Simon D.M. White
Max-Planck-Institut fur Astrophysik
Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 1, Postfach 15 23
85748 Garching, Germany
The International Max Planck Research School on Astrophysics at the Ludwig Maximilians University Munich
Most recent email: Sunday, 7 November 2021
Dear Prof. Dr. Simon White:
Given your work with Durham and your cold dark matter model, I thought you might be interested to see my notes about the June 2021 IPPP conference, Planck Scale to Electroweak Scale: https://81018.com/smallest-largest/
I am giving you some credit within the email section of that page.
You may have seen our rather idiosyncratic, horizontally-scrolled base-2 chart from the Planck Scale to the current age and size of the universe all within just 202 notations. It is a very different cold-dark matter model. I guess nobody can believe that the universe is exponentially expanding. It’s a stretch, I know: https://81018.com/chart/ It is primarily 1000+ numbers and a little commentary. Because Planck Temperature was a special challenge, I awkwardly put it within the Notation-203 and divided by 2. By Notation-1 we were as close to Absolute Zero as anybody has ever proposed. That seemed logical but I had no clear logic for putting the Planck Temperature in the Notation-203 (yet I’ve been working on it). More recently, the inverse square law and laser thermodynamics demanded my attention so I am now exploring a more classic model whereby Notation-0 is the Planck Temperature, yet by Notation-1 is it cut in half, and by Notation-2 in half again. Of course, it falls below three Kelvin much too quickly, so I’m right now juggling with ideas around that.
I hope you are well and doing fine and that your work has been inspired!
PS. I have a resource page about your work as well: https://81018.com/2020/07/07/white_s/
First email: Tuesday, 7 July 2020
Dear Prof. Dr. Simon White:
With some reluctance I write hoping that you might have a quick suggestion that could knock me off my spurious, idiosyncratic track that I’ve been on much too long.
We share a common interest in structure formation and dark matter. You, however, have hundreds of highly-cited, peer-reviewed papers and a most impressive career.
So to the point: Why doesn’t it all begin with the four Planck base units, yes with Planck Length/Planck Time and Planck Mass/Planck Charge? If so, could the first expression of physicality be the sphere? If so, could a primary functionality be sphere stacking? And, if so, could cubic-close packing of equal spheres very nicely extend that functionality?
There are 202 base-2 notations from the first instant to the current expansion with no less than 64 notations totally in the dark (too small to measure, so much smaller than the wave-particle duality).
Please, where are we going wrong? Thanks.
Philipp Busch email@example.com
Simon D. M. White firstname.lastname@example.org