# Jean-Luc Lehners

Max Planck Research Group Theoretical Cosmology

ArXiv: No Smooth Beginning for spacetime

Facebook

*Homepage*

Twitter

Wikipedia

YouTube: Falling Walls 2011 (transcript)

Within this website: To keep track of our research of the work of special scholars like Lehners, we have started this page. You will find references to his work on the following pages:

• Get a grip. Get the universe

• If Turok Tells Us That Hawking Is Wrong, The Big Bang Apple Is Falling

First email: Sunday, June 18, 2017

RE: Might we add a radically different possibility to your Multiverse and bubble universe collection? We’re not cosmologists, just students.

References: http://www.aei.mpg.de/2062163/ohne-urknall-geht-es-nicht

Dear Prof. Dr. Jean-Luc Lehners:

Thank you for your prodigious work. Thank you for your openness to new ideas. Today, I beg your patience with a naive, simple idea that originated in a high school geometry class in 2011. By doubling the Planck base units, over and over and over again, the results are an interesting map of the universe whereby everything starts simply, quietly and infinitesimally… certainly not super hot.

There are just 202 doublings from the Planck Length and Planck Time to the Observable Universe and Age of the Universe. The first second is between notations 143 and 144.

At the 149th notation the universe is now 38.47 seconds old. At 11,533,588.224 kilometers, the length is almost 10 times larger than the diameter of our sun (1.392 million kilometers). The mass at 1.5532×1036 kilograms is now substantially greater than the sun (1.989×1030 kilograms). The coulombs number has grown to 1.3384×1027 or 1338 yottacoulombs.

**Notation** **Doubling of **

** —- Planck Time** **Planck Length ** **Planck Mass** **Planck Charge**

173 **645,492,017.5 s** 1.935015×10^{17} km **2.605×10 ^{43 }kg** 2.245×10

^{34 }C

**199**

**4.331×10**1.298×10

^{16 }s^{24}km 1.748×10

^{51 }kg 1.506×10

^{42}C

I know this is a very cursory introduction. The embedded link above goes to the chart of numbers: https://81018.com/chart We know that it is entirely idiosyncratic, however, your video on YouTube reflects a special integrity.

Are we just being silly? Could simple math and simple logic have given us a simple foundation for the first bubble?

Thank you.

Most sincerely,

Bruce

***************

Bruce Camber

http://81018.com

PS. Given challenges by friends and family, I am now working on three articles in an attempt to explain this chart in a more systematic and visual manner. With all my deep limitations, you know that it is a very steep challenge indeed. -B

More notes:

*LAST SCATTERING* SURFACE. According to the standard Big Bang theory, the *early Universe* was sufficiently hot for all the matter in it to be fully ionised. … These photons reach present-day observers as the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB).

__Job Feldbrugge__, Jean-Luc Lehners, Neil Turok ** No smooth beginning for spacetime**. 2017. [arXiv][pdf]