TO: Simon D.M. White, Max-Planck-Institut fur Astrophysik, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 1, , 85748 Garching, Germany and The International Max Planck Research School on Astrophysics at the Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany

Articles (Publications)
ArXiv: Reconstructing the Universe in a computer… (PDF), June 2018
Homepage(s) (MPI): CV (PDF), Google Scholar, inSPIRE^HEP, Wikipedia, YouTube

Most recent email: Sunday, 7 November 2021 (updated, 8 July 2024)

Dear Prof. Dr. Simon White:

Given your work with Durham and your cold dark matter model, I thought you might be interested to see my notes about the June 2021 IPPP conference, Planck Scale to Electroweak Scale: https://81018.com/smallest-largest/

I am giving you some credit within the email section of that page.

You may have seen our rather idiosyncratic, horizontally-scrolled base-2 chart from the Planck Scale to the current age and size of the universe all within just 202 notations. It is a very different cold-dark matter model. I guess nobody can believe that the universe is exponentially expanding. It’s a stretch, I know: https://81018.com/chart/ It is primarily 1000+ numbers and a little commentary. Because Planck Temperature was a special challenge, I awkwardly put it within the Notation-203 and divided by 2. By Notation-1 we were as close to Absolute Zero as anybody has ever proposed. That seemed logical but I had no clear logic for putting the Planck Temperature in Notation-203. Though thinking a little about it, more recently the inverse square law and laser thermodynamics demanded my attention so I am now exploring a more classic model whereby Notation-0 is the Planck Temperature, yet by Notation-1 is the best possible temperature for exponential notation of the Planck base units. There is no time, so it can be arbitrarily determined when Notation-1 breaks into reality with those Planck natural units and begins space-time.

I hope you are well and doing fine and that your work has been inspired!

Warmly,

Bruce

PS. I have a resource page about your work as well: https://81018.com/2020/07/07/white_s/

First email:  Tuesday, 7 July 2020

Dear Prof. Dr. Simon White:

With some reluctance I write hoping that you might have a quick suggestion that could knock me off my spurious, idiosyncratic track that I’ve been on much too long.

We share a common interest in structure formation and dark matter. You, however, have hundreds of highly-cited, peer-reviewed papers and a most impressive career.

So to the point: Why doesn’t it all begin with the four Planck base units, yes with Planck Length/Planck Time and Planck Mass/Planck Charge? If so, could the first expression of physicality be the sphere? If so, could a primary functionality be sphere stacking? And, if so, could cubic-close packing of equal spheres very nicely extend that functionality?

There are 202 base-2 notations from the first instant to the current expansion with no less than 64 notations totally in the dark (too small to measure, so much smaller than the wave-particle duality).

We’re just high school folks.

Please, where are we going wrong? Thanks.

Warmly,

Bruce

_________

 Simon White, International Max Planck Research School on Astrophysics at the Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, has been at the forefront of a Cold Dark Matter paradigm. Because scholars like him have been working with cold concepts within a classic big bang model, I have been pushed to ask silly questions like, “Could there be a super-cooling from the Planck Temperature because that phenomena would most likely act like laser thermodynamics. Could the inverse square law apply?” Based on those flights of fancy, I just started another chart that starts with the Planck Temperature within Notation-0 and is divided by 2 to arrive at a radically reduced temperature for Notation-1. It is divided by 2 again for Notation-2. Because it is temperature assumed to be light and not an “infinitely-dense” singularity, but a very dense black light that within Notation-94 becomes visible light.

If one Planck Sphere manifests per unit of Planck Time within thirty-one doublings, the size is still an infinitesimal 3.470762×10^-26 meters, and the mass just 103 pounds (46.79 Kilograms). So now we are asking, “What might the temperature be and why?” Within our first horizontally-scrolled chart, it is 4.73×10^-18K. In the chart with Planck Temperature within Notation-0, it is 6.597×10²²K. The Electroweak Scale requires an estimated temperature of 2×10¹² Kelvin to create the Quark-Gluon Plasma (QGP). That’s an important benchmark. It requires 175 MeV per particle. We’ll need help to figure out which notation would be a logical place as another mechanism to force the review of possible mathematics and functions that may be at work.

Philipp Busch pbusch@mpa-garching.mpg.de
Simon D. M. White swhite@mpa-garching.mpg.de