A few Tweets in June 2018

@SenBlumenthal Noxious on both sides. Peter Strzok undermines the rule of law. We need a better understanding of who we are and why: http://81018.com is a highly-integrated view off the universe. Everything you say and do imprints this universe. Be fair. Be honest.
Jun 17 @DrZuhdiJasser Excellent with Mark @marklevinshow. I’ve studied a little Franz Rosenthal; now Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser is added to my studies! We do not need more worldviews. We need an mathematical-integrated view of the universe —http://81018.com — to open deeper insights.
Jun 17, 2018 Replying to @gregory @leweb

You’re right. You’re right. You are right. Watch we will.
Jun 17, 2018 @gregory At 70, I’m still at it: http://81018.com There is still plenty to do to right this little spaceship of ours. Congratulations on all that you are doing. Let’s find the best businesses and prepare them to be transferable to the next generation.
Jun 13 Replying to @danfalk Are you in Chicago today, Dan? …on assignment? ….writing about?
Jun 13 Replying to @Comey Yes, in the grand scheme, this is a blip. Most importantly, we need a better understanding of the nature of things. Now that Hawking is dead, perhaps we can revisit the Big Bang and learn how intimate this universe really is and how truth will always rise.
Jun 13 Replying to @CuriosityStream @filmdailyco

The availability of all media inch from all time is overwhelming. Yet, the very best footage is your own footage. Your life is the drama; fill it with positives and effect the universe positively: http://81018.com Every thought word and deed impacts all of us.
Jun 8 Replying to @cbcradio @AuthorDanBrown

Sorry Dan, there is no division between the universal, aka the infinite and the finite and between God and humanity. Newton’s absolute time and Hawking’s bang are off and you’ve swallowed that silliness: http://81018.com opens that debate.
Jun 4 @skakos Thank you, Spiros, for all your thoughtful work. I found you through your Planck quote which I used here: https://81018.com/2014/12/01/door/ … I’ll try learning more from your blogspot. Thanks. – @BruceCamber
May 30 Replying to @ehendricksnorth You are 100% right, Elizabeth. Question the obvious because our commonsense worldviews are inherited from our parents and their parents and so much of it was what was understood in that time. Question the old guard like Hawking and Sir Isaac:
May 30 Replying to @CuriosityStream @JohnSHendricks

Be careful. It seems that Hawking, like Sir Isaac Newton who he followed (Lucasian professors #2 and #17), are both off about key concepts — absolute space and time and the big bang theory. We’re enjoying Gateway Canyons. Came in yesterday.
May 30 Replying to @nancymbirdsall @nytimes

Multicultural requires multi-religious which will require a new cosmology-to-ontology and epistemology. Without Hawking let us entertain new ideas. Here’s one that came out of a high school geometry class and is 100% predictive and its logic coheres:
May 30 Replying to @orzelc

Chad – you may find this work of some interest: https://81018.com/big-bang-theory/ … An open letter about it all is here: https://81018.com/imagination/ I would enjoy your comments and counsel. -Bruce
May 30 Replying to @mmlagoscc @VergaraLautaro We have soaked up Newton’s absolute space and time and Hawking’s Big Bang. Both are wrong. Leibniz was right. Space/time is relational. Max Planck had it right: https://81018.com/c/ Discover an exponential universe: https://81018.com/chart/ https://81018.com/big-bang-theory/ …
May 30 Replying to @mmlagoscc @VergaraLautaro “Very serious that a person who is in prison for crimes of human rights can publish a book. It is as if they had let a condemned man from the Nuremberg Trials have published books when they were in prison. This country is sick.” All countries are sick and most people, too.
May 29 Replying to @phylogenomics @ABC @Disney Gotcha games are ultimately boring. Let’s get our cosmology and ontology straighten out and maybe our epistemology will follow:
May 29 Replying to @AnnCoulter @mckaycoppins Liberals and conservatives should get together on these numbers— an integrated, mathematical and exponential universe in just 202 doublings from the Planck base units to the current Age of the Universe. It’s simple and it just might help build bridges:
May 29 Replying to @CuriosityStream @JohnSHendricks Hawking was tenacious, sets a new standard and resolute but the Big Bang was his undoing. Neil Turok, co-author and collaborator, said he was wrong: https://81018.com/bbtheory What we need is an integrative theory that is mathematical, simple, predictive and closer to the truth.
May 29 Replying to @rincon_p @pauljfranklin Our biggest block, an impasse, is the Big Bang theory. Although soundly criticized by many, it prevails because of a lack of a viable alternative. Here’s one that came out of a high school geometry class: http://81018.com/home And with the numbers:
May 26 Replying to @RogerHighfield @philipcball @joestilgoe Roger, you, too, might want to look in on a harmony more basic than quantum geometries and chaos theory to have a sense of a deeper ordering of the universe. http://81018.com opens that discussion; https://81018.com/harmony/ is a sequel.
May 26 Replying to @philipcball @sciencemuseum @joestilgoe Think Kepler, think of harmony being more deeply seated than chaos, think of spheres in an endless dance, think about the discordant as the geometries of the pentastar, icosahedron and pentakis dodecahedron: http://81018.com/harmony “might” help. Good luck with your project!
May 17 Replying to @Enrique_Acevedo @FoxNews @TuckerCarlson

