TO: Adam Riess, Bloomberg Distinguished Professor, Space Telescope Science Institute, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD USA
FM: Bruce E. Camber
RE: Your work on the Hubble Tension, your Nobel prize, and so much more.
URL for this page about your work: https://81018.com/2016/07/16/riess-adam/
Second email: Monday, 6 October 2025
Dear Prof. Dr. Adam Riess:
Back in 2011 we calculated that there were 202 base-2 notations that outlined the universe. Back in 2019, using a toy model, we calculated the number of infinitesimal spheres being generated — 1.85 × 1043 spheres per second. Using the popular nomenclature, that is 18.5 tredecillion Planck Spheres/second. Last week both Grok and ChatGPT did a toy model calculations to see what such a rate would look like for the Hubble Constant. They both arrived at ≈ 71 km/s/Mpc. We are tightening up those numbers with another interesting calculation, our expansion of the never-ending, never-repeating numbers of pi (π) with the intrinsic hexagonal plates of every octahedron with the four primary irrational numbers.
Is it just coincidental or shall we ascribe meaning to it?
Thanks.
Warmest regards,
Bruce
PS. Our page about your work — https://81018.com/2016/07/16/riess-adam/ — had a visitor today!
First email: Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 3:47 PM
Dear Prof. Dr. Adam Riess:
I am glad you had discovered that the universe is still expanding; it helps our little model of the universe using base-2 exponential notation from the Planck base units to the Age of the Universe. Even though that it is actually accelerating raises questions for us, it seems to raise even more questions about the big bang inflation. Our definition of inflation is built into that base-2 notation. It seems no one can tell us why it’s wrong; they can only tell us that it’s idiosyncratic. And, we’ll be the first to admit, it is!
I was talking with an information guru and friend, and he said, “Discovery is better than belief.” I agreed. We had been talking about the base-2 model and numbers and my references to Guth, Lightman, Wilczek and Langlands. He was sure that there would be some openness to look more closely at the implications of base-2 for the big bang.
I was not so sure. The big bang theory has been king of the road for forty years!
Dark energy and dark matter, now that’s another story.
I seriously believe the Langlands programs will be of some help in the near future.
Here is my latest post about the work.
Of course, your comments and suggestions are always welcomed.
Thanks.
Most sincerely,
Bruce
****************
Bruce Camber
https://81018.com
Links above:
https://81018.com/chart/
https://81018.com/2016/06/01/quiet/
https://81018.com/alphabetical/
A Quiet Expansion of the Universe – Worldviews limit perspective↗
Discovery is better than belief. Saul Perlmutter, Adam Riess and Brian Schmidt all shared the 2011 Nobel Prize in physics for their 1998 work to explain acceleration, i.e. the expansion of our Universe is accelerating.
###