TO: Vlatko Vedral, Professor of Quantum Information Theory, University of Oxford,
Clarendon Laboratory, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PU, UK
FM: Bruce E. Camber
RE: Information on your homepage(s) and within ArXiv, your books, blog, Google, Oxford, inspireHEP, Substack, Videos, Wikipedia, YouTube, especially Decoding quantum reality, March 2025
This page is: https://81018.com/Vedral/
Fifth Email: 24 September 2025
Dear Prof. Dr. Vlatko Vedral,
First, which email address is most appropriate for me to use? Second, people are visiting our page about your work so I have updated it again. OK? I have sent five emails; I have received over 13 from you. Any changes? Third, is there any room within your theoretical construct for the four primary irrational numbers, each one a hexagonal plate intrinsic to the octahedron? It acts like a finite-infinite mechanism that seems to form on what I’ve called the finite-infinite bridge. See a dynamic image: https://81018.com/planck-polyhedral-core/
Thank you.
Warmly,
Bruce
Fourth Email: 13 March 2025
Dear Vlatko –
First, I’ve been updating our page about you. Do you have any additions, deletions, or changes to this file? https://81018.com/vedral/ Also, have you seen our 2025 version of the Pi Day page?https://81018.com/pi-day-2025 Have you ever seen a convergence of the four primary irrationals?https://81018.com/2025/03/04/grok-3/ Also: https://81018.com/grok-3/ It seems very possible.
Yours sincerely,
Bruce
Third Email plus Your Forms: 5 March 2025
Dear Prof. Dr. Vlatko Vedral,
My style when I send email is to be formal. My posts through online forms are quite informal. Here is what I said trying to send it through your forms:
“Would you please comment on https://81018.com/grok-3/ as a follow-up of my two earlier emails? Our reference page to your work and my emails is https://81018.com/vedral/ (this page).”
I had a problem with your forms page; on the page return to me, there was no submit button! I thought, “Perhaps Submit and ‘clear’ are automated.”
Best wishes to you and thanks again for all that you do you.
Warmly,
Bruce
Second communication: Email - 7 November 2024
Vlatko – I received your email today from Substack. Laughing. Wincing. “What? …your amp is up full (blasting away at 11)?” I was age 11 and had my ears operated on a second time. Protect your ears. My hearing loss is severe; probably the next step is implants.
I just stopped again, this time because of your page of book references! Excellent. Oxford. Excellent.
Do you know about Aristotle’s Mistake: https://81018.com/too-simple/ https://81018.com/biased/#Aristotle https://81018.com/aristotle/
Now at about 8 AM I sent a note through your form at https://www.vlatkovedral.com/about/ (reconstructing it at 3:21 PM so things might not be verbatim). If you happen to notice it, could you send a copy of it back to me and I’ll correct that reconstructed version below on my page about your work — https://81018.com/vedral/
You are a remarkable scholar. I am making notes about that work on this page (https://81018.com/vedral/) as I go through it. Congratulations. Extraordinary.
Warmly,
Bruce
PS. Yes, I have started a reference page for your work here: https://81018.com/Vedral/ It is so I can read what I have said to you before writing again! -BEC
First DM: 7 November 2024 at 9 AM (reconstructed)
Dear Prof. Dr. Vlatko Vedral,
Are the natural units, all the numbers derived by Max Planck in and around 1899 really real? If we assume so, if taken together, might they be considered a point particle or a shell sphere? Might the Planck base units define the first units of length, time, mass and charge? Could this “thing” defined by the Planck-numbers be manifest, one per every unit of Planck Time? Might we calculate that to be 18.5 tredecillion of these Planck-scale things manifesting every second? Might this thing be a infinitesimal sphere? Thank you.
Most sincerely,
Bruce
PS Obviously, this becomes a new starting point for a very different “big bang”: https://81018.com/202-1/
###