TO: Ignatios Antoniadis, Director, Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Hautes Énergies (LPTHE), Sorbonne Université, CNRS, 4 Place Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France; Now IAS.
FM: Bruce E. Camber
RE: Your work within arXiv (116-210); as listed within Google Scholar; your homepage(s): IAS, LPTHE–Key HellenicaWorld, MDPI-Editor, Orcid, Researchgate, Sciprofiles; and your publications such as Scale hierarchies, supersymmetry and cosmology, World Scientific (2018 ); and YouTube
This page: https://81018.com/antoniadis/
Fourth email: 14 February 2026
Dear Prof. Dr. Ignatios Antoniadis:
Google AI Gemini with Grok, Perplexity, ChatGPT, Claude and DeepSeek have each become Synthetic Peer Reviewers of our work. Gemini have validated our model in the face of the big bang theory. What do you make of it?
Thank you.
Most sincerely,
Bruce
Third email: 4 July 2023 at 4:00 PM
Dear Prof. Dr. Ignatios Antoniadis:
At the Institute for Advanced Studies, you are a scholar’s scholar. And, certainly being part of CNRS is the among the highest of all possible endorsements of your work. So I recognize my earlier two notes below are entirely presumptuous; what can a leading scholar learn from high school people? Notwithstanding, knowing that we know that we lack the deep connective tissue, can innocent questions make a difference to one of the world’s leading string theorists:
1. Can we start tabula rasa from PlanckTime and the Planck base units?
2. Can we safely assume that the most simple thing to manifest would be a sphere?
3. Might sphere stacking and packing be the first dynamic to define space-time?
4. If we follow basic geometries and formulas (base-2), are the results meaningful?
5. Are sphere stacking, sphere packing, continuity equations and symmetry functions and the Fourier transform all viable?
6. Might there be a domain of perfection whereby all the geometries fit perfectly?
7. Might there be a much larger domain of imperfection created by geometries with gaps?
8. Do these geometries give Langlands, strings, SUSY, CDT, SSM and so on access to the grid?
9. Might those first 64 notations of the 202 be the domain dark matter-and-energy?
10. Might the continuity-symmetry-harmony of the sphere be a definition of infinity?
11. Is there an inherent expansion of the universe if there is one infinitesimal sphere per unit of PlanckTime?
12. Does this relation condition all that is finite?
Here are a few of the related URLs. If you’d like I will send a complete list.
https://81018.com/csh/
https://81018.com/chart/
https://81018.com/sphere/
https://81018.com/geometries/
https://81018.com/64-notations/
Thank you.
Warm regards,
Bruce
PS. As you can well-imagine, there have been many scholars who have been part of the institute whose writings we have studied. We’ll add your name to that list with a link to this page. As well, we’ll list you among today’s emails within today’s homepage: https://81018.com/penultimate-revolution/#Emails and, of course, this page is: https://81018.com/antoniadis/
Second email: 29 October 2021 Updated: Sept. 2023
Dear Prof. Dr. Ignatios Antoniadis:
Have you ever entertained the notion that the Planck scale (or its conceptual equivalent, i.e. Stoney’s numbers) might generate infinitesimal primordial spheres? Quite unlike Lemaître’s primordial atom, these spheres have only those facets needed to manifest as space-time. Are you aware that Lemaître’s 1927 postulations was for a cold start? Are both concepts easily beaten down within string theory? Thank you.
Warmly,
Bruce
PS. Because I would like to quote from your work, I have begun collecting articles by you and about you. There is a link to that page and one from our scholars’ page: https://81018.com/alphabetical/#Antoniadis Congratulations on becoming editor-in-chief of MDPI’s journal, Astronomy. -BEC
First email: 22 October 2021 Updated: Sept. 2023 (updated)
Dear Prof. Dr. Ignatios Antoniadis:
You were one of the speakers within the Planck 2021 IPPP-Durham University conference. I am first going through those papers, asking, “What are the most special insights from these 21 scholars? How do we get beyond the Standard Model without getting too far beyond it?” Then I am starting to read the papers of key people like you.
I know that we’ve gone a bit too far beyond the standard model. We started at the Planck scale with a concept not unlike Lemaître’s primordial sphere– the basics — just Planck’s base units and their dimensionless constants. If you have a moment, please take a look: http://81018.com/chart/
By applying base-2 notation at the Planck scale, there are 202 notations from Planck Time to this day. The numbers are fascinating, but interpreting those numbers is not easy.
Your comments and insights would be treasured. And, yes, we certainly realize how idiosyncratic that model is. Thank you.
Most sincerely,
Bruce