TO: Subir Sarkar, Emeritus Professor at the Rudolf Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics, University of Oxford
FM: Bruce Camber
RE: Your ArXiv reports (134), especially Colloquium: The Cosmic Dipole Anomaly, ArXiv (PDF)(September 2025), The Dark Matter Crisis, 2022 and Ruling out light axions: the writing is on the wall (2022), even your homepage(s) especially Google Scholar, Gruber Fdtn., InspireHEP, LinkedIN, New Scientist, and Oxford give perspective.
The URL for this page is: https://81018.com/sarkar/
Third email: 10 September 2025
Dear Prof. Dr. Subir Sarkar,
FYI: If you replied to my prior email, so sorry to report that we have no record of it.
I have updated our page about your work: https://81018.com/sarkar/
I think our questions come down to two: “Which is more fundamental: the four primary irrational numbers, the Planck base units, continuity-symmetry-harmony and the nature of the infinite, the first second of the universe, or general relativity, gravity, and quantum indeterminacy? Is that fair?”
Thank you.
Most sincerely,
Bruce
Second email: May 29, 2024
http://81018.com/202-1/#Email Note: Approaching the one year anniversary of my first note, I’ll often send a quick question. Subir Sarkar celebrated his 70th birthday with a three-day gathering of co-authors and associates reviewing the significant thoughts of a lifetime of explorations.
First email: 23 June 2023
Dear Prof. Dr. Subir Sarkar,
A quick YES-NO-MAYBE would be helpful.
We are high school people who backed into a model of the universe that easily absorbed the big bang because it used base-2 notation to go from Planck’s natural units to the current time in just 202 notations. The first second is between Notations 143 and 144. The embedded links just above are:
– https://81018.com/home/
– https://81018.com/calculations/
– https://81018.com/chart/
We quickly turned to experts. Many told us that this base-2 chart of the universe appeared to be the first ever posted, but that it is idiosyncratic. Yet, there were folks like Frank Wilczek and Freeman Dyson who encouraged us.
We tried to imagine that first notation and moment in time. Although we started by going deeper and deeper inside a tetrahedron (45 notations to the fermion and 67 more to Planck’s base units), a mentor, Philip Davis from Brown University, suggested that we entertain the circle-sphere but he died before we could not get him to comment on our discovery of the scholarship around cubic-close packing and how spheres and circles can create tetrahedrons and ultimately those 202 Planck’s base notations to the current time.
Embedded links:
– https://81018.com/wilczek/
– https://81018.com/dyson/
– https://81018.com/philip_davis/
– https://81018.com/ccp/
– https://81018.com/tot-2/
– https://81018.com/chart/
I suspect that’s too much of an introduction, yet along the way we discovered new geometries, possibly new insights into quantum fluctuations, and space-time. It’s all a bit crazy…too idiosyncratic to be cool!
Yet, from your webpages, your writings, and videos, I have some hope that you might give me a little encouragement or even possibly advice “to step down.” Is it worth the time to go on?
Thank you.
Most sincerely,
Bruce
###