Kenneth Ascher, University of California at Irvine
Homepage(s): PDF, ArXiv, Google Scholar (more to come)
Second email: 7 March 2025
Dear Prof. Dr. Kenneth Ascher:
We continue to make unusual claims based on simple but rarely discussed geometries. Here are a few questions for you:
- A geometry for the four primary irrational numbers: Have you seen the four hexagonal plates within every octahedron? https://81018.com/octahedron-game/
- Could the four primary irrational numbers work together within those plates at the most infinitesimal level (Planck’s base units)? Our report about it: Breakthroughs Indeed! Grok re-write: A quicker read.
- Are you familiar with his object defined by five tetrahedrons on top of five octahedrons on top of five tetrahedrons: https://81018.com/15-2/ I cannot find anything written about it so I did
Thank you.
Most sincerely,
Bruce
PS. Our March 14 PiDay celebrate here: https://81018.com/pi-day-2025/
First email: 4 December 2024
RE: “Outreach – “I am actively involved with the high school iteration of Math CEO.”
Dear Prof. Dr. Kenneth Ascher:
You’ve been a foremost scholar for all of your adult life — Brown, MIT, Princeton… Years ago we lived within sight of the UCI campus. I was encouraged to write given your outreach to high schools through the UCI program, Math CEO.
Our work started inside the tetrahedron and its octahedron within: https://81018.com/tot-2/
That was in 2011: https://81018.com/home/ We had our own homemade models and went within that model (on paper) 45 steps (by dividing the edges in half and connecting those new vertices). We were within the range of participle physics. We went the next 67 notations within and stopped within the Planck scale. We also multiplied the edges by 2 and went out to the edges of the observable universe. Here is our chart from 2011: https://81018.com/big-board/
We have continued playing with these models and discovered how idiosyncratic we been. It’s been fun but remains quite a challenge to reconcile it with big bang cosmology: https://81018.com/correct/ Our new chart of numbers: https://81018.com/chart/
With your depth of knowledge, do you have any insights where we have gone wrong? Thank you.
Most sincerely,
Bruce
###