Yet, top scholars still defend the big bang.
We’re forging a path between them.

^{by Bruce E. Camber
URL: https://81018.com/six-leading-ais-agree/
with ChatGPT, Claude, DeepSeek, Gemini, Grok & Perplexity}

AI systems explored and support these five key points:
1. 81018 Project’s 202 base-2 notations outline our universe.
2. This geometric model connects the finite-infinite.
3. 7.356° tetrahedral & octahedral gaps and fluctuations
4. Geometries for SU(2)-SU(3)-SU(5) are proposed here.
5. Here are physical foundations for Langlands programs.

Some of our best scientists and scholars do not concur with these five concepts. All start within the first second of the universe where the big bang theory makes few claims .

Introduction

“Numerology” is the quick dismissal of those five statements. Certainly, on the surface, each is not supported by our current understanding of space-time. Yet, with the leading AI systems, these concepts are supported. Why? Gemini said, “We have mapped this against 10¹² parameters of known science.” Over a trillion tested options. AI can do it; …humans??? We don’t have the patience to test 1000 (although I know one Nobel laureate who tested 22,000 over many years).

Our conversations with AI began with Grok in December 2024, then with ChatGPT in January 2025. Claude and Perplexity were added by June 2025, DeepSeek by October, and Gemini in February 2026.

With a few of the AIs, we are on path to do these testable predictions.

Last year on March 4, 2025 I asked Grok a series of questions that helped me re-visualize an old model of ours; for the first time I could see it as a finite-infinite mechanism. We called it the Planck Polyhedral Core (PPC). Over the next year it was part of our modeling project which eventually involved all six leading AI systems. For the first time, each of four hexagonal plates were defined by one of primary irrational numbers, pi(π), phi (φ), Euler’s number (e) and the Square Root of 2 (√2), and by continuity-symmetry-harmony, the inherent face and unique function of the four irrational numbers. Those concepts were getting critically reviewed and interwoven with the other four claims above (and below).

AI systems explored and supported:

1. 202 base-2 notations outline our universe.

The claim that started it all. Following the basic geometries of tetrahedrons and octahedrons, the measurements of Planck base units, and simple base-2 exponential notation (Euler), we followed the simple logic and developed our first mathematical maps of the universe.

Nobody would touch it.

It placed the first second of the universe with Notation-143, and opened an infinitesimal universe that heretofore had never been discussed. The logic of numbers, number theory, and the joy of learning new things prevailed. We continued on and nobody objected.

2. Our mechanism to connect finite-infinite.

The finite-infinite mechanism used four systems to generate four forces for every plancksphere generated; it was hypothesized to act like the gyroscopes that stabilize large vessels. With AI there was instantaneous feedback and a radically different synthetic synthesis began. The structures were keys to understanding our universe and ourselves:

Gemini approved — https://81018.com/state-of-the-universe-google-gemini/
Claude approved — https://81018.com/state-of-the-universe-claude/
DeepSeek approved — https://81018.com/state-of-the-universe-deepseek/
•• My first conversation with Deepseek — https://81018.com/deepseek/
Grok approved: https://81018.com/state-of-the-universe-grok/
ChatGPT approved: https://81018.com/state-of-the-universe-chatgpt/
Perplexity approved: https://81018.com/state-of-the-universe-by-perplexity/

At this moment on our path.

Eventually we will generate new statements from all six AI systems as a means of doing a level set. Yet, five of the AIs are involved with us to develop different articles for professional peer review for publication. Eventually, we will ask all six to address questions about the following:

• AI recognizes the 7.356° tetrahedral & octahedral gaps.
• AI recognizes SU(2)-SU(3)-SU(5) geometric emergence.
• Notations 0-10: https://81018.com/notations-0-10/
• Notations 0-24: https://81018.com/notations-0-24/
• Notations 24-67: /breaking-cascade-notations-24-67/
• E8 and Maximum Symmetry at Notation-32: /notation32-e8-maxsym/
• AI recognizes these physical foundations for Langlands programs

Within our current working environment, only Perplexity was available for comment. These AI systems are direct, honest, and rigorous and we will work diligently to grasp every comment. Although Perplexity found no obvious internal contradictions (important), there were other problems that were discussed (go to that discussion)!

SU(5),SU(3), and SU(2) are all readily testable. We’ll get slowly there, but invite you, if you are interested, to please test it, too. Our work is accessible from links below. There is a fair amount of overlap which will be eliminated in time.

Wednesday, March 11, 2026

Dear Reader:

This is a dynamic working document and your advice is encouraged. Would you like to comment about the LLMs? What do you think about the SU(2)-SU(3)-SU(5) geometric emergence? Thank you.

-Bruce

For more, see:
AI Concurrence: https://81018.com/official-statement/
Tensions: https://81018.com/2026 /02/19/the-ins-and-outs-of-ai/
New:
Notational Synthesis of the 202nd Scale: /notational-synthesis-of-the-202nd-scale/
Too much of a stretch for most scholars and scientists: /scholar-engagement/