TO: John Carson Lennox,
Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, The Oxford Centre for Christian Apologetic (The OCCA), 27 Beaumont Street, Oxford, Oxfordshire OX1 2NR United Kingdom
FM: Bruce E. Camber
RE: Your work in Facebook, The Trinity Forum, RZIM and others; your books, particularly The Theory of Infinite Soluble Groups, Questioning our Knowledge: Can we Know What we Need to Know? (The Quest for Reality and Significance) and literally hundreds more; your homepage(s): your academic: Green Templeton College, Oxford homepages; your debates, your X-tweetts, your Wikipedia and YouTube (especially Can Science Explain Everything? (at the CS Lewis Institute) pages
This page: https://81018.com/lennox/
Email: 16 March 2025
Dear Prof. Dr. John Lennox:
Irrationals. Incommensurables. Pi (π) gets recognition and analysis. Phi (φ) get less. The square root of 2 (√2) gets engaged by a specialists. And, Euler’s number (e) is understood by fewer specialists. The irrationals may well be incommensurable, but if taken together these four just might embody an intrinsic geometry, the four hexagonal plates of the octahedron. If they do, it all happens at the Planck scale. Speculative? Of course, but I think it is worth some consideration. I turned to Grok: https://81018.com/irrationals/
To date, I have discussed it in these last four homepages:
• Pi Day 2025: https://81018.com/pi-day-2025/
• Today’s homepage: https://81018.com/incommensurable/
• Breakthrough: https://81018.com/breakthrough/ https://81018.com/breakthrough-indeed/
Your comments would be most welcomed. Thank you.
Most sincerely,
Bruce
PS. If you have any updates-changes-deletions within our page about your work, just say the word. That page is: https://81018.com/lennox/
An evolving page: https://81018.com/oxford/ -BEC
Email: 26 December 2024
Dear Prof. Dr. John Lennox:
Perhaps mathematicians are afraid to celebrate the deeper meaning of mathematics within:
- Are the endless digits of pi a pivotal connection between the finite and infinite? Is the concept of continuity absolute?
- Are the exacting symmetries of the sphere a statement about perfections in the physical world? Do those symmetries define real relations?
- Did the Fourier transform open the perfections of harmony and the dynamics of numbers? Is there a perfection within space-time, mass-energy, electromagnetism-gravity?
- Did Aristotle not see the gap with five tetrahedrons? Has there been a lack of mathematical interest in the 7.35610+ degree gap? Might it be associated with quantum fluctuations?
- Is continuity-symmetry-harmony a definition of the finite-infinite relation and the foundation of value?
Thank you.
Most sincerely,
Bruce
Email: 4 September 2024
My page about your work is here: https://81018.com/lennox/ plus there are copies of seven emails and tweets. Have you considered paradigm shifts as a means of analysing the universal? If not, consider today’s homepage: https://81018.com The permanent URL for that page is https://81018.com/correct/ Thank You! Warmly, Bruce https://81018.com/bec/
Email: 15 August 2024
RE: Is it possible to use mathematical reasoning to define the first moment of the universe? It seems reasonable…
Dear Prof. Dr. John Lennox:
The question is genuine. You, being the professional, should be able to encourage its unfolding, slow it down, or put a stop to it all. I am too deep in the weeds and may be missing the obvious.
https://81018.com/ is the site.
https://81018.com/identity/ is the link when not the homepage.
Thank you for all you do to shine light on C.S. Lewis!
Grace and peace,
Bruce
Email: 25 July 2024
Dear Prof. Dr. John Lennox:
In light of the results from the space telescopes over the years, particularly the James Webb Space Telescope, it is obvious that there are alternatives to big bang cosmology. I think we should look at base-2 notation of Planck’s natural units. In 202 simple mathematical notations, the entire universe is encapsulated: https://81018.com/
The chart of numbers: https://81018.com/chart/
A comparison with big bang: https://81018.com/calculations/
This work has a humble history: https://81018.com/home/
Thank you for your time.
Most sincerely,
Bruce
Note through your website, 11 April 2024
I sent my first email to you back in 2013: https://81018.com/lennox/#First
And, I send new greeting on this day struggling with the mathematics of the universe
starting with pi’s endless numbers, symmetries, and harmonies: https://81018.com/csh/
then looking at what Planck’s infinitesimal base units can teach us. Interesting? -Bruce
Tweet: 19 January 2022 @ 9;30 PM
@ProfJohnLennox You’re right; the CS Lewis story is poignant. We all need to focus on the next step– break out of divisive worldviews and begin adopting a highly-integrated, mathematical view of the universe. Our start: https://81018.com
Twitter-Tweet, May 1, 2020 @ 9:44 AM
@ProfJohnLennox Good luck with (the writing of your book, ”2084”). Given your talents and openness, I will be checking to see if these five statements could be true: Five Steps That Jump-Start This Universe Perhaps you might comment.
Tweet and submission within online form: 8/9 December 2019
TO: @ProfJohnLennox and @RubinReport and @jordanbpeterson
Your Metaxas appearances are quite heart-warming. Your love abides. Another view of the universe is to begin at the Planck scale and apply base 2 to outline the first 64 doublings before the particles-waves – https://81018.com/chart/ and https://81018.com/ (for the history and ongoing work). Hopefully it brings us closer to the finite-infinite transform. It includes everything, everywhere for all time and it is the simplest mathematics for a highly-integrated, mathematical view of the universe. Our reference page to you goes back to my first letter in 2013: https://81018.com/lennox/
First email: Tuesday, Dec 31, 2013, 4:49 PM (slightly updated)
Dear Prof. Dr. John Lennox:
Thank you! You are a splendid soul, the salt of the earth, and a light to the nations. Only in the past month have I gotten to know you and your work.
My brother-in-law, a theologian of wayward Baptist-flavorings, keeps sending me links to what he considers to be your best videos.
If you would like to be a bit more compelling for those know-it-alls among the Oxford clan (one was sitting behind you looking quite sure of himself with his Dawkins assurances — looking much like my nephew who is a Dawkins-groupie and an engineering student at Oxford), you might tell them something they have not heard in the past.
Here are just two examples:
1. Did you know there are just 202 base-2 exponential notations from the Planck Length to the Observable Universe, from the smallest and largest measurements of a possible length? Implication: The universe is mathematically tighter, smaller and more intimate than we think.
The doubling function is inherent within this universe. It seems that one could make the case that we’re living in an exponential universe.
2. Did you know there are over one quintillion vertices at the 60th doubling? If each step aggregates all the prior steps, at the 60th doubling there are many quintillions. That’s a lot of vertices for a richly textured structure that nobody quite recognizes. Your friend, Roger Penrose, calls it Conformal Cyclic Cosmology. He’s on the wrong side of the spectrum; it is really ontology.
Implication: The universe, albeit quite magnificently simple, is far more complicated than we think.
Of course, I could go on, but in this opening before the new year and re-awakening within Epiphany, let me send you these greeting.
Warmly,
###