Maldacena, Juan M.

Juan M. Maldacena

Institute for Advanced Study
Princeton, NJ 08540

Articles: Entanglement and the Geometry of Spacetime
ArXiv:  Eternal traversable wormhole
Publications: Most cited since 1997 (15,000+ by September 2018)
_____________  The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity
 _____________ Int.J.Theor.Phys. 38 (1999) 1113–1133, [hep-th/9711200].
YouTube: Black Holes and the Structure of Spacetime (2018)
 _____________ (scroll to 1:31 at the beginning of the lecture)
 ____________ _July 20, 2010, AdS/CFT I think is a bad name. It should be called,
 ____________Quantum Field Theory / Quantum Gravity Duality / Gauge Gravity Duality.”

First email: Tuesday, 25 September 2018

Dear Prof. Dr. Juan Maldacena:PlanckTime

Is it reasonable to consider Max Planck’s simple definition of time when we talk about the interior of the space-time?

Planck TimePlanck’s more simple formulation computes well with the experimental results. And, of course, if we were to apply base-2 notation to Planck Time, there would be a small variable as each quantity is multiplied by 2. It appears to remain within 1% throughout all 202 notations from Planck Time to the current time or age of the universe.c=pl/pt

By inserting the other base units along this scale of the universe, the data sets become more challenging, yet the simple correspondence between length and time tells a profound story. The correspondence with mass and charge, though stretching the imagination, still retains a deep logic and continuity.

Might you comment? Just nonsense?

Thank you.

Most sincerely,
Bruce Camber

PS. This work started in a New Orleans high school geometry class where we chased Zeno’s paradox to the Planck Wall and then asked, “What else can we do?”
Related links:
Chart of numbers: (see line 10)
A little background story:

More references:
The symmetry and simplicity of the laws of physics and the Higgs boson
Juan Maldacena 2016 Eur. J. Phys. 37 015802