Monika Schleier-Smith, Physics, Stanford University
Return to our usual homepage at this time.

Dear Prof. Dr. Monika Schleier-Smith,

We can view the universe as 202 base-2 notations, starting at Planck Time and then come up to this very moment, the Now.  Here is a link to our little chart with its 202 columns of numbers. It is horizontally-scrolled! We started that exercise in 2011 in a New Orleans high school geometry class. We immediately began to ask, “Is it just a group of numbers or is it meaningful?”

Because we started within a tetrahedron and then the octahedron within it (by dividing the edges in half and connecting the new vertices), and then went deep down inside 112 steps to about the Planck Length, we thought, “Well, it has an imputed structure. That’s something.” We then used that Planck Length as the size of the edge of our first tetrahedron and multiplied by 2. In 67 notations we were up inside the CERN measurements for particle and waves. In another 45 notations we were back in the classroom. We kept going. In another 90 notations we were out on the edges of the universe and the current time at about 13.82 billion years.

We thought we had the penultimate STEM tool. After all, it seemed to include everything, everywhere for all time. Because our best attempts to write about it were consistently rejected, we have taken to web. Our URL — http://81018.com — opened in 2016.

We learned it was base-2 exponential notation. It paralleled the hundreds of trillions of mathematically defined units of pi (π). and it appeared to be the first mathematically-defined map of the universe from the first moment until Now.

While studying those numbers, its inherent logic, and geometries, the block from Notation-0 to Notation-64 was mysterious. What’s there? Also, it seemed that if it could be perfectly filled with simple geometries, something is there. In that time, we also discovered Aristotle’s mistake with the tetrahedron. It is little-known scholarship and I believe it might be near the edges of your research. I am now looking for the scales within which you are working. My guess is that your work would be in a range, possibly starting around our Notation 80 or 1.9538×10^-11 meters. Our Notation-67 is in-and-around 2.38509×10^-15 meters.

We wondered, “Is this the range where quantum fluctuations are detected?”

Yes, we have begun asking questions ourselves about the geometry of quantum fluctuations. It is here that we began thinking about Aristotle’s gap and other pentagonal gaps. We wondered, “Might that gap have something to do with quantum fluctuations?” Of course, we don’t know, but it has become a rather speculative conjecture; and, off the cuff, I wondered if you thought it might be worth pursuing? Thanks.

Warmly,

Bruce

_____

Protecting Spin Coherence in a Tunable Heisenberg Model, Emily J. Davis, Avikar Periwal, Eric S. Cooper, Gregory Bentsen, Simon J. Evered, Katherine Van Kirk, Monika H. Schleier-Smith, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 060402, 3 August 2020 ArXiv\

This page is https://81018.com/schleier-smith-2/ The original is https://81018.com/schleier-smith/#First

Go to a standard homepage: https://81018.com/missing-keys/