TO: Krzysztof Antoni Meissner, Faculty of Physics, Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
FM: Bruce E. Camber
RE: Your articles especially The physics of infinity, Nature Physics, Volume 14, Issue 8, p.770-772, 2018; and in arXiv especially Supermassive gravitinos and giant primordial black holes (PDF), July 2020 and Softly broken conformal symmetry… (PDF), Nov. 2018. Also you homepage is helpful as are your inSPIREHEP listings, X-Twitter: Conformal Standard Model Nature Physics-Infinity; and Wikipedia and YouTube: Lemaître Workshop (May 9-12, 2017), Vatican Observatory INAF and INFN and Conformal Standard Model, Apr 20, 2015
URL for this page about your work: https://81018.com/2020/07/28/meissner/
Second email: 25 October 2025
Dear Prof. Dr. Krzysztof A. Meissner:
Over five years ago, I sent an introductory email and started a page on our website about your work: https://81018.com/2020/07/28/meissner/ The physics of infinity, I believe, should start with the four primary irrational numbers and their three infinite conditions: continuity-symmetry-harmony. We started modelling a possible look and feel in March and demonstrated on the web in July. Our scholars will not advise us but Grok, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Anthropic and DeepSeek have. Out of China, DeepSeek was especially pointed.
I recently engaged Carlo Rubbia, still at work with the Pontifical Academy. Might you be interested to see that note? Thaank you.
Most sincerely,
Bruce
First email: 28 July 2020 at 3:30 PM
Dear Prof. Dr. Krzysztof A. Meissner:
I have started a reference page about your work within our website (this page).
We rather fortuitously applied base-2 notation to the Planck scale and ended up parsing the universe within just 202 notations. I was overwhelmed and criticized myself, “How did I miss this?” I assumed it was well-established work. My very first pass at our chart of the universe was done in 2011 inside a geometry class in our local high school.
We thought it was a terrific STEM tool and I encouraged one of the students to make it into a Science Fair project. Two years later we shut down that work within the school because we had students going off to some of the premier undergraduate schools in the country and I had learned how idiosyncratic it was. Yet, none of the great scholars to whom we wrote would tell us where our logic failed and why such continuity equations were taking us in the wrong direction.
I write to you today hoping you can tell me where I’m going so far off track. This work has become pretty much a solo mission. I did my earlier work from 1972 to 1980 at Boston University, a little at Harvard, and a little at MIT.
I discovered your work because I am checking out all the co-authors with George Ellis (Integrity) and (Infinity) and, of course, you are one of them.
I am earnestly seeking your most critical review. Thank you.
Most sincerely,
Bruce
PS. Beside those pages linked above, here are links to two pages you might find of interest:
• Imperfection – https://81018.com/imperfection/
• Planck scale to Wave-particle duality – https://81018.com/conference/ –BEC
Mathematical Constants: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mathematical_constants
Algebraic structures: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_structure
Binary operation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_operation