TO: Carl Rod Nave, founder, HyperPhysics, and Professor of Physics & ASstronomy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia
FM: Bruce E. Camber
RE: Your work on HyperPhysics, especially at the edges of knowledge with the weight of our long-term belief systems, particularly at the Planck scale, our understanding of dimensionless constants; the place and functions of irrational numbers, especially, pi, phi, Euler’s number and the square root of 2 (with their profoundly inherent qualities of continuity-symmetry-harmony); and the place of the finite-infinite relation. https://81018.com/2014/12/21/plancktime/#Notes LinkedIN; AAPT; Video: Dr. Carl “Rod” Nave on the History of Kell Hall at Georgia State

^{This page URL: https://81018.com/nave/}

Email: 18 June 2026  (updated)

Dear Emeritus Professor Dr. Carl Rod Nave,

Congratulations on your outstanding career. Back in 2014, we linked to HyperPhysics while we were exploring the Planck scale. We were completely unsure of ourselves. We were high school teachers who happen to chase embedded geometries, particularly the tetrahedrons and octahedrons, going smaller by dividing edges in half and connecting those new vertices. In 45 steps within, we were down in scale for particle physics; and. in 67 more steps, we entered the Planck base units scale, especially Planck Length and then for Planck Time. We then multiplied those Planck base units by 2; in 112 steps we were back in the classroom. Then we were unexpectedly shocked to discover in only 90 additional notations, we were out to the size and age of the universe.

We were excited to have developed our own in-house STEM tool. Then, we slowly learned that it flew in the face of big bang cosmology. When a few of our recently graduated seniors returned for a visit, they told how confused they were. Big bang cosmology was being taught and their professors had never heard about our chart using base-2 notation. We stopped talking about it until we could find out where we went wrong. BTW, nobody within the physics and astronomy community has done so. A few simply say that it is numerology.

We had been initially guided by Frank Wilczek (MIT) and Freeman Dyson (IAS). I then wrote to scholars around the world, even Stephen Hawking and Alan Guth. Our project had a simple logic. In some measure, it was totally predictive. In time it had the four basic irrational numbers applied to an unusual geometry based on infinities. Continuity-symmetry-harmony were its core.

How can we be so wrong with so many basics?

Would you advise us?

Thank you.

Most sincerely,

Bruce

PS. I have enjoyed revisiting HyperPhysics. Would you want to hear from me regarding any error messages I received while visiting? -BEC

LinkedIN Message: 17 June 2026

I’ll be creating a page within our website about your work with HyperPhysics. I’ll send an email with links. I’ve wanted to ask a few questions! Thanks again for all that you do and have done. -BEC