ArXiv: Cutting Deep Into The Amplituhedron (Oct. 2018)
Twitter (Jarda’s not active)
YouTube: Singularity Structure of Gravity Amplitude, 2016, Nordita
Related pages on this website: https://81018.com/redefinition/
First email: 4 August 2018
Dear Prof. Dr. Jaroslav Trnka:
Many I call you about your fundamental re-thinking
of space, time, infinity, first principles… Yes, yes, it has been said,
“But don’t step on my favorite theory or the special relics of our history.”
Why not see the universe as one big Planck scale whereby various doubling functions kick in and push the base units up to the current size of the universe,
the current age of the universe, the current mass of the universe, and the current charge of the universe?
On Monday, I’ll be at SLAC; are you in the area this summer?
PS. I’ll try to fix the broken links on those two pages
referenced above. Also, with some encouragement I could
start a Wikipedia page for you based on your current pages at QMAP and Davis.
PPS. Everybody knows “…expanding exponentially in every direction,
from an infinitely small, infinitely hot, infinitely dense point,
creating a cosmos filled with energy and matter. ”
(quoting Stephen Hawking) is problematic.
The only difference between the quiet expansion and the big bang theory is the first picosecond which defines the first three epochs in the big bang theory. Yes, their Planck Epoch, Grand Unification Epoch, and Inflationary Epoch are exceedingly short. Within our base-2/Planck scale model, those processes involve as many as forty doublings before the Electroweak processes begin, and as many as another 60 to 100 additional doublings before the Quark-then-Hadron processes begin. And, within this model, we are still within the first second of the unfolding universe. That is a lot of space for pure mathematics and geometries. -BEC