First email: 11 August 2019 @ 11:57 AM
Dear Prof. Dr. Rohan Abeyaratne:
In three quick steps I had opened and engaged your Volume II, Lecture Notes
Continuum Mechanics (1988, 2012, 2015). In 2011, we naively assumed a simple mathematically-defined boundary condition from the Planck scale through the microscale, human scale, and macroscale by using base-2, simply doubling the Planck base units just over 202 times. https://81018.com/chart/
If it is not silly or naive, we may have opened a very fascinating back door to a deeper understanding of our universe so we were encouraged to make further assumptions.
Might we assume that Planck time is the very first unit of time within the universe?
Might we assume that Planck Length is the first spatial dimension? We then took a bit of a leap of faith in Einstein’s baseline equation to include Planck mass and Planck charge. Are these resulting 202 notations or doublings worthy of anyone’s time to study?
You are surely in a very unique position to judge that question and I would be most pleased to hear your thoughts about it. Thank you.