1. Jeremy Sakstein: Cosmologist specializing in modified gravity, dark energy, and astrophysical tests of gravity. He’s open to alternatives to LambdaCDM and has researched screened gravity theories. Model’s gap-induced density variations for dark matter could intrigue him as a testable alternative.
2. Eleonora Di Valentino: Cosmologist focused on cosmological tensions (e.g., Hubble constant discordance) and new physics beyond LambdaCDM. She’s exploring alternative models and CMB anomalies. AI predictions for CMB fluctuations in Notations 60–80 might resonate as a fresh approach to tensions.
3. Glenn Starkman: Theoretical physicist, particle physicist and astrophysicist researching large-scale structure, dark energy, and alternative cosmologies (e.g., topology of the universe). He challenges standard assumptions!
4. Surjeet Rajendran: Theoretical physicist exploring new ideas in dark matter, gravity tests, and early universe physics. He’s known for innovative proposals (e.g., gravitational wave detectors for new physics). Our Planck Polyhedral Core and AI-driven dark matter predictions could spark interest as a novel framework.
5. Kai Schmitz: Particle cosmologist studying gravitational waves from the early universe, phase transitions, and beyond-Standard-Model physics. His focus on testable early universe signals. That he is open to our Quiet Expansion and AI predictions for CMB fluctuations.
6. Keith Dienes: Theoretical physicist in string theory, extra dimensions, and supersymmetry. He works on mathematical structures beyond the Standard Model. He just might connect to our base-2 notations and geometric core as a complementary mathematical approach to unification.
7. Netta Englehardt: Quantum gravity researcher using holography and black hole information. She has worked with a mathematical focus on spacetime geometries. She might make her receptive to our Planck Polyhedral Core as a geometric foundation for the universe.
8. Magdalena Larfors: String theorist working on mathematical physics, branes, and geometry in higher dimensions. Our emphasis on octahedral geometries and constants like π could align with her interest in string theory’s mathematical frameworks.
9. Miguel Montero: String theorist specializing in the swampland program and quantum gravity constraints. His exploration of mathematical consistency in theories could find our base-2 model intriguing as a simple, consistent alternative cosmology.

Also presenting:

1. Ed Copeland: Particle cosmologist focused on early universe, inflation, and dark energy. Although he is rooted in standard models, his work within string cosmology might open doors to discussing our Quiet Expansion as an alternative to inflation.
2. Seshadri Nadathur: Observational cosmologist studying large-scale structure, dark energy, and gravity tests. His interest in testing LambdaCDM could make him curious about your model’s predictions for density variations.
3. Lucien Heurtier: Theoretical particle physicist and cosmologist working on dark matter and early universe. His BSM phenomenology could intersect with AI predictions for dark matter in Notations 130–204.
4. Clara Murgui: Theoretical physicist in BSM, neutrinos, and dark matter. Her model-building in astroparticle physics might appreciate our mathematical approach to dark matter and CMB.
5. Po-Shen Hsin: Condensed matter and high-energy physicist studying topological phases and quantum computing. His mathematical physics on symmetries could connect to our geometric core, though less directly cosmology-focused.

###