Upon following the work of Vitaly Vanchurin

TO: Vitaly Vanchurin, CEO, Founder, Artificial Neural Computing Corporation, PO Box 266851, Weston, FL 33326, USA (At the intersection of physics, biology and machine learning…)
FM: Bruce E. Camber
RE: For an overview of your work (for my first email), I explored these two articles: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2632-2153/abe6d7 and
https://pirsa.org/11070023 and then I surveyed your homepage, Tufts, Google Scholar, LinkedIN, and then research.

This file is: https://81018.com/vanchurin/

Second email: 11 March 2025

Dear Dr. Vitaly Vanchurin:

Duluth is too cold. Florida is sometimes too hot, but usually, it’s pretty close to perfect. And, congratulations on starting and growing Artificial Neural Computing Corporation.

The size of your neural nets will eventually include the universe. Base-2 notation will accommodate the openness to the Now through the four hexagonal plates within the first octahedron within scale-invariant sphere at the Planck Scale and defined by the primary irrational, incommensurable numbers

Thank you.

Most sincerely,

Bruce

First email: 3 April 2023 Update: 19 March 2025

Dear Prof. Dr. Vitaly Vanchurin:

You’ve done basic research with the best. Your vitae is a who’s who among leading thinkers.

We live in precarious times and we all must become bolder. Beyond the Standard Model, particularly from the Planck scale to the electroweak scale is being studied meticulously.  All the assumptions and first principles are from the electroweak scale (and laden the decision trees). Shouldn’t we be asking questions from the Planck scale?

Questions for a paradigm shift:

  1. What if it all truly starts at the Planck scale? 
  2. What manifests first?
  3. Might infinitesimal spheres?
  4. Could Lemaitre’s “primeval atoms” be a metaphor?
  5. Is Fourier’s harmony functions scale invariant to the Planck scale?
  6. Do sphere-stacking and cubic-close packing of equal spheres apply?
  7. Does it follow from Poincaré to Smale-and-Milnor?
  8. Do those earliest geometries define perfection? …a finite-infinite relation?
  9. Do these geometries then define quantum fluctuations? 

My overview: https://81018.com/continuity-symmetry-harmony/

Your most direct criticism would be appreciated. Thank you.

Most sincerely,

Bruce