Neil deGrasse Tyson, Hayden Planetarium, American Museum for Natural History,
200 Central Park West, New York, NY 10024
Articles & Books: Letters from an Astrophysicist (2019), ISBN 978-1324003311
CV, Homepage, X, Wikipedia, YouTube (many, many) YouTube @UniversalKnowledge01
Within this website: https://81018.com/bottom-up/ Request: https://81018.com/tyson-2025/
http://81018.com/tweets-2020/#Tyson https://81018.com/consciousness/#Tyson
A Different Framework To Define the Universe Communications in January 2020
This page: http://81018.com/tyson/ A Tweets page: http://81018.com/tweets/#Tyson
Run the numbers: https://81018.com/compilation/ Mathematical Model: https://81018.com/formulas/
Map the Universe: https://81018.com/map-the-universe/ https://81018.com/2018/03/14/hawking-pi/#Tyson
Last message: 3 February 2025
Dear Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson:
We sent a “Media Request” for an interview and because there are many points of view and we know that ours requires your expertise in math and physics (besides cosmology and astronomy) and our point of view has been not quite traditional, I thought I should send a note directly to you.
Our questions are different. To get validation that our simple mathematics is correct would be a first. Just for that, we would be eternally grateful. Yet, your best guesses on all the other questions would make a world — yes, a universe — of difference. Again, the embedded link is: https://81018.com/tyson-2025/
Thank you, Dr. Neil!
Sincerely,
Bruce
Tweet: November 15, 2021
@neiltyson Nor does it change as you go smaller and smaller, right down to the Planck or Stoney units. It works within the larger scale, too. Ultimately, it reflects and encapsulates a finite-infinite relation: https://81018.com/almost
Tweet: April 15, 2021 @9:45 AM
@neiltyson We cannot shepherd the future with our current worldviews. They’re all too small. We need an integrated view of the universe. Please guide us: http://81018.com We’ve just started on a base-2 model from Planck Time to today in 202 notations.
First email: January 11, 2020 @ 5:45 PM
Dear Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson:
Should we call to question Newton’s absolute space and time? Do the Planck formulas tell us that space and time are derivative of light? We’ve been so blinded by big bang cosmology, we failed to do a simple calculation, Planck Length divided by Planck Time is equal to 299,792,422.79 m/sec. That is 1.616255(38)×10-35 meters divided by 5.391247(13)×10-44 seconds. The result is close enough, within .0001% of the laboratory vacuum definition. If we take Planck Time and Planck Length to be the first moment of physical space and time — it seems quite logical — we can apply base-2 and encapsulate the universe in 202 notations. Across that spectrum the result is always within .1% of the laboratory number. The one-second mark is between the 143rd and 144th notations.
Lucasian Professors, particularly #2 and #17, didn’t always score 100% on all their results. None of us do.
Your comments would be highly appreciated.
Thanks.
-Bruce
###