TO: Peter Diamandis, 800 Corporate Pointe, Suite 350, Culver City, CA 90230
FM: Bruce E. Camber
RE: Your articles and books, especially Abundance – The Future Is Better Than You Think and BOLD – How to Go Big, Create Wealth and Impact the World. Your homepage and TED speech, Twitter tweets, Wikipedia, YouTube, and X-Prize
This page: https://81018.com/2018/04/02/diamandis/ also https://81018.com/2018/11/24/diamandis-peter/
First tweet: January 25, 2020 @ 6:52 PM
6:52 PM · Jan 25, 2020 @raykurzweil @PeterDiamandis If you look into the clear night skies and say, “It goes on forever,” Newton’s absolutes live on. If you recognize Planck’s 1899 base units, i.e. Planck Time-Length, a finite, relational universe becomes possible: http://81018.com Try it out!
Third email: 27 November 2018 On being invited to join
Your systems are all all so automated, I am rather sure you don’t know who I am. I have enough memberships. I am looking for people who are critical thinkers and who critically and creatively respond to emails about key issues.
Surround yourselves with thinkers who can take on the universe and get it under control. Worldviews are much too small.
Email: Saturday, 24 November 2018
Abundance Insider needs an integrated universe view so you can teach others to get beyond their limited worldviews!
Imputing meaning to our mundane activities is a key to our civil society.
If we keep harboring the simplistic constructions of big bang cosmology,
we’ll continue to end up with a solipsism that quickly degrades into a variety of narcissistic expressions where they harvest meaning through a nihilism that adds to all the dystopian nonsense.
If we follow the Planck base units within a mathematical construction that necessarily relates everything, everywhere for all time, perhaps we can re-open old questions such as the very nature of space and time, and finally begin to make a little progress beyond the Standard Models for particle physics and for comsology.
-Bruce
Please note: In prior discussions I have suggested to Peter:
1. There is no singularity. The very first fractional moment within space-time is defined by the Planck base units and all the dimensionless constants that define each. Please see the horizontally-scrolled chart.
2. The Universe is highly integrated within 202 base-2 exponential notations from the Planck base units to the current age of the universe. This is a model of the very early universe. The first second takes us into Notation 143 and the first 300 million years (Notation 197) brings us to large-scale structure formation.
“Membership” within his groups is always pricey. Abundance Digital is $1495 per year.
First email: 2 April 2018
Dear Peter:
I am writing about your whitepaper, Reinventing How We Teach Our Kids. Among all the efforts to improve education — Gates has his initiative; Bezos has his; and, Lucas (Edutopia) has his (the list goes on ad nauseam), there is a fundamental flaw.
Everybody is de facto using a Newtonian construct for space-and-time.
The largely unspoken belief is that there is no alternative. Since Einstein and now many streams within current scholarship tell us that this form of realism and naturalism can no longer be supported. “There is an alternative out there” and folks like Turok, Arkani-Hamed-Tegmark are calling for new ideas and insights.
We all grew up and have a commonsense view that space-time is absolute. Is it possible that space-time is derivative? How?
In 2011 in a high school geometry class in New Orleans, we backed into a possibility. Getting scholars to comment on it is not easy. Might you have any words of wisdom for us?
Most sincerely,
Bruce
*************
Bruce E. Camber
http://81018.com
Austin, Texas
Links within the email:
https://81018.com/redefinition/
http://81018.com/home/
An article many times rejected: http://81018.com/stem/