Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Fundamental Interactions (IAIFI). Their work is so important to both fields, there will be a cross section of communications with the scholars affiliated with this consortium of the best from Harvard, MIT, Northeastern, and Tufts. The institute is physically located in the Laboratory for Nuclear Science of the department of physics at MIT.
These are our other references to the work of the lab: https://81018.com/enigmatic/ and our pages about the work of Cora Dvorkin (Harvard), and Max Tegmark (MIT). This page is introduced for others in the lab beginning with its director, Jesse Thaler (MIT) and then some of its younger scholars (introductory email). There is always more to come…
Second email: 31 July 2024
Editor’s note: Scholars who make their work accessible are to be congratulated. Scholars who are themselves accessible are likewise to be further congratulated. The entire team of IAIFI is accessible. But in these days, there is a reluctance to respond. It is quite unlike my note to 102-year-old scholar, Gerald Holton, who responded quickly and graciously. -beC
Dear IAIFI affiliate: (working through the list until I get a response)
In light of your work with IAIFI, and in light of the results from the space telescopes over the years, particularly the James Webb Space Telescope, is there a way of asking AI if there are alternatives to big bang cosmology? For example, would AI interpret the logic of a base-2 notation of Planck’s natural units?
The result is 202 mathematical notations encapsulating the universe: https://81018.com/
The chart of numbers: https://81018.com/chart/
A comparison with big bang: https://81018.com/calculations/
This work has a humble history: https://81018.com/home/
Again, might AI regenerate that model once introduced to it?
Thank you for your time.
Most sincerely,
Bruce
**********************************************
Bruce E. Camber, https://81018.com/bec/
**********************************************
Jesse Thaler, Director: 20 July 2024 (updated)
Dear Prof Dr. Jesse Thaler,
Cora Dvorkin opened a path to learn about your work. AI provides the best possible survey of those scholar-scientists who are working back to Planck-scale physics. I’ll spend some time surveying your work and that of your leading thinkers.
There are many efforts that show some promise.
One of the most simple but comprehensive was unwittingly done in 2011 in high school geometry class. They were following the embedded geometries of the tetrahedron-octahedron watching how they perfectly nest by dividing the edges by 2 and connecting the new vertices. In 45 steps within they were looking at CERN labs scales, and in 67 more steps, they were at the Planck Length and Planck Time. Yes, it’s a detailed grid of 112 steps, largely unexamined below notation 64.
In 2016 we finally did a better chart: https://81018.com/chart/
This homepage has links back to IAIFI: https://81018.com/enigmatic/ (in the conclusion).
This is a special day, the beginning of our transition from worldviews to universe views whereby we consider the universe as a whole. I wish you total success in shaping AI to do a thorough analysis of these formative minutes of the universe.
Thank you.
Most sincerely,
Bruce
###