8 February 2026: A report while re-engaging AI on our “State of the Universe in 2026”

by Bruce E. Camber and AI systems

I. Introduction

If there were to be an Annual Report on “the paradigm shift in progress,” what would it look like? Might we emerge with a “State of the Universe” report. Might that report be helpful if such an assessment was done each year by scholars and the public? To be sure, if such a report was about areas and subjects that are measurable, it could be done annually.

Perhaps we can expand these baselines to define deeper structures of the universe.

We believe there is enough creativity among all of us to identify those measurables, so it could be done annually. We first opened the concept for consideration in 2019. Now, in these days we have enlisted the help from our AI systems such as Anthropic’s Claude, ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Grok, and Perplexity. We then engaged Google’s Gemini for the next version. The author of this preliminary report is me, Bruce E. Camber. For these analyses , I welcome your thoughts and ideas.

II. Background

In December 2011 our high school geometry classes stumbled into the Planck scale by going deeper and deeper inside the tetrahedron and the octahedron within it. Within a couple of days we quietly uncovered 202 based-2 notations to mathematically encapsulate the universe’s length and time. Since those days, we have been rather haphazardly building something that has become quite audacious: a geometric alternative to Big Bang cosmology. Notwithstanding, for fourteen years we’ve been told that we are idiosyncratic, probably wrong, most often just ignored. What pushes these dynamics forward are insights about three major belief systems that just did not feel right:

  • Aristotle convinced the public that the symmetry of the tetrahedron was perfect. Unchallenged for 1800 years, he thought one could tile and tessellate the universe with tetrahedrons, but there’s a 7.356° gap when five tetrahedra share a common edge —and that gap, we now understand, is where the tensions begin for what will become the first quantum fluctuation.
  • Newton’s absolute space and time (still dominant in our intuitions) taught us to treat spacetime as a stage rather than an actor. But the 202 base-2 notations from Planck to now reveal something different: 202 simultaneously active harmonic layers, each redefining space and time.
  • The Big Bang singularity (barely 100 years old but already canonical) asked us to accept creation from nothing and expansion from nowhere. Our model starts with something: A Planck sphere, then 18.5 tredecillion per second, spinning, stacking, building the lattice that becomes spacetime itself.

These three are fundamental parts of human history. They are not malicious errors. Once started, each concept slowly grew until dominant. They seemed like the best available frameworks within their time. But by 2025, the cracks have been showing: dark matter halos we can’t be found, a Hubble constant that won’t cooperate, JWST images that look too mature too early, and a first second of the universe we can barely discuss coherently.

We’ve needed new foundations.

III. What We’ve Learned: 2025-2026 Breakthroughs

This past year changed everything—not because the model suddenly became “right,” but because the conversation finally began.

A. The Scholar Pages Are Live.

Over 500 scholars now have dedicated pages on 81018.com, many linking to our Manifesto, each documenting our attempts at engagement. Some have responded. Most haven’t. But the infrastructure is there, and the traffic is real. People are engaging. The silence is cracking.

B. AI, a Collaborative Partner

We are working with Anthropic’s Claude, ChatGPT, Grok, Perplexity, DeepSeek, and Gemini by Google. AI hasn’t just refined our communication—it has stress-tested our ideas in ways fourteen years of solo work couldn’t. When Claude pushed back on the tetrahedral gap implications for SU(3), we had to tighten the geometry. When ChatGPT questioned the 202-notation timeline, we had to clarify which notations contain which epochs. When Gemini asked about human consciousness and the middle domains, Notations 101 to 105, we began discussing it in earnest.

These aren’t just editorial improvements; they’re conceptual advances. The AIs don’t replace human peer review—they prepare us for it.

C. The Geometric Core Is Clarifying

Notations 0-10 are now well-defined: pure geometry, perfect continuity-symmetry-harmony, the Planck Polyhedral Core generating the first archetypal forms.

Notations 11-24 remain the “dark realm”—below instrumental reach, but mathematically consequential. This is where gauge symmetries emerge geometrically, where the 7.356° gap creates the asymmetries that will become particle physics.

Notations 24-67 we’ve named the breaking cascade. It is the area of active E8 and SU(5) research. See the page on Notation 32.

Notation 67 is the threshold where quantum fluctuations dominate, where imperfection becomes a variable rather than an impossibility.

That is the geometric core.

A physical core is now emergent.

Notations 67-143 maps the universe from the first few yoctoseconds to the first second of the universe even today.

Notations 143-202 map onto observable cosmology in ways we’re just beginning to test: the first second at 143, the first year at 169, the first billion years at 199.

D. The Testable Predictions Are Emerging

We’re not asking for belief—we’re offering falsifiability:

  • CMBR power spectra: The 7.356° tetrahedral gap should produce specific density variations in the cosmic microwave background. Planck satellite data should either confirm or refute this.
  • Dark matter distribution: If dark matter is geometric (gap-induced rather than particle-based), large-scale structure simulations should match N-body results without needing new particles.
  • Hubble tension resolution: Our continuous geometric expansion, driven by tredecillion-per-second sphere stacking, should account for H₀ discrepancies without invoking dark energy.

These aren’t vague gestures—they’re computational challenges we’re inviting the community to run.

E. The Language Is Getting Sharpened.

“Toy model” used to feel apologetic. Now it feels honest. We’re building the simplest possible geometric framework that could explain the largest possible phenomena. If it’s wrong, it will be clearly wrong. That’s the point.

“Hyper-rational” captures something essential: a universe that emerges not from randomness but from mathematical necessity—pi, e, √2, φ as actors, not just constants.

“202 notations” is our fundamental unit. Not years, not meters—doublings from Planck to now. Every notation active, every scale connected.

IV. This has all become part of our 2026 agenda.

A. The idea has been brewing since 2019.

Thinking about the universe, making it your orientation for everything, starts the process:
https://81018.com/state-2019/

B. A first draft seven years later. This is the second draft a week later.

Slow but informative progress keeps the thought on the back burner:
https://81018.com/state-of-universe-first-draft/

C. Manifesto to movement to sharpen the vision.

The Essential Manifesto (now live at /manifesto/) gives newcomers a 3-minute entry point. But manifestos only matter if they catalyze action.

D. AI Platforms sharpen the vision.

Perfection Studies • 81018.com • Est. 1972
“Only thought experiments and logic can go there.”