Merali, Zeeya

Zeeya Merali

Research scholar, author and journalist
London, UK

AEON: The idea of creating a new universe in the lab is no joke (June 2017)
Books: A Big Bang in a Little Room: The Quest to Create a New Universe
New Scientist: Is mathematical pattern the theory of everything? (about Garrett Lisi, 2007)
Scientific American   Science and Non-Duality  Social Trends Institute

Background: A degree in natural sciences from University of Cambridge and a PhD in cosmology from Brown University,  Dr. Merali is also a consulting editor for Foundational Questions Institute (FQI) in Decatur, Georgia.

  1. Merali’s 2013 article (August 28) in Nature, Theoretical physics: The origins of space and time
  2. Scientific American (SA), A Meta-Law to Rule Them All: Physicists Devise a “Theory of Everything”
  3. In Search of Time’s Origin (Nautilus, January 2014)

Not her bestBack From the Future, Discover Magazine, August 26, 2010  We just can’t assume the arrow of time is fundamental. It appears to be derivative of light — — as it creates space, so there are many good questions to examine all around Planck’s most basic formulas.

 Third email: March 29, 2019

You are quite a remarkable person;
and, Peter Woit was wired a bit too tightly that moment.

The finite-infinite relation has not been addressed very well: We all seem to be afraid of God talk.
I commend you for your boldness.

Regarding the IaF: Any proposals from Google Mind Team?
Could people from these two groups work together on a joint venture?


Second email, October 14, 2016

Dear Dr. Merali:

You are doing very important work. To have a working reference, I’ve started a webpage about it here:

If you’d like me to change anything, just tell us what.

I suspect there are many people working as hard as possible, night and day, to the same end goals of redefining science and religion.  I have been focused on it since 1969 (college graduation).

When I found your science and non-duality page, I thought, “More of Zeeya’s people!”

To construct the universe, what about starting at the Planck scale?  If we initially  focus just on time, length, mass and charge and use the simplest extension, base-2 notation,  the results render a rather dramatic result:’s homepage — — is a focus on Hawking. Last week it was a focus on time: Thanks.

Most sincerely,
First email: Wednesday, July 13, 2016

Thank you, Zeeya, for being such an insightful person.

I enjoy your writing.

You may be intrigued by the audacity of our group:

You’ll see a horizontally-scrolled chart of the 202 base-2 notations
from the Planck base units to the Age of the Universe.
Here continuity and symmetry are our cornerstones of logic and science.
It stands to reason that there is something between the Planck
base units and quarks, fermions and photons.

I thought you might find this of some interest.

Most sincerely,

New Orleans
Skype: Bruce.Camber

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.