Introduction: An Open Request
Media Background: We’ve done 300+ productions of a series on PBS-TV and VOA-TV from 1994 to 2012. We have featured people achieving the American Dream. This page is a series of questions for Neil deGrasse Tyson. We have worked on our study since December 2011. Though a long time, the questions are all open and out in the public domain.
Yes, we would like to ask Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson the following questions about big bang cosmology in light of the James Webb Space Telescope.
Our Questions:
- In light of the observational of young galaxies, within 400,000 years, is it appropriate to examine the inital conditions for the big bang?
- Could there be one Plancksphere per unit of Planck Time and Planck Length?
- If there is an infinitesimal sphere at one unit per Planck Time and Planck Length, have we correctly calculated that there would be approximately 18.5 tredecillion spheres per second?
- Might it be a cosmological constant?
- At that moment is the universe perfectly isotropic and homogeneous? Is the expansion is immediate and uniform?
- Might sphere stacking-and-packing open our Euclidean universe as a universe defined by infinitesimal spheres? We are studying this page: https://81018.com/stacking/
- With so many infinitesimal spheres (Planck scale), might we apply base-2 notation or the powers of 2? Frank Wilczek suggested we could.
- What is defined within the first 64 notations? What is possible? …anything?
- We are well below possible measurements of a length and a unit of time (transaction speed), or a density (We are studying — https://81018.com/tredecillion/ — do you think scale invariance of spheres still applies?
- If so, does the continuity of pi apply? If so, do the symmetry equations apply? And if so, do Fourier’s Transform and its harmonies apply?
We have written up the page: https://81018.com/csh/ - Are our calculations at notation-143 correct? We found one second within it. Similarly, are our calculations correct with Notation-169 to discover the first year?
…and Notation-179 to contain 1000 years? …and Notation-189 for the first million years? … and Notation-199 for the first billion years? - We can imagine at some point, the densities between spheres were such that it allowed for a five tetrahedral construction, and then a five octahedral construction. And then, at some point in a-yet-to-be-determined time, these constructions become systemic; a different kind of construction, there is space to move. Do you think that this could be the beginning of quantum fluctuations? Again, we are studying our article: https://81018.com/stacking/
- Now it appears to us that all notations are active and they build upon each other. Is this a fair and logical conclusion?
- If all notations are always active, is time redefined? Is all time Now?
- If all notations,N-64 and smaller (or earlier or faster), are beyond possibility of direct physical measurement, might these notation constitute candidates for dark matter and dark energy?
We recognize that these constitute major questions. Perhaps if you do not have an answer, might you imagine that there is a living scholar somewhere in the world who might be able to answer it?
Thank you.
Most sincerely,
Bruce