Upon learning about the work of Pingwen Zhang

TO: Pingwen Zhang, Peking University, Beijing, China
FM: Bruce E. Camber
RE: Your writing in ArXiv, especially Boundary problems for the fractional and tempered fractional operators, 2017, as well as your CV & Google Citations, Homepage, and your Research, especially Mathematical analysis of multi-scale models of complex fluids [PDF] and your YouTube videos. Your students, I can see from your page linked here, are your joy.

This page URL: https://81018.com/zhang/ is our page about your work. These are here to remind us what I have earlier said. These pages will be removed if you prefer. -BEC

Third email: 30 October 2025

Dear Prof. Dr. Pingwen Zhang, 

Thank you for your insightful paper (arXiv:2510.17080) on the Landau–Brazovskii continuum. As a non-academic explorer of universe-scale geometry, I found your treatment of isotropic phase ordering particularly resonant. May I pose three brief questions? 

1. Is the Landau–Brazovskii continuum inherently scale-invariant? 

2. Could such ordering persist at infinitesimal wavenumbers—below current measurement thresholds? 

3. Might these phase transitions extend, in principle, down to the Planck scale? 

We are testing these ideas within a geometric framework that maps 202 base-2 notations from Planck units to the current age (~13.8 billion years). Your continuum may offer a bridge between microscale ordering and large-scale structure — see: https://81018.com/where/ 

Would you welcome updates as our thought experiments evolve? Thank you for your time and consideration. 

Most sincerely, 

Bruce Camber 

https://81018.com | Independent researcher, USA

P.S. Two concise overviews, if useful:
• Universe as a geometric lattice: https://81018.com/universe-geometry/
• Six-point toy model: https://81018.com/six-points/

Second email: April 6, 2019

Dear Prof. Dr. Pingwen Zhang:

You may find our last three articles about our idiosyncratic model of the universe to be of some interest:

There is also a page of references to your work: https://81018.com/zhang/

These pages help me remember to whom I have written and what I have said.

Thank you.

Most sincerely,

Bruce

First email: February 1, 2019

Dear Prof. Dr. Pingwen Zhang:

We are relatively new to the study of multiscale modeling. Would you please advise us if it is appropriate to begin our model at the Planck scale and to apply a simple doubling mechanism (ostensibly base-2 exponential notation) to that scale? The results are endlessly fascinating to us, but we are afraid that we may be breaking some important rules of the discipline. In 202 notations we created a multiscale model that encompasses all of time. Given simple logic is logic, it might just encompass all physical space, all mass and all charge throughout the universe. Rather silly, isn’t it? Or, is it?  We are consulting with specialists around the world and would dearly appreciate your advice regarding multiscale modeling. Thank you.

Most sincerely,

Bruce

PS. Key pages within our website are as follows:
1. Our chart of numbers from the Planck scale: http://81018.com/chart/
2. Our assumptions: http://81018.com/boundary/
3. Our interpretation of the first 64 notation: http://81018.com/dark/
4. Our start to redefine infinity: http://81018.com/infinity/

###