. Dr. Ritika Nagpal:
I have asked, “Who will lead us?” beyond all the dark clouds that are hiding deeper truths? Are we starting from the most basic assumptions? How do our most basic equations help to shape our narrative?”
Since 2011, I have written to a few of our world’s premier thinkers to ask, “What do the Planck base units describe?”
We have assumed a sphere simply because its the most-simple thing we know, with the broadest applications, and arguably the oldest history. We slowly learned about sphere-stacking and then assumed one infinitesimal sphere per unit of Planck Time. Rather recently, we calculated 18.5 tredecillion spheres per second. To group those spheres, we used base-2 notation and that brought us up to Notation 143. Of course, we continued to a year in Notation-169, 1000 years in Notation-179, one million years in Notations-189 and a billion years in Notation-199.
It makes a most fascinating chart.
In your article referenced above, your group relied on the FLRW space-time and model of the universe in light of the Jerk parameter, Om diagnostic, Velocity of sound and Statefinder diagnostic tools, and the datasets of SNeIa, H(z) (Hubble parameter), BAO (Baryon Acoustic Oscillation data) and combinations of the three.
(2) Do you think it might be possible to explore those datasets using AI to see if there is any correspondence with the base-2 data? Thank you.
Most sincerely,
Bruce
PS. When I discover a person’s work that fascinates me, I start a page of notes within our website that’s marked, Private. By the second email, it most-often will come out behind the firewall so I can have more active access to it. My page about your work is here: https://81018.com/2019/04/18/nagpal/ You have been included in my first “Who will lead us?” campaign which will be seen by students, docs, post docs and professors around the world. Each of the six people selected represent a distinctive search into the fundamentals. -BEC
First email: Apr 16, 2019, 11:01 AM
Dear Prof. Dr. Ritika Nagpal:
I have been attempting to grasp the essence of your writing (referenced above).
My work has been done mostly on the high school level, so you can well understand that I am at a loss. Notwithstanding, I am trying hard to interpret work we did as a class when we went further and further inside the tetrahedron and octahedron until in 45 steps we were within the domain of particle physics and in another 67 steps we were within the Planck scale. Of course, we then got our physics teacher involved and that opened a new universe for us.
When we took our desk top objects — https://81018.com/tot/ — and multiplied by 2, we were very surprised to find ourselves we were out to the age and size of the universe in just 90 steps.
Base-2 notation using just the checkerboard goes out to the 64th power. Here we are going to the 202nd power to encapsulate the universe. But, nobody seems to make any sense of it. Can you help us?
What logic functions are we failing to understand? If the universe is encapsulated ideally or mathematically within 202 notations, and these notations follow the Planck base units, and that scale seems to work, isn’t it a simple outline within which to begin to understand our universe in new ways?
Thank you for any help you can give us.
Our current homepage explains more: https://81018.com/
Our chart is here: https://81018.com/chart/
Most sincerely,
Bruce