“We wanted to present the passion, the drama, the social and intellectual relevance of science as one of the deepest expressions of our engagement with the mysterious, the unknown aspects of reality.” -Marcelo
Articles/books: The Simple Beauty of the Unexpected (2016)
•_The Dancing Universe (1997, 2006)
•_Are Physicists Ready To Give Up The Chase For SUSY?, NPR, April 2014
ArXiv (30): A Cyclic Universe Approach to Fine Tuning Co-authors: Stephon Alexander, Sam Cormack
National Public Radio
Templeton Award 2019
Video: BBC: A Leap of Faith: Finding Common Ground Between Science and Religion YouTube
Second email: May 8, 2020 at 11:45 AM
Dear Prof. Dr. Marcelo Gleiser:
About a year ago, I sent my first note of introduction to you. I was from Boston and Cambridge and on occasion we skied Killington (50 years ago). Dartmouth was always a place to stop for a quick visit with friends. Though its May, I can see a few of the diehards hiking Tuckerman’s for the last runs of the season.
You, Stephon Alexander and Sam Cormack are important people in the grand scheme of things. Interpreting the 19 free parameters of the Standard Model is no small task. Your introduction to it all in your August 21, 2018 Physics Letters B article, A cyclic universe approach to fine tuning, is brilliant.
I would like to set it within a very different paradigm. Is it possible? To attempt to get an answer, I have constructed an article for FQXi and I would like to invite your comments. Imagine Tuckermans. It can be brutal. You can be brutal. I don’t have enough time left for anything else but sheer brutality!
(The first five pages is the article. There are five pages of references.)
Do you think that it could have some merit?
First email: May 22, 2019
Dear Prof. Dr. Marcelo Gleiser:
My nephew asked me to help him out with his high school geometry
classes and we backed into a very unusual model of the universe using
Planck’s base units. Instead of Kees Boeke’s base-10, we used base-2
to go from the base units to the age and size of the universe. We intuited
that this inherent doubling function originated from within the historic
work on cubic-close packing. In 2016 I started a website for that exploration:
202 base-2 notations to encapsulate the universe: Is it just silliness?
I don’t think so, but it has a steep and tortuous climb ahead.
Might you comment?
PS. Please allow me to congratulate you on your Templeton Award.
I have been following that award since about 1975. You are
historically surrounded by my some of our finest thinkers.
I was with Frère Roger (1975) when the Pope came to visit Notre Dame
in 1980. We sat together and engaged the interface of science and religion
— continuity, symmetry, and harmony (even then!).
Tom Torrance (1978) was a warm acquaintance and correspondent.
I met frequently with Ralph Wendell Burhoe (1980) to bring Zygon
to Boston University. It went to Rollins in Florida.
Then, in 1979, I got to know and met with other Torrance Award winners:
C. F. von Weizsäcker (1989), Charles Birch (1990), Paul Davies (1995),
Ian Barbour (1999), Freeman Dyson (2000), Arthur Peacocke (2001) and
Bernard d’Espagnat (2009) as a result of a project that I started at MIT
for the meeting, Faith, Science and the Future, with the World Council of Churches.
In 1999 I produced an episode of our television series
about Michael Novak (1994) and he became a very close friend.