Center for Perfection Studies • The Big Board–Little Universe Project New Orleans • USA • May 2017 •
Homepages: NASA Reports|1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|10|11|12|13|14|15|16|17|18|19|20|21|22|Original
We’ve got work to do.
First, it seems the Big Bang theory has run its course. Stephen Hawking, its #1 progenitor, got a good forty years out of it; but an ageing big bang is weak science (there’s no math), dubious philosophy, and nihilistic psychology. Then, there’s Isaac Newton; 300 years earlier, he did even more damage when he foisted absolute space and time on us. Today many of our best scientists want to throw all of these concepts under the bus. As deferentially as possible, we ask, “Could we redefine these concepts in light of our highly-integrated UniverseView?“
Let’s talk and let’s get to work!
- Contact! Edward Witten: A brief note to a leading scholar about the Big Board-little universe project.
- Another contact: Brandon Brown, author, Planck: Driven by Vision, Broken by War
- Open Letter to the editors of Science (magazine) of the American Association for the Advancement of Scienc
- Simple View of the Universe
- An Integrated Universe View: What is your expertise? There are many blanks within many cells — over 2000 of them in the entire chart — so, we assume it will always be “under construction.”
Recent-and-related:
- Measuring an Expanding Universe Using Planck Units (work in progress)
- Background
- Very Small-Scale Universe
- NASA SpaceApp Challenge Reports
Worldviews limit perspective 