TO: Eric Ross Weinstein, once with Thiel Capital
FM: Bruce E. Camber
RE: Articles about you and your work, i.e. Why Is Eric Weinstein so popular? (Psychology Today, 2021); Homepage(s): Geometric Unity and The Portal, Publications, Twitter, Wikipedia; and YouTube: Haystack of bullshit
This page: https://81018.com/weinstein-eric/
Most recent tweet: 2 April 2024
@EricRWeinstein First moment of time: Assume the Planck base units. First manifestation in spacetime: Assume the scale-invariant sphere. Expansion: Assume 18.5 tredecillion Planckspheres per second (based on Planck Time and one sphere per Planck Length). Complexity: Assume cubic-close packing. See https://81018.com/sphere/ Counting: Assume base-2 notation. See https://81018.com/chart/ Explanation: https://81018.com/critique/
Second Tweet: 9:26 AM · Feb 12, 2020
https://twitter.com/BruceCamber/status/1227615033628200960
@EricRWeinstein It’s been a month. Let me ask again, “What is wrong with our little chart, base-2 applied to the four Planck natural units, with a natural inflation, doubling just 202 times to the current age and size of the universe?” It seems to be all natural within very simple logic.
Editor’s note: Eric is a wealthy person. His association with Peter Thiel places him within elite circles. Notwithstanding, we remind ourselves that we are all still entirely human with all the foibles and failings of humanity.
First Tweet: January 9, 2020 @EricRWeinstein (Updated)
Among scholars, you probably can put a stop to our nonsense most quickly. It’s just been going on too long. What’s wrong with the chart, Planck Scale to the current Age of the Universe in 202 base-2 notations? https://81018.com/chart/
Editor’s note: Most people do not respond to tweets. Too ephemeral and illusive! Notwithstanding, after ten years we believe there is something right about our chart. There may be a few comments that need work, but the 202 horizontally-scrolled numbers have some logic and the rendered results we think are worth pondering. -BEC