
TO: Giuseppe Dattoli, ENEA – Frascati Research Centre, Research Director, Lungotevere Thaon di Revel, 76 00196, ROMA, Italia
FM: Bruce E. Camber (See: A Mathematical Model of the Universe)
RE: Your articles in AIP Publishing, ArXiv: The fine structure constant and numerical alchemy, 2010; and your books: Vedic Mathematics: A Mathematical Tale From The Ancient Veda To Modern Times, Giuseppe Dattoli, Silvia Licciardi, Marcello Artioli, World Scientific Publishing (WSP), 2021; Mathematical Methods for Physicists, Danilo Babusci, G. Dattoli, S. Licciardi, WSP, Sep 24, 2019; Some Properties and Generating Functions of Generalized Harmonic Numbers, Dattoli, Licciardi, E. Sabia, Hari Mohan Srivastava, June 2019; The Euler Legacy to Modern Physics, Giuseppe Dattoli, M. Del_Franco, Seminario Interdisciplinare di Matematica, Vol. 9(2010), pp. 1–24; and dblp, IEEE, Wolfram, zbMath, inSPIREHEP and other publications like Exponential parameterization of quark mixing matrix, arXiv:1301.5111, 2013; and your YouTube: Possibly an interview at the 17th Lomonosov Conference, 2015, See 1:34:25 / 1:41:27
The URL for this page: https://81018.com/dattoli/
Third email: 18 October 2025
Dear Dr. Giuseppe Dattoli:
Recently several AI platforms have been enthusiastic about our base-2 model. For the past 15 years I’ve asked expert observers like you to help assess its validity and potential implications. Recently, I reduced to a toy model and more recently, it all rendered a simple quantitative model that derives the Hubble constant from first principles at the Planck scale.
The core of the model is surprisingly straightforward: it posits that the Hubble constant emerges not from dark energy, but from a cosmological process defined by base-2 scaling from the Planck units. A key result is a direct mathematical derivation of H₀, “Toy Model Derivation of the Hubble Constant” It is here — 81018.com/hubble-derivation/— still a highly speculative proposal, the numerical correspondence is striking.
Is this a numerical coincidence, or does it point to a deeper rather overlooked principle? We hope to discover as we continue to build on our dynamic model of a finite-infinite grid and its Lagrangian.
Thank you for your time and for your contributions to our understanding of the cosmos.
Sincerely,
Bruce
P.S. The URL for our study of your work: https://81018.com/guiot/
- https://81018.com/
- https://81018.com/deepseek/
- https://81018.com/assume/
- https://81018.com/hubble-derivation/
- https://81018.com/planck-polyhedral-core/
- Lagrangian: https://81018.com/lagrangian/
- Bruce E. Camber: https://81018.com/bec/
Second email: 29 August 2024
Dear Dr. Giuseppe Dattoli:
You’re six years younger than me. It seems we are all racing to the end. Cataclysmically.
Now, I wrote to you three years ago. I did not receive a response. There were five simple Yes/No questions. I suspect, even in light of your Vedic appreciations, there would be five “No” answers. If you care to look at my copy of the email, it is on the web at https://81018.com/dattoli/
I entreat you to take a look at the website. It is quite idiosyncratic, I know, but maybe you will have a few suggestions for me. Also, I would be glad to add anything to my page about your work.
Most sincerely,
Bruce
First email: 25 August 2021 at 8 PM
Dear Dr. Giuseppe Dattoli:
I am reading your work and creating a reference page to that work: https://81018.com/dattoli/ It is my only way of keep track of all this information. If you’ll give us permission to use one of your images, it will be added this page. Your name is also added to a list of scholars with whom I have corresponded: https://81018.com/alphabetical/#D.
My basic questions are few. Your YES/NO answers would be helpful:
1. Could the Planck base units describe the first moment of space-time: YES/NO/MAYBE
2. Might the first “thing’ within space-time be a sphere? YES/NO/MAYBE
3. Does that sphere instantiate continuity, symmetry and harmony within space-time. YES/NO/MAYBE
4. Could the dimensionless constants be a bridge to continuity, symmetry and harmony. YES/NO/MAYBE
5. Might that bridge be neither finite nor infinite, i.e. it’s just a dynamic bridge (ratio)? YES/NO/MAYBE
Thank you.
Most sincerely,
Bruce
Notes: Research
High-gain free-electron lasers and harmonic generation Sandra G. Biedron, Giuseppe Dattoli, Henry P. Freund, Zhirong Huang, Stephen V. Milton, Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, Pier Luigi Ottaviani and Alberto Renieri, AIP Conference Proceedings 581, 203 (2001); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1401574
Relativistic wave equations: an operational approach, G. Dattoli, E. Sabia, K. Górska, A. Horzela, K. A. Penson,IOP Publishing Ltd, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, Volume 48, Number 12, March 2015
###