Third email: Thursday, December 26, 2019 @ 4:08 PM
I thought you might enjoy this page based on the work of
Artist/Scientist, Daniel Dominguez at CERN:
Second email: Monday, June 3, 2019 @ 7:08 PM
Dear Prof. Dr. John Ellis:
Of course, it would have been good to hear from you.
Not often do high school people come out with a 100% mathematical, an entirely-predictive, quiet expansion and a natural inflation of the universe. Also, it all begins like Lemaitre’s original model, very cold.
The logic is simple — the universe is exponential.
By the way, we are learning and making our distinctions between you and George Ellis.
Now, here’s an idea! Perhaps you two Ellis savants could do a joint article and a critically review of our high school logic!
Our working page about your work is here: https://81018.com/john-ellis/
First email: Monday, March 11, 2019, 9:20 PM
Dear Prof. Dr. John Ellis:
My introduction to you and your work was an August 2013 Interview with John Ellis that I read earlier today: https://ep-news.web.cern.ch/content/interview-john-ellis
Most recently, I’ve begun reading your ArXiv articles:
Probing the Scale of New Physics in the ZZ Coupling at e+e− Colliders
I would like to stretch our imaginations a little with a speculative idea, a what-if, so I beg that you will bear with me.
There are five very speculative concepts that form the basis of this idea.
1. A simple mathematical grid. Apply base-2 notation to the Planck base units to encapsulate the universe within 202 base-2 notations. We start at Planck Time and go to the present time.
3. Quantum fluctuations. Assume basic structure includes a five-tetrahedral unit; we have called it a pentastar. It has a gap (0.12838822… radians or 7.356103172… degrees) There is also the twenty-face icosahedron and the sixty-face pentakis dodecahedron. In each the same gaps that could readily manifest as quantum indeterminacy by the 64th notation.
4. Every notation is always emergent, never-ending, never-the-same. All time is Now. Obviously, within the 202nd notation, there is a perception of past-present-and-future, a sense of time. This notation is 10.9 billion years and only about 2.84 of it has emerged.
5. Re-open the doors to define more deeply the concept of infinity. We’ve got to lighten up a little. It is obvious nobody is making progress with the old-time debate, but some progress just might be able to be made both within mathematics and physics: https://81018.com/infinity/
It is such a different model, it is hard to engage. It took me the better part of four years to realize this model was more than a STEM tool. Our little history is here: https://81018.com/home/. My whole story is here and an introduction here.
Idiosyncratic to be sure. Where does our simple logic and simple math break down? Thank you so very much.