Collins, Francis

Francis Sellers Collins

National Institutes for Health
Washington, DC

Awards: Presidential Medal of Freedom, National Medal of Science, and the Pontifical Academy of Sciences
Books: The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief.
CV (41 pages, last update 2013)
Twitter
Wikipedia
YouTube

Note: Many articles make references to Collins. For my own edification, I specially note the work of Don Page (Alberta), Does God So Love the Multiverse? (2008) (PDF)

2020 recent email: August 20, 2020, 4:47 PM

RE: Congratulations indeed! The Language of God has 2020 vision.

Dear Dr. Francis Collins:

Congratulations on winning the Templeton Award! Outstanding. Legendary!

It has been over seven years since we’ve communicated, yet I now have several references to you within my evolving website:
1. https://81018.com/templeton/
2. https://81018.com/just-a-second/#Afterthoughts
3. https://81018.com/2008/01/02/totline/

I’ll be updating these pages and I will be developing a primary page of references. Best wishes with your work to grasp and control all the parasites and viruses and other pathogens of this world!

Best wishes,
Bruce

2014 Email: 7 February 2014, 4:04 PM

Dear Dr. Francis Collins:

As a sequel to the Big Board-little universe, you might find this of
some interest: https://81018.com/2014/05/21/propaedeutics/

Your most critical comments would be profoundly appreciated.

-Bruce

2013 Email: Thursday, April 25, 2013 6:31 PM

Dear Dr. Francis Collins:

Thank you for your work to bring new light to old belief systems. Your book, The Language of God, is on my bookshelf. That you are a profound Christian thinker is obvious. That you have been profoundly criticized by the best of the atheists is also quite obvious.

Most atheists do not have answers to some rather simple questions about life.

In December 2011 I was helping a high school teacher, part of our extended family, to engage his students in base-2 exponential notation applied to the smallest and largest known measurements within our physical world. We started with the Planck :Length and went out to the Observable Universe. Both measurements are well-known but base-2 notation had not been applied to that range. We discovered 202.34 notations (doublings, layers or steps) by simply multiplying the Planck Length by 2 and then multiplying each result by 2 until we reached the largest measurement.

It is a different kind of ordering system than base-10 because its granularity has a parallel construct to many processes in chemistry and biology.

Is it useful? Should it be encouraged? If you would like to take a look at some of the discussions around it, some of our work is posted here: https://81018.com/concepts-parameters/

Thanks.

Warmly,

Bruce


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.