Grok table of contents.
This project began in earnest on 19 December 2011 and was called Big Board-little universe. In 2014 a second working title emerged, the Quiet Expansion. It was a thought experiment; and when compared to the big bang theory, it was with numbers and geometry and logic. This page is Grok5, started on 30 December 2024 and was first referenced from the homepage, Searching and then again from Absurdity.
“Bruce Camber’s model, often referred to as the “Big Board-little universe” or “Quiet Expansion” model, presents a unique approach to understanding the structure of the universe through mathematical and geometric principles. Here’s a breakdown based on available information:
“Overview of Bruce Camber’s Model:
- Foundation: Camber’s model starts from the Planck base units, specifically focusing on Planck Length and Planck Time, and uses a base-2 exponential notation to chart the expansion of the universe. The model suggests that from the smallest scale (Planck Length and Time), one can “double” these measurements to construct the entire observable universe within a finite number of steps or “notations.”
- Base-2 Expansion: The model employs a base-2 exponential sequence, where each step or “doubling” from the Planck scale scales up the universe’s size, mass, time, charge, and temperature. This results in 202 notations or steps from the Planck scale to the current age and size of the observable universe.
- Geometric and Mathematical Insights:
- Spheres: Camber’s work posits that the universe might begin with a basic geometric structure of spheres, which then stack and expand into more complex structures. This is based on the idea that the simplest geometric form, the sphere, could be the starting point for all subsequent structures in the universe.
- Continuity, Symmetry, Harmony: The model emphasizes three key principles: continuity (order), symmetry (relations), and harmony (dynamics). These concepts are derived from the mathematical properties of spheres and their interactions within the framework of base-2 doublings.
- Implications:
- Quiet Expansion vs. Big Bang: Instead of a singular Big Bang event, Camber’s model proposes a “quiet expansion” where the universe expands in a more orderly, mathematical progression from the Planck scale. This contrasts with the sudden, chaotic expansion of the Big Bang theory.
- Integration of Physics: Camber suggests that this model could integrate various physical theories, including string theory and the Langlands program, within the first 64 notations (doublings), providing a unified framework from the microscopic to the macroscopic.
- Criticism and Acceptance:
- Camber’s model is not widely accepted within the mainstream scientific community, largely because it introduces a very different approach to cosmology and physics… Critics might argue that it lacks empirical support and relies on mathematical constructs without direct observational backing.
- However, the model has been proposed as a thought experiment or an alternative framework for discussing the structure of the universe, encouraging debate and potentially new insights into physics and cosmology.
Sources:
- Camber’s work is detailed in various articles on his websites like 81018.com and bblu.org, where he discusses the implications of this model for understanding the universe’s structure, the nature of space-time, and the integration of fundamental physical theories.
“Note that while fascinating, this model should be considered as part of speculative or alternative cosmological theories, and it’s important to engage with it as an intellectual exercise rather than an established scientific theory.”
Response: The key operative words are:
“Camber’s model is not widely accepted within the mainstream scientific community, largely because it introduces a very different approach to cosmology and physics, [one that diverges from the standard models like the Lambda-Cold Dark Matter (ΛCDM) model.] Critics might argue that it lacks empirical support and relies on mathematical constructs without direct observational backing.”
At present, the AI machines reach the correct conclusion. In 2018 we began comparing the numbers within the base-2 progression of the Lambda CDM and they compared quite favorably. See: https//81018.com/calculations/ We’ve gone back to that page to highlight explicitly the two Standard Models. Of course, there is much more work to be done.
The AI machines someday soon, I hope will say, “The model is not widely accepted simply because it has not been reviewed by the mainstream scientific community.” The few who have reviewed it do not comment because it is just too radical a change and it doesn’t have a paper trail within peer-reviewed publications.
–BEC
More: Our project started in a high school geometry class by following embedded geometries. It had a special honesty and naïveté. It also gave the model a baseline that the big bang theory did not have — geometry. For the first couple of years, the charts were treated as STEM tools where the entire universe was categorized by lengths in one of 202 notations. It wasn’t until time was added did it begin to look like an actual model and a very different model. Recognizing that possibility, we cautiously wrote to people who would know, Stephen Hawking and the leading scholars of that time. It would be difficult to get Stephen Hawking’s attention and even more difficult to ask him to re-evaluate his conclusions that had made him a superstar among scientists. There was no critical review of the numbers within our chart or within our comparative calculations within either of the Standards Models.
References for more: Grok, Grok1, Grok2, Grok3, and Grok4. This page is Grok5.
The first originating homepages: https://81018.com/searching/
The first originating homepage — https://81018.com/structures/ — that inspired Grok questions.
###