Congratulations. Of course, you know that we are all animals. @NancyPelosi is right that we have a divine spark within us, yet we are also part of the animal kingdom. Understanding the divine spark is important: http://81018.com for more!
May 16 Replying to @NobelPrize @FrankWilczek Yes, simplicity and beauty will over shadow the chaos of the infinitely-dense, infinitely-small Big Bang theory whereby an orderly doubling of the Planck units will supersede the nonsense that we have today. http://81018.com opens the discussion.
May 15 Replying to @MazzucatoM The economics of abundance requires an epistemology, cosmology, and ontology of abundance and that will only happen when we discover that the universe is actually exponential. Euler’s identity! http://81018.com is my take on it to date.
May 15 Replying to @nomiprins Possibly neither. The exponential nature of debt just might be met with the exponential growth of knowledge, insight and wisdom; obviously wisdom is the key. The universe is exponential: http://81018.com and we’ve got to grasp that first!
May 8 @Roger_Scruton Re-read your WSJ article, “Memo to Hawking: There’s Still Room for God.” Just think he’s now getting a re-orientation with Newton’s help, to get over absolute time and begin to see the universe as it is: http://81018.com and finite-infinite transformations.
May 8 @phalpern Still at it, Paul. You might enjoy this little reflection on Weisskopf: https://81018.com/weisskopf Latest idiosyncratic postulations:
May 8

Replying to @Mfsharif1 @YouTube

You might enjoy this little reflection:
May 8

@EricRWeinstein You might enjoy this little reflection: http://81018.com/weisskopf I think Peter might, too.
May 8

Replying to @GregHarradine

You might enjoy this little reflection:
May 8

“Thinking about a time with Viki”
May 8

@annhandley @MarketingProfs How do we market simplicity, real deep simplicity that raises complexity? We’re getting there: http://81018.com/growth Hawking and Newton started with the abstracted and complex and confused us all for centuries.
May 8

@bethdunn Any possibility to get some feedback on this shape of the finite-infinite relation? https://81018.com/growth Thanks. Beth…
May 8

Replying to @scottagunn @fwd_mvt

How about this page for the finite-infinite connection: https://81018,com/growth

BTW, your heart is right. Found you through “Cowley” of SSJE, in Cambridge, MA
May 8

@SSJE Are the “Cowley” pubs all online now? Looking….
May 5

Less than a 15 second read… You are also the face of new possibilities. These eight folks (pictured), no matter how famous, are all just like you. Yes, let me hear from you!
May 5

Less than a 15 second read… You are also the face of new possibilities. These eight folks (pictured), no matter how famous, are all just like you. Yes, let me hear from you.
May 5

@robcontactout How about breaking through all the nonsense and little worldviews to begin to adopt a mathematically-integrated view of the universe: http://81018.com/chart for the numbers and http://81018.com/home for the story. Let’s talk! See the

May 3

Replying to @philosophybites @AmandaGefter

Thanks, Amanda, I would have missed it.
May 3

@BretWeinstein OK, you’re right. First you’ll need an integrated universe view: http://81018.com/chart Just mathematics, but it is a continuity equation like no other. Visit the home page please and let me know what you think!
Apr 26

@katyperry Here you are listed among world leaders, Nobel laureates, and other key thought leaders: http://81018.com/alphabetical It is all about breaking out of little worldviews and adopting an integrated universe view in part defined by light! Light and love!
Apr 26

@LaloDagach Are you able to engage new ideas and insights? Have you ever heard of an integrated view of the universe by starting at the smallest scale and going to the largest? Planck Time to today? Liberating: http://81018.com Try it. It might raise a question or two.
Apr 25

@BharatKaravadra Spectacular header image! Nuut, Greenland? Vancouver? Let’s see our universe as a whole! http://81018.com Best wishes, Bruce
Apr 25

@DacrePaul Great life, Paul. Brilliantly jostled (Wiki read). You came in 1948 and I in 1947. At this time in our progression, let’s break out of tight worldviews. Adopt an integrated view of the universe. Not impossible: http://81018.com 202 base-2 steps from the start!
Apr 24

Replying to @MarcusduSautoy @OxUniMaths

If I were in England, I’d be there! Base-2, period-doubling bifurcation, and multiscale modeling just might awaken us all to an integrated scale of the universe. http://81018.com and my open letter to you: https://81018.com/2018/04/18/sautoy/ … Congratulations. Best wishes!
Apr 21

@BharatKaravadra Congratulations on what you think, do and project. Regarding the powers of ten, you might find our powers of 2 (doublings) to be of some interest: http://81018.com/chart We started in a high school geometry class! 202 steps from Planck Time to today!
Apr 20

@AwardsDaily Tensions throughout our world, especially those out of politics or religion, come out of limited worldviews. If we open up integrated views of the universe, things will change. First, we starting with the simplest using simple math: http://81018.com/chart Comments?
Apr 18

@narendramodi You have a responsibility to open the best concepts for your students in India and the world. We need a mathematically-integrated view of the universe. The most simple uses base-2 from the Planck Scale: http://81018.com/chart There are just 202 notations!
Apr 15

Replying to @Comey

Here is a definition of ethics and values you probably have not entertained: https://81018.com/ethics/ and then http://81018.com/value
Apr 15

Replying to @nattyover

Get an integrated view of the universe using base-2 from the Planck units and dark matter-dark energy and homogeneity and isotropy have room to breathe with plenty of possibility for mathematics to engage:
Apr 10

@Humanists_UK Humanists might also work on an integrated model of the universe whereby humanism and universalism find a common ground. There are 202 doublings of the Planck base units at the start of the universe to this day:
Apr 10

Replying to @Zac_Petkanas

Your stridency on Fox News, Martha MacCullum, is unbecoming, detached, and illogical. There are many of us who were not enamored with Trump but we were less enamored with Clinton. You are loosing your credibility with us as just another bull-in-a-less than intelligent dialogue.
Apr 6

Replying to @edfrenkel @WorldSciFest and 2 others

Excellent!
Apr 6

Replying to @dreverettpiper @MedvedSHOW

What is missing in this discussion is the understanding of an integrated view of the universe – http://81018.com based on simple mathematics that encapsulates the Standard Models (with some adjustments).