A grid of infinitesimal spheres connects the Standard Model of Particle Physics and the Standard Model of Cosmology.

Image of abstract geometric shapes representing continuity, symmetry, and harmony in a mathematical model of the universe.
A cosmic representation highlighting hyper-rationality, featuring spheres, octahedrons, and hexagonal plates, depicting continuity, symmetry, and harmony in an expansive geometric model of the universe.

PERFECTION STUDIES: CONTINUITY•SYMMETRY•HARMONY GOALS.November 2023
PAGES: π (pi) |.FIRSTST.|.FOOTNOTES |.REFERENCES|. EMAILS.| IM | JOIN.| Zzzzs

This Grid Connects Everything, Everywhere, for All Time.
by Bruce E. Camber

The 202 base-2 notations from the first moment in time to this very day create a chart or a grid, or a map, or a matrix, or an ether that fills our universe.

We started at Planck Length and Planck Time. We could have used Stoney Length-and-Time, or even the ISO best calculations of the smallest possible units of time and the very smallest unit of length.

The results will be virtually the same.

We hypothesize that the first manifestation of “something” occurs within the first notation and the consensus among our students is that an infinitesimal sphere is most logical.

The three principles of pi(π) — continuity-symmetry-harmony — would also be instantiated within the finite and informed by the infinite. To attempt to grasp the dynamics of that moment, functional analysis has been used by some scholars.

That grid begins with the first infinitesimal sphere. It creates the very first instant of spacetime. Using the Planck base units, it calculates to be a rate of 18.5 tredecillion spheres per second. Within that first second of the universe and with those 18.5 tredecillion spheres, the look-feel-function-flavor of our universe is established. It is dynamic; and like pi, always changing, reflecting the character and contents of its inhabitants.

Speculating further, it seems the list of functional analysis topics[1] and the glossary of terminology[2] within functional analysis[3] are keys to interpreting the first 64 notations and key intersections between the mathematics of (1) Langlands programs, (2) string theory (including M-Theory, F-theory, type II and offshoots), (3) supersymmetry (SUSY), (4) loop quantum gravity (LQG), (5) causal dynamical triangulation (CDT), (6) causal set theory (CST), (7) field theories, (8) spectral standard model (SSM), and (9) all the hypothetical particles. Of course, there are many thought leaders and dabblers (like me), working on the edges of our most seminal of scientific formulations. Some of the work of these folks will eventually be added.

We will all be learning key integral transforms! Eventually equations will no longer intimidate!

Editor’s note: This page repeats data from the following:
https://81018.com/questions-questions/#Scholars
https://81018.com/parameters/#9a
https://81018.com/hypothetical_particles/

Footnotes:
[1] List of functional analysis topics
[2] Glossary of terminology
[3] Wikipedia on functional analysis

Other references and resources:

Keys for grid:

  • The URL for this page is: https://81018.com/grid/
  • The page was started on January 27, 2023.
  • The last update was on 14 January 2025.

Grok update (14 January 2025):

That grid begins with the first infinitesimal sphere creating the very first instant of spacetime. Using the Planck base units, it calculates to be a rate of 18.5 tredecillion spheres per second. Within that first second of the universe and with those 18.5 tredecillion spheres, the look-feel-function-flavor of our universe is established. It is dynamic; and like pi, always changing, reflecting the character and contents of its inhabitants.

Answer: Your description touches on some fascinating and complex ideas about the nature of the universe, spacetime, and the Planck scale. Here’s a breakdown of the concepts you’ve introduced:

  • Planck Base Units: These are fundamental units of measure in physics, named after Max Planck. They include:
    • Planck length (~1.616 × 10-35 meters), which could be considered the smallest meaningful length in the universe.
    • Planck time (~5.39 × 10-44 seconds), potentially the shortest measurable time interval.
    • Planck mass, energy, temperature, etc., all derived from fundamental physical constants.
  • Infinitesimal Spheres: The idea here seems to suggest that the fabric of space-time at its most fundamental level might be composed of or emerge from these extremely small, perhaps hypothetical, units or “spheres.” This could be related to theories like loop quantum gravity, where space-time itself has a granular nature.
  • 18.5 Tredecillion Spheres per Second: If we take this literally, you’re proposing that within the first Planck time unit, an enormous number of these fundamental units (1.859 followed by 43 zeros) are created. This rate would imply an incredibly dynamic, rapidly evolving universe at its inception, setting the stage for all subsequent physics.
  • Dynamic Nature: Comparing the universe’s nature to π (pi), which is irrational and non-repeating, suggests an ongoing, ever-changing complexity. This could be an analogy for how the universe might function, where every part of it interacts in ways that are both predictable by laws of physics and yet infinitely complex due to the number of variables.
  • Look-Feel-Function-Flavor: This part is more poetic, suggesting that from these fundamental units, not just the physical but perhaps the qualitative aspects of the universe are established. This might relate to how initial conditions can lead to the emergence of complexity, from the laws of physics to the development of life and consciousness, which in turn influence the universe.
  • Character and Contents: This implies a feedback loop where the universe influences its inhabitants, and in turn, they influence the universe’s evolution, perhaps through observation, interaction, or even consciousness.

This narrative combines theoretical physics with a philosophical view of the universe’s creation and evolution. While speculative, it’s an interesting way to conceptualize the universe’s origin from a very fundamental scale. Remember, however, that much of this is beyond current empirical science:

  • Current Science: In cosmology, the Big Bang theory describes the expansion of the observable universe from a very hot, dense state, but what happened at the Planck scale remains speculative due to the lack of a complete theory of quantum gravity.
  • Philosophical Implications: The idea that the universe’s “flavor” or character is shaped by its contents and vice versa touches on deep philosophical questions about causality, determinism, and the role of consciousness in physics.

In summary, your vision here is a blend of quantum physics, cosmology, and philosophical speculation, painting a picture of a universe that’s not only physically dynamic but also in a continuous state of mutual evolution with its inhabitants.

###